UN AGENDA 21 - Governments to Take Control of All Land Use
Considering its policies are woven into all the General Plans of the cities and counties, it's important for people to know where these policies are coming from. While many people support the United Nations for its supposed 'peacemaking' efforts, hardly anyone knows that they have very specific land use policies that they would like to see implemented in every city, county, state and nation. The specific plan is called United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, which has its basis in Communitarianism. By now, most Americans have heard of sustainable development but are largely unaware of Agenda 21.
In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control.
Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of "Communities as determined by the governing body".
Moreover, "people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation".
Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.
U.N. Agenda 21 cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected.
It calls for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer countries will have more, a redistribution of wealth.
Although people around the world aspire to achieve the levels of prosperity we have in our country, and will risk their lives to get here, Americans are cast in a very negative light and need to be taken down to a condition closer to average in the world. Only then, they say, will there be social justice which is a cornerstone of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan.
Agenda 21 policies date back to the 70's but it got its real start in 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro when President Bush signed onto it. Click here to see a list of the countries that signed UN Agenda 21. President Clinton took office the following year and created the President's Council on Sustainable Development to implement it in the United States. Made up of federal agencies, corporations, and non-profit groups, the President's Council on Sustainable Development moved quickly to ensure that all federal agencies would change their policies to comply with UN Agenda 21.
A non-governmental organization called the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives, ICLEI, is tasked with carrying out the goals of Agenda 21 worldwide.
Remember: UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a global plan that is implemented locally. Over 600 cities in the U.S. are members; our town joined in 2007. The costs are paid by taxpayers.
It's time that people educate themselves and read the document and related commentary. After that, get a copy of your city or county's General Plan and read it. You will find all sorts of policies that are nearly identical to those in U.N. Agenda 21.
Unfortunately, their policies have advanced largely unnoticed and we are now in the end game.
People need to identify their elected officials who are promoting the U.N.'s policies and hold them accountable for their actions. Only when we've identified who the people are and what they are trying to do will we be able to evaluate whether or not we approve of the policies they are putting forward. Some people may think it's appropriate for agencies outside the United States to set our policies and some people will not. The question is, aren't Americans able to develop their own policies? Should we rely on an organization that consists of member nations that have different forms of governments, most of which do not value individual rights as much as we do? It's time to bring U.N. Agenda 21 out in the open where we can have these debates and then set our own policies in accordance with our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Ok, you say, interesting, but I don't see how that really affects me. Here are a few ways:
No matter where you live, I'll bet that there have been hundreds of condos built in the center of your town recently. Over the last ten years there has been a 'planning revolution' across the US. Your commercial, industrial, and multi-residential land was rezoned to 'mixed use.'
Nearly everything that got approvals for development was designed the same way: ground floor retail with two stories of residential above. Mixed use. Very hard to finance for construction, and very hard to manage since it has to have a high density of people in order to justify the retail. A lot of it is empty and most of the ground floor retail is empty too. High bankruptcy rate.
So what? Most of your towns provided funding and/or infrastructure development for these private projects. They used Redevelopment Agency funds. Your money. Specifically, your property taxes. Notice how there's very little money in your General Funds now, and most of that is going to pay Police and Fire? Your street lights are off, your parks are shaggy, your roads are pot-holed, your hospitals are closing. The money that should be used for these things is diverted into the Redevelopment Agency.
It's the only agency in government that can float a bond without a vote of the people. And they did that, and now you're paying off those bonds for the next 45 years with your property taxes. Did you know that? And by the way, even if Redevelopment is ended, as in California, they still have to pay off existing debt--for 30 to 45 years.
So, what does this have to do with Agenda 21?
Redevelopment is a tool used to further the Agenda 21 vision of remaking America's cities.
With redevelopment, cities have the right to take property by eminent domain---against the will of the property owner, and give it or sell it to a private developer.
By declaring an area of town 'blighted' (and in some cities over 90% of the city area has been declared blighted) the property taxes in that area can be diverted away from the General Fund.
This constriction of available funds is impoverishing the cities, forcing them to offer less and less services, and reducing your standard of living.
They'll be telling you that it's better, however, since they've put in nice street lights and colored paving. The money gets redirected into the Redevelopment Agency and handed out to favored developers building low income housing and mixed use. Smart Growth.
Cities have had thousands of condos built in the redevelopment areas and are telling you that you are terrible for wanting your own yard, for wanting privacy, for not wanting to be dictated to by a Condo Homeowner's Association Board, for being anti-social, for not going along to get along, for not moving into a cramped apartment downtown where they can use your property taxes for paying off that huge bond debt. But it's not working, and you don't want to move in there. So they have to make you. Read on.
