Tags:
Sarah Palin rallies fans, defends 'Duck Dynasty'
Sarah Palin posted a note on her Facebook page that has already garnered more than 10,000 comments. She's coming to the defense of Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson, who was put on "indefinite hiatus" from his hit reality show Monday night for anti-gay remarks he made to GQ magazine.
Palin, sharing a photo of herself with the Duck Dynasty cast, wrote:
"Free speech is an endangered species. Those 'intolerants' hatin' and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2013/12/19/sarah-palin-defends-d...
HAHAHAAA, WELL, IT LOOKS LIKE SARAH PALIN HAS MORE BALLS THAN OUR ENTIRE MALE CONTINGENT OF CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS ALL TOGETHER. I guess that is what happens when congressmen and senators have never served in the military. Maybe that should become the newest rule... you can't serve in office, unless you can prove you have balls, or you served in the military.
Maybe this is what it will take, who would have known? I have never seen it myself, but I do know a lot of people who watch it and even spend their money on their stuff. Wow I wonder how much of that spent money could have been put to good use instead of crap you want be able to trade for a cracker if the SHTF.
Never heard of it myself. Watched the 1st episode. Lordy, the biggest concern I have is why do people watch so much of this mind-numbing crapola? The guy made some ignorant comments, A&E fired him; fully within their right to do so, & now all the bible-thumping bigots are having a hissy fit. Sheeple Divided & Conquered. Mission Accomplished. Pathetic.
see these ppl EVERY DAY,...live in a town fulla these fuchs already, why would I want to see MORE of that on the idiot box? Got a bud who has framed posters of these guys on his wall???...I don't get it either
BUT, I do think there's a solution in here somewhere, I see how the sheeple people are acting w/ this crew, NOW can we get one of these other guys to spout off that Gubmints bad, illegal and 9/11 was an inside job????.....BAM, ya just woke up 22.3 million idiot sheeple!!!
Would be nice.
Aaaah, do you have proof that the only people having a hissy fit over this are "Bible thumping bigots"? It would be nice if you had included evidence they are the only ones, since I am not a Bible thumping bigot, but I am outraged over the fact that no only censorship is being enforced, but politically correct thinking is being programmed into everyone. Like you are proving. You have no outrage over one of our most fundamental freedoms being attacked by fascists if you don't tow the party line and since they are teaching gay sex in school, it appears the agenda is an attack on the family and I bet that is leading to eventual attack on reproductive rights so the state eventually can clone and then raise the children of the nation.
If you have not been following this issue, I can assure you there is more to this than just your shallow take on it.
It's not a free speech issue. The inbred hick ain't in jail. He spewed his crap (his right) & A&E fired him (their right).
I'm with you on this Petunia, it is a free speech issue and A&E had no right to fire him, he can sue the Fuke out of them, if he wanted to teach these gay enablers a lesson.
Were told to STFU and sit down because of BS PC BS
Ok hears a good read on the subject, HEAR!
A&E’s suspension of Phil Robertson from the hit show “Duck Dynasty” has generated a lot of talk about the First Amendment.
While technically it’s not a First Amendment issue because the government was not involved, the punishing of Robertson for expressing his well-known beliefs in an interview with GQ goes to the larger issue of free speech and tolerance for differing views.
A&E has a right to fire anyone it chooses.
I think A&E Violated Robertsons constitutional right to free speech, and this writer says No, because the government is not involved, he may be right, I'm no lawyer, I really think a corporation can violate our rights and can then be held liable for the damages done. that would be the rest of the money for the term contract plus any other damages?
A cooperation, person or business can violate our first amendment constitutional rights, that just doesn't sound right.
if this is how it is, then the government could use cooperations to violate our rights.
If you can prove that the company in question has control in some way over the government then you can sue it for wrong doing since it is acting as an "agent" of the government, and that means accountability goes along with the power to act as gov agent. example is Goldman sachs employees working in treasury or Federal reserve, its just no one has thought to test the thesis yet. That time is coming soon. My guess, that will be the last ditch effort by dissidents to see if any part of the system still works by going through the courts. If not, then it will be the case of last resort..... frankly, I would rather be dead fighting these perverts and satanists than to ever live the way they do, mired in the filth of darkness and spiritless existance, what a dark and horrible way to live.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
© 2024 Created by truth. Powered by