Comment

Comment by CHUCK W. on August 18, 2010 at 11:46am

BRO, I HAVE THE SEEDS TO LAST TEN YEARS WITHOUT
HARVESTING SEEDS. I TAKE THIS VERY SERIOUSLY.
HAVE YOU READ, "SEEDS OF DESTRUCTION?" I OBTAINED MY COPY FROM GLOBAL RESEARCH.
I'LL BRING IT WITH ME!!

Comment by CHUCK W. on August 18, 2010 at 10:25am

Sugar Beets- Monsanto Wins Again
Posted by CHUCK W. on August 18, 2010 at 9:50am
View My Blog
Admin OptionsEdit Post
Add Tags

Cancel
Delete Post
Edit Blog Posts
Sugar Beets- Monsanto Wins Again
By Cassandra Anderson
August 17, 2010

Last Friday a federal judge imposed a nationwide ban on GMO sugar beets and it was overturned the next business day. Sugar beets comprise 50% of the sugar used in US food, and 95% of the sugar beets grown in the US are GMO. It is the jurisdiction of the US Department of Agriculture to determine whether plants are environmentally safe; this case is about whether the plants can cross pollinate (by wind, insects, etc) and contaminate other plants. This could have cost Monsanto billions of dollars.



Less than 2 weeks ago, wild growing canola in North Dakota was discovered to be 86% GMO. Because GMO crops are crossed with herbicide resistant plants (usually weeds), they grow like weeds and contaminate natural plants. Alarmingly, two of the canola samples collected by scientists showed that multiple genes from different species of GMO canola plants cross pollinated without cultivation, and probably for several generations. The implication of this is that GMO seeds can readily contaminate natural seeds and become out of control.

The GMO alfalfa ban lawsuit about contamination was the first GMO case ever heard by the Supreme Court, despite countless lawsuits from farmers whose fields have been polluted by GMOs. The sugar beet ban was overturned, based on a Supreme Court decision (7-1), which lifted the nationwide ban on GMO alfalfa in June.

The Supreme Court ruling stated that the nationwide GMO alfalfa ban was too broad, so it was lifted; an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be performed by the USDA is still pending. GMO crops are environmentally dangerous because they can readily spread, as proven by the wild GMO plants found in North Dakota. The Supreme Court never addressed the issue of whether GMO plants contaminate natural plants through cross pollination.

Remember that the appointed Supreme Court judges collect their paychecks from the federal government. The USDA co-owns a patent with Monsanto for the 'Terminator' gene (which make seeds go sterile after one harvest). Is the Supreme Court's loyalty to the federal government, in this case protecting the 'Terminator' patent owned by the USDA and its business-partner Monsanto, or is their loyalty to the American people?

The Supreme Court has never accepted a GMO food safety case, which falls under the jurisdiction of the corrupt FDA. Organ damage and sterility have been linked to a GMO food diet in lab animals.

Many of the organizations that represent farmers whose farms appear to be compromised. For instance, Andrew Kimbrell of the Center for Food Safety has another tax-exempt organization that is pursuing the removal of natural colloidal silver from public use and has accepted $1.75 million from the John Merck Fund, which has ties to the Rockefellers, who have been major financiers of biotechnology and food control for decades.

The Sierra Club's own website supports the United Nations Population Fund which has its roots in eugenics.

Earthjustice is another example of a tax-exempt organization that uses the Agenda 21 Sustainable Development model for "helping" people and the environment, when really the overall objective is to reduce the population. Earthjustice has a $30 million budget and they support the Sierra Club's mission against the "overriding threat of spiraling population growth and over consumption."

Monsanto's GMOs, which no one would want if they fully understood the health and contamination dangers, have thoroughly infiltrated America's farms and food supply by way of government regulations, which is how monopolies are created. The Rockefellers have practiced food control for generations and fund biotechnology. The US government has worked in opposition to farmers and public health in granting Monsanto patents on seeds, thus enabling Monsanto's licensing agreements with farmers that keep the farmers paying royalties even after they stop growing Monsanto products. The United Nations has been complicit in spreading GMO seeds across the world through WTO regulations and other means. Many environmental NGOs are accredited through the UN, "non-profit" organizations (tax-exempt is a better description because many of these 501(c)3 organizations reap plenty of profits) and tax-exempt foundations all work together to pursue the Agenda 21 Sustainable Development goals of depopulation and total control, using the environment as the excuse. For the full analysis of Food & Depopulation, please click on these links:

The Rockefeller Family- Part One

Monsanto's Monopoly- Part Two

Internaional Takeover by the UN- Part Three

Scams & Solutions- Part Four

The Supreme Court decision that lifted the nationwide GMO alfalfa ban because it was "too broad", means that if GMOs are to be banned, it is up to the States and local governments, so please send this article to your State and local government represtentatives.

