Comment

Comment by bryan l on December 28, 2010 at 1:52am

i don't see why we don't use this statement?

Comment by Mike Florey on August 23, 2009 at 7:42am

Globally or locally, I'll work to dismantle the NWO. For now, however, I like the statement.

Comment by bys on August 19, 2009 at 11:36pm

When was the U.S. ever headed in the right direction? I ask this not to be pessimistic or sarcastic but to be informed.

Comment by peter b dunn on July 28, 2009 at 11:55pm

ummm a bit where we attest to the beauty of the Human spirit and species and that we endorse, truth... supporeted by factual evidence in an effort to share knowledge, which is power in itself or which ever way you can /want to put it? may bee jsut havin an input but im more than impressed with the statement as is. :-)

Comment by CHUCK W. on July 28, 2009 at 1:26pm

VINCE MY FRIEND,
READ YOUR MISSION STATEMENT.......
CAUSED ME TO THINK BACK OVER YEARS I'VE CALLED YOU FRIEND
AND HOW MUCH YOUR VIEWS ON THE NWO HAVE CHANGED. NOT ONLY
THE NWO, BUT OBAMA, ETC. THANK YOU!!
CJW

Comment by Rambling Rose on July 26, 2009 at 6:16am

Is it just the "New world Order" or is it "any entity, especially the New World Order, that threatens to degrade individuality and destroy basic human freedoms."

Comment by WTRH-AM-AE on July 17, 2009 at 8:07pm

12.160 is just a shortwave frequency. The SW frequency is subject to change without further notice by WWCR. What's going to happen when this change occurs?. What we might need to do is come up with a new name to avoid
change all of the time. It's like this, when I could not get my transmitter on the
air on 1620 kHz I decided to use 540 kHz which produces a real good ground wave signal since this signal is very low power and can only travel locally around the apartment complex, but you still need a tunable AM loop antenna to get the station in better.

Comment by revolutionist on July 17, 2009 at 3:36pm

It's very good.

Comment by Daniel F Swain on July 16, 2009 at 4:00pm

I would like to add another opion, I believe this statement,

"We seek global peace"

is a unrealistic expression of our goal, alltough it is a embracing concept, in order to embrace this concept we would have to impose our values on the world. This causes us to be a infiltraiter.

Maybe it should read,

"We seek to lead the world by our example of peace."

Just an observation and not intended to ridicule or take away from your hard work.

Dan

Comment by Dee on June 29, 2009 at 8:45pm

Nice job Vince.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page