Human habitation, as it is referred to now, is restricted to lands within the Urban Growth Boundaries of the city. Only certain building designs are permitted.
Rural property is more and more restricted in what uses can be on it. Although counties say that they support agricultural uses, eating locally produced food, farmer's markets, etc, in fact there are so many regulations restricting water and land use (there are scenic corridors, inland rural corridors, baylands corridors, area plans, specific plans, redevelopment plans, huge fees, fines) that farmers are losing their lands altogether.
County roads are not being paved. The push is for people to get off of the land, become more DEPENDENT, come into the cities. To get out of the suburbs and into the cities. Out of their private homes and into condos. Out of their private cars and onto their bikes.
Bikes. What does that have to do with it? I like to ride my bike and so do you. So what? Bicycle advocacy groups are very powerful now. Advocacy. A fancy word for lobbying, influencing, and maybe strong-arming the public and politicians. What's the conection with bike groups? National groups such as Complete Streets, Thunderhead Alliance, and others, have training programs teaching their members how to pressure for redevelopment, and training candidates for office. It's not just about bike lanes, it's about remaking cities and rural areas to the 'sustainable model'.
High density urban development without parking for cars is the goal. This means that whole towns need to be demolished and rebuilt in the image of sustainable development. Bike groups are being used as the 'shock troops' for this plan.
What plan? We're losing our homes since this recession/depression began, and many of us could never afford those homes to begin with. We got cheap money, used whatever we had to squeak into those homes, and now some of us lost them. We were lured, indebted, and sunk. Whole neighborhoods are empty in some places. Some are being bulldozed. Cities cannot afford to extend services outside of their core areas.
Slowly, people will not be able to afford single family homes. Will not be able to afford private cars. Will be more dependent. More restricted. More easily watched and monitored.
This plan is a whole life plan. It involves the educational system, the energy market, the transportation system, the governmental system, the health care system, food production, and more.
The plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and take away your voice.
One of the ways is by using the Delphi Technique to 'manufacture consensus.'
Another is to infiltrate community groups or actually start neighborhood associations with hand-picked 'leaders'.
Another is to groom and train future candidates for local offices.
Another is to sponsor non-governmental groups that go into schools and train (brainwash) children.
Another is to offer federal and private grants and funding for city programs that further the agenda.
Another is to educate a new generation of land use planners to require New Urbanism.
Another is to convert factories to other uses, introduce energy measures that penalize manufacturing, and set energy consumption goals to pre-1985 levels.
Another is to allow "Unregulated Immigration" in order to lower standards of living and drain local resources.
There are many radio shows on the web---just search Author - Rosa Koire's name. Her best seller book called "Behind the Green Mask". Here are some from the past.
Rosa with Elena, The View From Montana Sept 13, 2012 click here
Rosa with Rumor Mill News' Melinda Pillsbury-Foster Feb 21, 2012 click
Rosa with KSFO's BARBARA SIMPSON JANUARY 15, 2012 (problem with this link, we're working on it)
Rosa with Marti Oakley on TS Radio January 11, 2012 Great show! click here
ROSA KOIRE WITH MAGGIE RODDIN ON THE UNSOLICITED OPINION, SEPT 23, 2011 CLICK HERE
ROSA KOIRE DEBATES LYNN PLAMBECK 'IS AGENDA 21 REAL?', RADIO, SEPT 1, 2011 CLICK HERE
Rosa Koire, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21, FreeMeNowRadio CLICK HERE
ROSA KOIRE on The Unsolicited Opinion radio show May 26, 2011 CLICK HERE
PHILADELPHIA RADIO SHOW-- ROSA KOIRE December 15, 2010 CLICK HERE
COLORADO RADIO SHOW --The Unsolicited Opinion-- ROSA KOIRE, APRIL 20, 2011 CLICK HERE
REDDING, CA RADIO SHOW--'We, the People'--- ROSA KOIRE, MAY 8, 2011 CLICK HERE
ROSA KOIRE WITH MARTI OAKLEY AND BARBARA PETERSON JANUARY 11, 2012 CLICK HERE
ROSA KOIRE (Author of "Behind the Green Mask") WITH JEFF RENSE ON RENSE RADIO (CLICK ON THE ARROWS BELOW FOR SHOWS IN JULY AND DECEMBER 2011)
- the Agenda 21 vision of remaking America's cities.
