Magnetic forces to blame for 9/11 tower collapse
Magnetic forces to blame for 9/11 tower collapse
By Steve Connor
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
Scientists can finally explain why the Twin Towers collapsed on September 11, despite the temperature of the fires being well below the 1,500C melting point of the steel girders holding up the buildings.
The discovery that unusual magnetic forces within the girders made them weak at temperatures of about 500C explains away the conspiracy theories that have spread like wildfire since the disaster.
Sergei Dudarev, of the UK Atomic Energy Agency, found that steel loses its strength above 500C because its molecules undergo a physical transition from one state to another due to magnetic fluctuations. "The steel didn't melt, it just became soft. It is an unusual state and the temperatures in the Twin Towers were high enough to cause it because the thermal insulation was knocked off the girders through the impact with the aircraft," he said.
"Understanding how materials behave means we can find the right 'medicine' to make steel stronger at high temperatures... and if our work can be used for other applications, such as safeguarding tall buildings against disasters, so much the better," he said.
By Steve Connor
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
Scientists can finally explain why the Twin Towers collapsed on September 11, despite the temperature of the fires being well below the 1,500C melting point of the steel girders holding up the buildings.
The discovery that unusual magnetic forces within the girders made them weak at temperatures of about 500C explains away the conspiracy theories that have spread like wildfire since the disaster.
Sergei Dudarev, of the UK Atomic Energy Agency, found that steel loses its strength above 500C because its molecules undergo a physical transition from one state to another due to magnetic fluctuations. "The steel didn't melt, it just became soft. It is an unusual state and the temperatures in the Twin Towers were high enough to cause it because the thermal insulation was knocked off the girders through the impact with the aircraft," he said.
"Understanding how materials behave means we can find the right 'medicine' to make steel stronger at high temperatures... and if our work can be used for other applications, such as safeguarding tall buildings against disasters, so much the better," he said.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by I811st on
-
Oh,Kay? so that must mean the heat also inceases the "magnetic" forces of gravity. the steel structure was engineered to support the weight of the materials but all that hot steel must've caused a incease in gravitational force applied to the building.the increase in mass,or weight,would explain the acceleration of the falling object to appear as if there was no resistance from the underlying floors. ........OMG! you're kidding.right? someone get that frikin' scientist a nobel prize for that discovery! Him and Al Gore can both mumble their Hypothesis' while fellating Glen Beck. Just like that FEMA camp "expert" from Pop.Mechanics.Junk Science brought the buildings down,yay.
-
Permalink Reply by ricoyung on
-
LMFAO! Indeed that Pop Mechanics one was "Rich" with insight.
I811st said:Oh,Kay? so that must mean the heat also inceases the "magnetic" forces of gravity. the steel structure was engineered to support the weight of the materials but all that hot steel must've caused a incease in gravitational force applied to the building.the increase in mass,or weight,would explain the acceleration of the falling object to appear as if there was no resistance from the underlying floors. ........OMG! you're kidding.right? someone get that frikin' scientist a nobel prize for that discovery! Him and Al Gore can both mumble their Hypothesis' while fellating Glen Beck. Just like that FEMA camp "expert" from Pop.Mechanics.Junk Science brought the buildings down,yay.
-
-
Or maybe "Nanites" escaped from the Stargate set, yeah...that's the ticket!
And I'm willing to bet the public would believe it!
baked clam said:how wrong could they be? lol I have a better explanation., wait for it,., wait for it,., metal eating termites from bush's anus, its either that or thermite was placed in strategical spots kinda like they do when demolishing large buildings, but that would mean that wtc was intentionaly demolished by someone with alot of experience and we all know that it just couldnt be.,.wink wink
-
Permalink Reply by Marklar on
-
Sounds to me like they are saying the firemen did it since the strongest conceivable source of magnetism that day was in their radios. Obviously Popular mechanics hates fire fighters and other first responders.
-
-
Then again the evidence is pretty convincing for the theory presented in this article I wrote so maybe it wasn't firemen after all:
http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/nist-admits-towers-did-not
-
Permalink Reply by diggin'upthedesert! on
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3moTXmPbtk
Put the blame right where it belongs - with the Rockefeller- shadow government in cahoots with Bush/Wall street/Paulson/Bernanke crowd covering up too much - 9/11 happened.
Put the blame where it belongs - our own inside terrorists, including the financial terrorists and polititians who had/still have much to cover up.
It's not about the steel - just like a gun - it is an inanimate object - it's the one behind the gun.
It all started someplace, not just with the steel!!!
-
-
wow marklar that was funny...have you submitted it to this site?
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
and has anyone seen this one?:
http://blip.tv/file/1272900
Marklar said:Then again the evidence is pretty convincing for the theory presented in this article I wrote so maybe it wasn't firemen after all:
http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/nist-admits-towers-did-not
-
-
has anyone seen that docu.movie, "9/11 Octopus"?, This article getting into magnetics is starting to smell of a cover-up for what that documentary suggests. it's an indication of military electro-mag ,beam weaponry. basically a "black-ops"/"blue-beam", speculative hypothesis. but they might be onto something ,which required this "scientist" to publish this as a counter-intel, half-truth. Everyone is a double agent nowadays, so the "truth" will be whatever you want it to be.i dont know.no one does.
-
Permalink Reply by agentOgden on
-
LMFAO
-
-
Trout the Proletarian wrote:"
Only to leave a paper passport on top of pulverized steel and cement of the ring leader who left a Koran and a credit card everywhere he went",
as the initial reports came in via text message and spread undisputedly on YouTube by the droves of "illitrit youts" the real culprits were actually "K-O-R-E-A-N" ,funded by the angry dwarf, Kim jung il. who as the norm for most short people in our society, got no credit for the attack.and has been kicking and screaming mad ever since over the lack of attention.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
“What’s His Motive?” - Inside The Mind of George Soros
In this short clip, Patrick Bet-David, Sebastian Gorka Adam Sosnick, and Tom Ellsworth George Soros and what motivates him to do the things he does. FaceTime...
"If you're ever out there Doc V and notice giant two legged birds roaming the wilderness be…"
Ashrams and Moonies Perfect Case for Mind Control
In the late 60’s and into the 70’s we saw a strange phenomenon emerge! That was the rise of cults…See More
Modern Progress
From some things you just can’t come backNot everyone has your backIt might just be a nuclear…See More
"cheeki kea, yes they have already produced a Wooly Mammoth by crossing DNA from frozen remains in…"
© 2025 Created by truth.
Powered by