Comment by humantshirts on July 14, 2010 at 5:23am

Comment by humantshirts on July 14, 2010 at 5:22am

welcome to the NEW WORLD ORDER, NOW EAT OUR POISON FROM MONSANTOS AND TYSON. AND DIE SLAVES YOU DIE. i been telling you its not a conspiracy theory its a FACT. stop being a sheeple and WAKE UP.

Comment by humantshirts on July 14, 2010 at 5:22am

Comment by humantshirts on July 8, 2010 at 3:27am

Comment by peter b dunn on July 7, 2010 at 9:35pm

after informing staff at our local community centre re J.P holdrens eco science book populatiion resources and environment, the problems with processed grains and other matters, they ignore the warnings and continue to purchase a dearer product which is worse for one than the cheaper raw sugar, but when one puts to them "so we can have steak for lunch tomorrow?" they reply "We cant afford that" but they continue to buy teh Poision white refined sugar for attendees consumption, In my opinion Theyre in on teh eugenics plan or brainwashed, you tell them tell them but they ignore you,,,,,,

Dear Maxyne,

thank you for you reply, I trust you and your volunteers are now, and in the future will be informed and not proport that white sugar is better for you than raw. Or Cheaper.
Yes it would be nice to have a CHOICE of sugars at our local community hall and one may find that the white sugar may remain un used . As one isnt privy to all attendees medical conditiions or aliments, isnt it prudent to give/offer people sugar with some vitamin value still left in it, and not some chemically polished poision that leaches the vitamins from ones bones..
Thank you for your efforts in providing healthy nutritious meals to our community for their benefit, and i trust you are aware of the Eugenics plan to use SOFT KILL substances to further their DEPOPULATION plans.
This type of thinking will be resisted by all true Australina Patriots who have a duty of care to wards their fellow Australians.

regards

peter



> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 08:49:27 +1000
> From: wcp@1earth.net
> To: peterbdunn@live.com.au
> Subject: Re: to maxine Re White Sugar!!!
>
> Thank you for that informatio, we will look into it.all i can say sugar is in nearly
> everything you eat bread, cereals and processed foods. I suggest that seeing as
> you are so distressed about the ingredients in sugar. Therefore it is your choice
> whether you eat white sugar or not. thanks maxyne
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 4th, 2010 at 12:39 AM, peter dunn wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/10/20/sugar-processed-white-su...
> poison-4-deadly-whites-rice-flour-sugar-salt-1
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Maxinne and all Volunteer Staff under your employ or
> > control,
> >
> >
> >
> > Please be advised as follows...
> >
> >
> >
> > Sugar - Processed White Sugar Is A Terrible Poison
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Refined grains are refined and preserved with chemicals; chemicals
> > that we end up eating and are hard on our bodies.
> >
> > Refined grains cause our bodies to make excess mucous that
> > accumulates in our noses, sinuses, throats, bronchial tubes, and our
> > lungs, causing us to sniff, blow, drain, and cough and, often times,
> > leading to more frequent colds and respiratory problems.
> >
> > Refined grains cause the calcium to be depleted from our bones,
> > increasing our chances of getting osteoporosis.
> >
> > Refined grains are broken down in our digestive system and absorbed
> > too quickly into the blood stream. This upsets the blood sugar
> > levels, exhausting the pancreas and/or the adrenal glands, triggering
> > hypoglycemic and diabetic reactions. Refined grains are just as bad
> > for people with diabetes as white sugar.
> >
> > In fact, refined grains are just plain bad for all of us, and we pay
> > a hefty price for eating them—premature diseases and early deaths.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sugar is highly correlated with the growth of cancer cells. Cancer,
> > such as cancers of the breast, ovaries, intestines, prostate, and
> > rectum, is thought to thrive on sugar.
> >
> > Sugar causes the body to become over-acid. When the body is
> > over-acid, it must pull calcium from the bones to neutralize the
> > acidity. Along with animal products and salt, sugar is another
> > contributor to osteoporosis
> >
> >
> >
> > Pleae be advised if I observe that white sugar "Poision" is served
> > up to members of my local community I willhave No Option but to
> > lodge a complaint with your employer for an on behalf of the residents for our Health.
> >
> >
> >
> > And besides it is dearer for your budgetory allocation than Raw
> > sugar.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Peter B Dunn
> >
> > A todd street resident
> >
> > 4/ june 2010
so its our choice but they only offer one teh poision tehy puropsley purchase.. DOOOHHHH.......

Comment by Carol J Burns on June 28, 2010 at 12:40pm

EU hails success of new food safety regime
http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/Quality-Safety/EU-hails-success-...
Monsanto Soybean Claims Probed by West Virginia (Update2)
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-25/monsanto-soybean-claims...
Genetically Altered Salmon Get Closer to the Table

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/business/26salmon.html?src=tptw

Comment by humantshirts on June 23, 2010 at 10:49am

Comment by Randy on June 22, 2010 at 4:52pm

I fixed the link Ronald. Thanks Troy. -Randy

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page