The CIA Coup That Kept America on the Road of Militarism: The Assassination of JFK
http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl2/murder-of-jfk.html
Jim Douglass’s bona fides as a peacemaker are impeccable: civil disobedience, protesting
Trident submarines and White Trains at Ground Zero in Washington
for years, four books of Christian peacemaking theology (cf. The
Nonviolent Coming of God, 1991), founding a Catholic Worker
House of Hospitality in Birmingham, and importuning John Paul II
to encamp in Baghdad to prevent the 1991 Bush I attack. Why would
he then spend a decade or more holed up, writing a book on Kennedy’s
presidency and assassination?
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters is the answer.
Douglass was familiar with Thomas Merton’s anxieties about
a nuclear holocaust. Merton feared for Kennedy if he turned away
from the Cold War, concerns he shared with Ethel Kennedy. Douglass
shares John XXIII’s hopeful view that “everything is possible,”
which Kennedy and Khrushchev had begun to demonstrate by the time
of Kennedy’s death.
At the center of the short history of Kennedy’s thousand days is his aversion
to war, which began with the Bay of Pigs and the Cuban missile crisis.
He was determined to end the Cold War by reaching rapprochements
with Nikita Khrushchev and Fidel Castro, and he made courageous
moves in that direction. These moves met with bitter opposition
from the CIA, the Pentagon, and military-industrial leaders. They
were determined to win the Cold War by a nuclear first strike, and
saw Kennedy as treasonous. They stubbornly resisted his directives,
and when he decided to pull US troops from Vietnam, end the isolation
of Cuba, and work with Khrushchev for disarmament, a network of
CIA operatives assassinated him.
Washington closed ranks to lay it all at the feet of Lee Harvey Oswald. Kennedy
had foreseen his end. Early on he observed that he might survive
one or two Bays of Pigs, but not a third. In fact, he had escaped
the CIA Bay of Pigs entrapment. The CIA wanted to entrap him into
a war with Cuba. When the attack failed, Kennedy refused to send
in planes and ground troops. He rejected the military-CIA recommendation
to attack Cuba in the missile crisis there and nuke the Soviet Union
if it intervened. He and Bobby had beaten back an inflationary steel
price increase. He again rejected military counsel to nuke the Soviets
when the Berlin Wall went up (they foresaw 140 million Soviet deaths
and 30 million US victims). He negotiated a neutral Laos government
with Khrushchev (the Pentagon wanted air attacks), and rode a swelling
public tide to easy Senate approval of a nuclear test ban treaty
that no one had anticipated being ratified. In an American University
speech and in another at the United Nations he called for a rapprochement
to end the Cold War’s danger. He pursued an understanding with
Castro, and formally declared his intention to withdraw all US troops
from Vietnam.
Kennedy stood virtually alone against aides, the CIA, and the Joint
Chiefs who were not averse to rank disobedience and acting behind
his back. The CIA tried to kill Castro with a poisoned diving suit,
a plot Kennedy knew nothing of, but since his emissary had already
given Castro a diving suit, there was no need to deliver the CIA’s
suit. Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge promoted the assassination of
Diem in Vietnam and deflected every Kennedy effort to stop it. The
CIA ran South Vietnam and was determined to remain there.
Jim Douglass’s bona fides as a peacemaker are impeccable: civil disobedience, protesting
Trident submarines and White Trains at Ground Zero in Washington
for years, four books of Christian peacemaking theology (cf. The
Nonviolent Coming of God, 1991), founding a Catholic Worker
House of Hospitality in Birmingham, and importuning John Paul II
to encamp in Baghdad to prevent the 1991 Bush I attack. Why would
he then spend a decade or more holed up, writing a book on Kennedy’s
presidency and assassination?
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters is the answer.
Douglass was familiar with Thomas Merton’s anxieties about
a nuclear holocaust. Merton feared for Kennedy if he turned away
from the Cold War, concerns he shared with Ethel Kennedy. Douglass
shares John XXIII’s hopeful view that “everything is possible,”
which Kennedy and Khrushchev had begun to demonstrate by the time
of Kennedy’s death.