- The plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and take away your voice
- But then you have UN Agenda 21. What is it? See our videos and radio shows
Bundy Ranch should be a prime example, but Cliven Bundy has a perpective that differs from Rosa Koire (More research is needed. I think Rosa Koire is right on the local level. The big picture is too demanding for Rosa Koire)
Here we are to believe "Obama" is the problem. "Agenda 21" is an equal good answer. Next "hypocrisies" will be the problem. We have to concept what we are facing ... an enemy that is invisible for most
(34:30- ) "Because Israel is the Great test of Jewish traditions"
Peter Beinart is an honest man, but he too believes "Zionism" is about fighting everyday Palestines, not about fighting everyday Americans.
- The plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and take away your voice
Not questioning substance of statement - Whos plan is it?
from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcruyJTfnCQ (25:18 --)
The enslavement document is dated 1979 - i.e. before Agenda 21 was created at UN Rio Climate Conference. We can conclude plan does not originate with Agenda 21.
Deborah Tavares tells from documents (video 37:00 - 39:00)
That means we are all fooled. This is not an U.S. government - that is waging war for U.S. - this is something else, and it has been like that since Roosevelt Presidency (it confirms my analyses, there is a Shadow Government)
(Martin Armstrong case: when someone makes trouble just by doing his business, he will be wrongly persecuted. There is no functional Justice. This is much bigger than Israel lobbyists, they are only the tip of the iceberg)
When U.S. government is "in name only", then what is "FBI", "NSA" and "DHS"?
Changing this basic assumption: 911, Iraq war, Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, gun grabbing & Bundy Ranch makes sense. Conspiracy is what we should assume, whole government is a conspiracy. The disappearing trillions are for the Shadow Government. Drug trafficing is for the Shadow Government. They cannot put those transfers on the budget.
Government to control all land use, yes, it's communism.
THIS, is getting to the BIG ISSUES.
Up the top of page,
" ....the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control. "
I guess 1st we gotto define and bring out the rectitude or not, of both the false shopfront US government, and the same of the alleged' Shadow Government', which I quite believe exists.
Then we gotto divest our minds of FALSE economic and land use theories, beliefs, opinions, and assumptions as have become accepted as OK and even proper and correct over time, especially entrenched in the 1st world.
Then we gotto find the science behind how humans DO best relate to the land, as all earthlife's supplier-'mother' [or parent].
The biggest problem in this 'flair-up', Bundy Ranch but one small event in the long line, is a common belief, NOT based on science of the most efficient, that-is the most economical, AND ecologically sustainable land use.
It's been mere brute and random 'winner takes all' scenario in the USA since, well...., Columbus.
Of course, all colonial expansionism of all time, has been the same. And, probably, all conquerers and their elite of committees have had idealistic hopes of making good the new territories they colonialize.
But always, unforeseen events and forces interfere with the Ghengis Khan type emperor, and their dreams are shattered.
Now, in this latest era, when basically, the species has no more 'free land' to absorb into their 'kingdom' or empire, etc, and the human population is 'peaking' toward over-pop., and other stuff like the general trend, for good or ill, toward activists for all manner of 'Rights' and freedoms and ethics, like ending slavery, child labor, sexual exploitation, the rise of feminism, and 'fair wages' [none of which are actual, IMO, but the 'paperwork' has some, but a small, effect], there comes the abilities of large numbers to organize themselves, and with access to more 'global' that-is less partial information, less myopic beliefs and accepted but awry 'traditions', we can, and have to look to science for the best path/s forward, specifically in regards to how a basically over-pop planet can survive.
The bottom line term is 'sustainability'.
This grinds against most all modern 'traditional' beliefs about how we use the land.
If we step back - and it becomes everyone's duty to do so - and look at whether the lands around us are being used anywhere near efficiently, if our heads are screwed on the right way, we do see, and easily, that the accepted methods and trends and market-based ways of land usage/s, is FUCKING DISGUSSSSTING!
There's hardly ONE accepted 'fashion' of our covering the land, the most precious asset the species has, next to our own Intellect, which is really, logically, practically, economically, thus efficiently set-out.
'Industrialization' of the last 200 plus years, has blinded us, in-hand with the filthy religious cults, to knowing 1, where happiness is found, so eliminating this errant belief that consuming more material produce will, and 2, that there's an endless supply of resources to provide, not for balanced people, and nations, etc, but FUCKING INSATIABLE dicks. Elitist, inbred, insane, 'we're superior' dicks in the main.
