Anonymous supporters of Julian Assange outside the Embassy of Ecuador in Knightsbridge, central London, as the row between the UK and Ecuador grows. [4]
Can you imagine if this kind of scenario was happening elsewhere in the world and what kind of outcry would follow?
What if one of us, was say in China, Iran, Syria or anywhere else in fact, and that we genuinely believed our liberty and life was at stake by that countries regime, so we then decided to go to the British or USA Embassy’s to be given help and granted asylum, - though instead of that country respecting the international agreements set in place, in regards to an embassy’s status, - albeit, it’s as if it’s the country itself, - the host country then decides to then flaunt these agreements and raid the British or USA embassy in order to get to a man on a trumped up sex charge. It’s not as if Assange is some kind of international drug or arms dealer, nor is he an armed robber or terrorist.
This is like declaring war on Ecuador, and why William Hague must resign, he has made such a massive diplomatic blunder, that there is no other way this can be resolved. Ecuador has considered Assange’s case, and rightly so granted him asylum. This decision, right or wrong, must be respected, as does the due process of international law.
Ecuador's Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino announces that Ecuador would grant asylum to WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange. [4]
Police officers move the protesters in support of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange from the front of the Ecuadorian Embassy. [4]
But will this happen? I don’t think so. Assange has a lot of global support, as well as many supporters in the UK. The British [and US] government know it’s going to be a controversial judgement and action to take by raiding the Ecuadorian embassy, - so could we well see a "reason" for the police or SAS to do so, by perhaps some kind of ‘False Flag’ situation to arise?
Demonstrators trample on a British flag during a protest outside the United Kingdom's embassy in Quito, Ecuador as the row escalates.[4]
Demonstrators hold a sign reading 'British and gringos are the same thing' as they shout slogans outside the British Embassy in Quito yesterday as they protest against the UK's threat. [4]
Protesters are gathering outside the Ecuadorian embassy, outrage is filtering through South America. Everyone is aware the problems the UK are having with Argentina and its sovereignty rights of the Falkland Islands. So this is like a smack in the mouth to them, as it sends out a wider message in general.
I fear some kind of Black-Ops ‘lone-wolf’ patsy, will appear from the protesting crowds in London, and perhaps shoot someone, or worst, and very much like the same way how WPC Yvonne Fletcher was shot and killed on the 17th April 1984. Her death resulted in the Metropolitan Police Service laying siege to the Libyan embassy for the next eleven days, and the United Kingdom severing all diplomatic relations with Libya.
Two years later it became a major factor in Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s decision to allow US President Ronald Regan to launch the US bombing of Libya in 1986 from American bases in the United Kingdom.
Yvonne Fletcher [5]
Yvonne Fletcher (15 June 1958 – 17 April 1984) was a British police officer fatally shot during a protest outside the Libyan embassy in London, in 1984. Fletcher, who had been on duty and deployed to police the protest, died shortly afterwards at Westminster Hospital.
The demonstration had been organised by the Libyan National Salvation Front (LNSF) following the execution of two students who had criticised Gaddafi. Since February 1984, the Libyan embassy, which was also known as the Libyan People’s Bureau, had been staffed by "revolutionary committees" made up of students loyal to Gaddafi who had assumed control of the embassy with the tacit approval of the Libyan government. They were not professional diplomats.[1][2] Gaddafi loyalists at the embassy warned police that they intended to mount a counter-demonstration.
On the day, about 75 protesters arrived by coach from northern England. The demonstration began peacefully as police successfully kept the two sides apart with crowd control barriers. Both groups shouted at each other and waved banners and placards. Loud music was played from the embassy in an apparent attempt to drown out the noise of the protesters.[3] Without warning, automatic gunfire was discharged into the anti-Gaddafi protesters at 10:18 am. Eleven people were hit, including the unarmed Fletcher who was fatally wounded in the stomach.
Not forgetting what happened at the Iranian Embassy siege took place from 30 April to 5 May 1980, after a group of six armed men stormed the Iranian embassy in South Kensington, London. The gunmen took 26 people hostage—mostly embassy staff, but several visitors and a police officer, who had been guarding the embassy, were also held. By the sixth day of the siege the gunmen had become increasingly frustrated at the lack of progress in meeting their demands. That evening, they killed one of the hostages and threw his body out of the embassy.
As a result, the British government ordered the Special Air Service (SAS), a special forces regiment of the British Army, to conduct an assault to rescue the remaining hostages. Shortly afterwards, soldiers abseiled from the roof of the building and forced entry through the windows. During the 17-minute raid, the SAS rescued all but one of the remaining hostages, and killed five of the six terrorists
We must lookout for Assange and his kind, and be by their side, if and when they need our help and protection, - because after all, - who really is Julian Assange?
Well the answer is obvious, - he is you, me, and every single one of us;...I‘m Julian Assange!- and we should never forget that.
William Hague
We urge people from around the world to contact 10 Downing Street demanding the resignation of William Jefferson Hague, FRSL, MP (born 26 March 1961) is a British politician, who is the current Foreign Secretary and First Secretary of State.