At the center of the short history of Kennedy’s thousand days is his aversion
to war, which began with the Bay of Pigs and the Cuban missile crisis.
He was determined to end the Cold War by reaching rapprochements
with Nikita Khrushchev and Fidel Castro, and he made courageous
moves in that direction. These moves met with bitter opposition
from the CIA, the Pentagon, and military-industrial leaders. They
were determined to win the Cold War by a nuclear first strike, and
saw Kennedy as treasonous. They stubbornly resisted his directives,
and when he decided to pull US troops from Vietnam, end the isolation
of Cuba, and work with Khrushchev for disarmament, a network of
CIA operatives assassinated him.
Washington closed ranks to lay it all at the feet of Lee Harvey Oswald. Kennedy
had foreseen his end. Early on he observed that he might survive
one or two Bays of Pigs, but not a third. In fact, he had escaped
the CIA Bay of Pigs entrapment. The CIA wanted to entrap him into
a war with Cuba. When the attack failed, Kennedy refused to send
in planes and ground troops. He rejected the military-CIA recommendation
to attack Cuba in the missile crisis there and nuke the Soviet Union
if it intervened. He and Bobby had beaten back an inflationary steel
price increase. He again rejected military counsel to nuke the Soviets
when the Berlin Wall went up (they foresaw 140 million Soviet deaths
and 30 million US victims). He negotiated a neutral Laos government
with Khrushchev (the Pentagon wanted air attacks), and rode a swelling
public tide to easy Senate approval of a nuclear test ban treaty
that no one had anticipated being ratified. In an American University
speech and in another at the United Nations he called for a rapprochement
to end the Cold War’s danger. He pursued an understanding with
Castro, and formally declared his intention to withdraw all US troops
from Vietnam.
Even cats have only nine lives. Kennedy had used all nine.
Throughout,Kennedy stood virtually alone against aides, the CIA, and the Joint
Chiefs who were not averse to rank disobedience and acting behind
his back. The CIA tried to kill Castro with a poisoned diving suit,
a plot Kennedy knew nothing of, but since his emissary had already
given Castro a diving suit, there was no need to deliver the CIA’s
suit. Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge promoted the assassination of
Diem in Vietnam and deflected every Kennedy effort to stop it. The
CIA ran South Vietnam and was determined to remain there.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Who Were the Silver Ghosts and Fork Tailed Devils Over Germany in WWII?
The year is 1943 and the Germans are punishing the US Eighth Air Force during their daylight…See More
THE GREAT FLOOD Official Trailer (2026) Netflix | Global Disaster Movies 4K
🌊 A world pushed past the breaking point.In THE GREAT FLOOD (2026), rising oceans, collapsing cities, and unstoppable storms trigger a global disaster unlik...
Mothman Prophecies
When suddenly the universe looked downIt seemed everything came unwoundI wondered if my sanity was…See More
"Joined Facebook after a 5 year absence. One absolutely undeniable picture that Hunter was in!!!!"
The 100 Series Designated for SAC and a Possible WWIII
The “100 Series” as these fighter aircraft were labeled were a succession of Mach II capable…See More
Human Be-In - Full Program - 1/14/1967 - Polo Fields, Golden Gate Park (Official)
Human Be-In - Full ProgramRecorded Live: 1/14/1967 - Polo Fields, Golden Gate Park - San Francisco, CAMore Human Be-In at Music Vault: http://www.musicvault....
"So sad to see a nice place be ruined by its inhabitants.... It's that shitholeness spreading…"
"Jesus Christ this is more diabolical than just about anything I've studied even though I knew…"
"Less Prone Nothing wrong with the planet. It's the inhabitants who are the problem."
"That assignment on the blue planet intrigued me a lot. And here we are now! I cannot say it's…"
Sebastion Piñera and 5G
Sebastion Piñera “The start of the bidding process for the 5G network. Let’s listen to the threats…See More
© 2025 Created by truth.
Powered by