'Consumerism' [to stray a little] is but their means of keeping the profits going their way, by luring the masses, the impossible to satiate masses, because of the theft of their lands, into desiring their own fucking castles and palaces.
So it is with the proper/improper distribution of land.
I learned, and accept this as right minded thinking and reason, that the land is NOT ours 'as individuals', to do with, to use or abuse as our own personal desires would have us.
The line I learned, is, [paraphrased] that we have a right to enjoy whatever we can legally earn and produce, or exchange. But the land is not anything we as one or a group ever produced. It's the opposite, come to the material side of our being.
IT, the earth, produced US!
That's why it's referred to by many traditions and cultures, as the mother earth.
So all sorts of corrections should come into being if we know this as so, such that we have to re-orientate most everything we've come to accept about what we do with the land.
Adding to this, as said, we're arrived at the era where our elites from the leading warmonger nations, can no longer merely raise an army and march down another weaker people, and steal their lands, and do with it whatever they reckon, it's good for.
aka huge 'lordal estates' with but a few wealthy dynastic assholes warlords luxuriating upon it, while they have slaves chop down the PRECIOUS life-sustaining natural vegetation, and exterminating it's equally important fauna, so they can grow an 'economic' [BOOOOLLLLLSHSHSH-IT!!] crop or herd, to sustain their opulent lifestyles.
This is as much where the current large acreage farms concept derives from.
Then, there's the shallow, basically stupid market based use of the lands.
We have farmers sitting on mega-acreages, growing things like 'wheat' which our species has a natural aversion to - in short, wheat is toxic for our bodies - but because thousands of years ago, that was 1, indigenous to the cradles of our civilization - the middle east, etc., and 2, because the 'hebrews' now dominate global economics and markets - the IMF - we're sold the lemon of wheat as a daily food.
That's just one issue, which is big because wheat is such a highly grown AND MARKETED crop. Wheat requires destroying the ecological balance everywhere its planted in large scale.
ET cetera. This applies to almost all 'modern' farming methods, crops and herds. They're ALL so damned bad for the sustainability of the land, SO - DERR??! for us. Yet millions of 'farmers', of an huge number of market-popular crops and herds are spread over the PRECIOUS land, ignoring both the healthiest foods we could grow, and the best use of the land.
Land they're also killing with MONSANTO-type additives, ET cetera!
THAT's but one reason why the thinking, scientific dudes up at the UN and such, have come to the conclusions they have.
Sorry, this ain't elitist land-grabbing, for their own egoistic sakes.
All the science confirms we're trashing life on earth, merely by this erroneous belief that we, as mister-and-missus fucking rich-guy, have the right to buy stolen land and then abuse it because it looks great, to the uneducated eye, and pleases their ego.
Sure, not all 'farmers' are that. And sure, they're mostly tied to some pernicious contract with their creditors, corporate buyers, and O! banks, so being 'unduvuduals' have not the collective power to over-ride a bank's demands, so must grow poison to stay on their 'traditional' great grand parents' land, etc.
So we all sit on our gutless overfed fannies and hang shit on POSSIBLY ill-perceived global instrumentalities such as the EVIL-FUCKING COMMUNIST United Nations, because they're hitting us in the face with SCIENCE about land use.
If you think I'm a puppet of them, you're right. It shits me to tears, and to not enough BEER! or vodka [I'm not gonna reduce myself to diabetes thus if lucky, to dialysis in one of their evil hospices] to know I'm at-once, at war against them for their threats and incursions into everyone's basic human rights.
Look through my 1400-plus blog posts since 2002;
to see my "Outlaw" stance. Go back to the posts of around 2003-4-5-6 to see my verbal tirades against the 'establishment.
BUT, everyone's gotto accept that not all the establishment is evil and against the Common Folks.
Some are extremely Intelligent, Wise and very good at understanding the "ALL THINGS CONSIDERED" perspective on this the shithole we slop around in, called 'life', on Earth. On a finite amount of - land.
The 'worst case scenarios' painted up by the opinion-makers and idiot cynics especially on the internet, but initiated by seriously stupid 'right-wing' aka ME-FIRST, politicians, and their supportive media, now a culture of it's own, but puppets of the wrongheaded, aka spoiled elite, have to be read with huge bags of salt, ready to dump on them, if we use our Intellects, and discern their coming from 'traditional' 'beliefs' from selfish egomaniacs who profit most from these really bad and disastrously corrupt economic laws, and NOT from any genuinely Humane and scientific, balanced base.