Contact Number 10 - Please use the e-mail to contact 10 Downing Street. https://email.number10.gov.uk/Contact.aspx
“The United States must dissolve its FBI investigation, the United States must vow that it will not seek to prosecute our staff or our supporters. The United States must pledge before the world that it will not pursue journalists for shining a light upon the secret crimes of the powerful.”
Assange said the U.S. was facing a momentous choice: “Will it return to and reaffirm the revolutionary values it was founded on, or will it lurch across the precipice, dragging us all into a dangerous and oppressive world in which journalists fall silent under the fear of prosecution and citizens must whisper in the dark?” [6]
[1] ^ Dean, Lucy. (2003). The Middle East and North Africa 2004: 2004. Routledge. p. 779. ISBN 978-1-85743-184-1.
[2] ^ Ham, Anthony. (2007). Libya. Lonely Planet. p. 41. ISBN 978-1-74059-493-6.
[3] ^ Jeffers, Harry Paul (1992). Bloody business: an anecdotal history of Scotland Yard. Pharos Books. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-88687-678-4.
[4] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2188946/Julian-Assange-gran...
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yvonne_Fletche
[6] http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/08/assange-speech-at-embassy/
Comment
I know Honeygirl, he does remain silent on many issues, - though is this because it the situation he is under, does he not have to tred carefully during this legal wrangle and wait until the end of it, before he might change his tune? That's why I'm happy staying with the Freedom of Free Speech agenda, and will watch closely what's going to happen. I can see Julain Assange wanting to run his own political party, though he can't in the UK, though if he were to, then it's quiet possible he'd beat the other party leaders, hands down!!??
Yes DTOM, well pointed out about the death of Yvonne Fletcher. You're bang on about Vague Hague. There's a year difference between our ages. I remember seeing him when he was about 16yrs old addressing a Conservative conference, I thought, feck, what a creepy little chap. I too am shocked about this 9/11 lark, and really am surprised he takes that few. Do you not think he's playing to a sector of the American public and PTB, that he's not going to pick a fight with them about 9/11? As what are Assanges real views on this matter?
I was dragged down the street by police when he appeared in court in 2010, after he was remanded to Wandsworth prison. I was just standing there with a Free Assange poster. And I too have always been in two minds, and remain so. So will go with the flow and see what and how this develops!
Yes this in a job for Ian Fleming
I never hear about Assange even mention the New World Order or attempt to help or reach out to
9-11 truthers
Honey has voiced the same thoughts and concerns that I have on this matter.
I've always been in two minds about Assange and Wikileaks.
I find it odd that he refuses to address the 9/11 issue, yet there are the recent extreme DoS attacks on Wikileaks for the TrapWire exposure, something that appears, on the surface, to have greatly angered the PTB.
The 'boy' Hague is a raving zionist, opportunist and consistent failure.
That said, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if there was an attempt to draw out dissenters in the UK. The amount of energy, money, time and resources being invested in this witch hunt, points to this being far more than it appears on first glance.
Yvonne Fletcher was not shot with a Sterling 9mm submachinegun fired from the Libyan Embassy on April 17 1984. Audio from the day and ballistics reports point to the fact that she was shot with 3 round burst fired from a rifle chambered for the 7.62mm NATO round. The late Joe Vialls wrote some interesting material on this, some years ago. - http://vialls.homestead.com/yvonnefletcher.html
That's what's quiet fascinating about the whole thing. No one really knows for sure what side Assange is batting for? Lot of rumours, and there are intriging links and scenarios connected to him. It's getting rather dangerous, as it's calling out the president of the US and the UK leaders among others. I have always backed Assange, for I stand what he puports to stand for. I can only tolerate the truth, bs, I can't. Whatever the outcome, I will stand by him, for as we know, we are all Julian Assange! If it wasn't his head in the noose, then it be someone elses. We all have to stand firmly together to protect Free Speech, otherwise I'm fucked!! In a sense, it's already a big pyscop mission, for the want to shit the life out of people for even wanting to fart. They want to supress the truth like they always have, - but there's a double edge sword at play, a white hat and black hat kind of scene is being acted out...both serving each others objectives. But as I say, this is sending out the strongest kind of message to all other whistle-blowers, that want us scared. I hope I'm wrong, but it seems that the way the British and especially the American politicians act, they don't like long drawn out games, the longer they leave it the bigger it's going to get, Assanges support will grow and grow. So I reckon they'd love to get their hands on him even more now, for his recent statement tells them exaclty what he expects, and they want to show us how powerful they are. But the worlds eyes are watching every moment, will they let this go on for years and years? I doubt it, will they just rush the ebmasssy and arrest him, I doubt it, for they will be breaking a lot of international laws etc. - So what they need is an excuse that will permit them to enter the embassy. I often wonder what kind of Operation Ian Fleming would have come with?
could Assange and this whole thing be one big pyscop/false flag mission i wonder ? Is this all a distraction to draw dissenters out ?
Cheers Nathan
Assange Calls on U.S. to End ‘Witchhunt’ Against WikiLeaks
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/08/assange-speech-at-embassy/
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
© 2024 Created by truth. Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network