Comment

Comment by Christopher on November 20, 2013 at 1:51pm

My apologies for that - perhaps its just that I have grown too accustomed to commenting here, and may be I just surmise, that most folks know where I stand on this momentous issue, and also; know where am coming from.

But yes, I do believe that Oswald was an CIA operative, and; do not believe in the "lone gunman" theory.

Comment by Not mainstreamer on November 20, 2013 at 1:43pm

Mindreading is required to understand what you want to say when you use no words for telling that

Comment by Christopher on November 20, 2013 at 1:39pm

"There is no point in the "full story" message"

Well; it serves to show how the mainstream media, continues to regularly schedule 'their' programming.

I'll make them all, look that much more corrupt (bought and paid for) and stupid, as time goes on.

Comment by Not mainstreamer on November 20, 2013 at 1:37pm

There is no point in the "full story" message

Comment by Christopher on November 20, 2013 at 1:29pm

Not at all - I was merely echoing your thoughts, about the IBTimes, et al.

Comment by Not mainstreamer on November 20, 2013 at 1:29pm

Are you saying you did not know Oswald was a CIA agent. That is a fact. What is not a fact is the opposite, Oswald being a "marxist". Oswald was a Kennedy supporter.

Comment by Christopher on November 20, 2013 at 1:25pm

Are you and me, and so many other people, so deluded, and simply wrapped up in nothing but conspiracy theories, or is the mainstream media hoping that we will all just return to 'their' regularly scheduled programming?

Comment by Not mainstreamer on November 20, 2013 at 1:22pm

International Business Times:

Answers to these questions, and others, will not incontrovertibly prove that there was -- or was not -- a second gunman in Dealey Plaza during the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

But they will give the American people a better idea about whether the initial portrayal of Lee Harvey Oswald by the media and authorities was the truth. Or a lie.

A lot of reharsh with dozens of links to make it more trustworthy. We already know from Jim Garrison Oswald was a CIA agent. But International Business Times journalists seem to know nothing.

Comment by Christopher on November 20, 2013 at 1:10pm

The United States Navy Base at Atsugi, Japan, to which U. S. Marine Corps member Oswald was assigned from September 1957 to November 1958, was not just a run-of-the-mill U.S. Navy-operated defense base. It was and is a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) base. Among other intelligence operations, the Atsugi base was one of two bases from which the CIA operated the top secret U-2 spy plane, which flew reconnaissance and surveillance missions over the Soviet Union and China. Why was the low-achieving, nondescript Oswald assigned to such a top secret and important base?

When Oswald defected to the Soviet Union in October 1959, as a former Marine, a 201 File on him containing personnel documents should have been created by the CIA, because he had been stationed at a top secret naval base. No such file was immediately opened; instead, it was delayed. Why?

Rather, a 201 File on him was created a year later, in December 1960, and that late opening compels questions regarding how the CIA interpreted Oswald’s defection.

To underscore, the CIA’s treatment of Oswald’s defection was an anomaly -- it says something about who Oswald was, or, minimally, how his file was viewed by the CIA. If a former U.S. Marine defected from the United States to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, and if he truly posed a risk of giving U.S. radar secrets and other sensitive information to the Russians, then why did the CIA did not immediately open a 201 File on him?

Full story: http://www.ibtimes.com/jfk-assassination-just-who-was-lee-harvey-os...

Comment by Not mainstreamer on November 20, 2013 at 12:54pm

There are other sources that confirms Leroy Fletcher Prouty.

Those who meet the Atheists will know how important "Theory of Evolution" is for them to attack Christianity.

Just blow that theory and the Atheist will be screaming for help from the moderator. Nothing is more Holy for the mainstream moderators ... they are so scared by critics of Evolution they will delete those who dare promote that.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page