I DO NOT agree with 'big government'.
But to leave government in the hands of any, who are selfish, ready to subvert the most honest laws to their own advantage, aka corporate America [and Astrayliar, and Britain, and Eurape, the leading few of many] and 'the golden calf tribe', ex-ancient Israel, demands that someone has to take the filthy, perceived as 'evil', Machiavellian job of enforcing proper laws.
If they don't, would you prefer Monsanto, BHP-Billiton, BP, Lloyds, HSBC banks, and private water corporations etc., to have total control, and really fuck your day?
Suck it up folks. Get your facts CORRECT, as to the ALL THINGS CONSIDERED reality of the times, about what we all gotto do regards land distribution, and use, and everyone's Ownership of it, as a Common Unity of a sentient, supposedly Intelligent Species.
Only if and when the species gets it's ECONOMICS Facts Correct, can we all take on the decentralization of government, to Local, hands-on management of our and the neighbors' lives, and land.
The Knowledge is out there! Waiting for YOU to find and dedicate your True Selves to learning it, and Quaffing the Nectar of ECONOMIC Truths.
[DISCLAMER; I am NOT responsible for this text! I'm but a puppet, listening to the higher mind and the knowledge it is open to channel.
As Henry George wrote,
"Don't believe me! Think for your selves!!" [paraphrased]
Sorry about this extra bit, but I edited the last piece, above, and added some, then the 'edit' facility disappeared, when I saw a typo and tried fix it...
So FUCK YOU ASSHOLES!
Proof, this site is controlled by the NWO fuckheads.
As I wrote, after
As Henry George wrote,
"Don't believe me! Think for your selves!!" [paraphrased]
[Thank you, and have AN HONEST Day.
I'd like to thank the Real Estate and Religions' FALSE GOD, FALSE JESUS industries for keeping me homeless for 19 years, leaving me no options but to focus on and write this type of diatribe.]
The only good cop is a DEAD COP!
The only good cop is six feet underground!
The only good cop is a DEAD COP!
Nobody's safe until there's no more around!
The only good realtor is a dead realtor
The only good priest is a dead priest......
THE UNITED STATES REJECTED AGENDA 21 ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO!
Conspiracy promoters like Deborah Tavares falsely claim that Agenda 21 is a U.N plan to expand the wilderness into areas already occupied by humans so as drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, none of this is so.
Agenda 21 was merely a suggestion that the United Nations recommended to all its member nations in 1992. Member nations were permitted, but not required to adopt Agenda 21 for themselves.
Under the United States Constitution, both the President and the Senate must consent to a proposed international treaty or convention before it becomes law in the United States. While the President ceremonially signed Agenda 21, the Senate withheld its consent to Agenda 21. As a result, the United States government REJECTED Agenda 21 almost 30 years ago, a fact which conspiracy promoters fraudulently conceal from their followers.
That means Agenda 21 never applied in the United States and does not apply in the United States now. So, whatever Agenda 21 "would have done" if it not been REJECTED is completely irrelevant. It was REJECTED.
Likewise so-called "Agenda 21 Map" is entirely FAKE and had nothing to do with Agenda 21 in the first place. Instead, the fake "Agenda 21 Map" was a wild exaggeration created by Michael Coffman to generate United States Senate opposition to "The U.N. Treaty On Bio-Diversity", something entirely different from Agenda 21. (This is why the fake map only depicts the United States, rather than all member nations of the United Nations.), As it turned out, the United States Senate also rejected The U.N. Treaty On Bio-Diversity. So, neither Agenda 21 nor The U.N. Treaty On Bio-Diversity (which the fake "Agenda 21 Map" allegedly illustrated) ever applied in the United States. BOTH WERE REJECTED.
The mere fact that some elected local governments have since passed regulations to protect the remaining environment has NOTHING to do with Agenda 21. These elected local governments merely concluded (entirely on their own) that some protection of the environmental made sense.
FOR PROOF, CLICK ON POST #5 HERE. REMEMBER, POST #5 HERE. Google "The Hoaxes Of Deborah Tavares", or click here. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?130336-The-hoaxes-of-...(conspiracy-weaponized-weather-fires-depopulation)&
OTHER FAKE LEGAL EXPERTS
For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS, click here.
For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, click here.
For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, click here.
For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES, click here.
For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, click here.
For the hoaxes of DEBORAH TAVARES, click here.
I thought that you should know.
All My Best,