Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Less Prone on February 26, 2024 at 3:57pm

A translation...

Brazil is a country inherited by a colonizing elite who inherited ownership, while the United States of America is a country built by a founding elite who assumed ownership.

It is a question of ATTITUDE, of facing historical facts and accepting them, now, and being able to make History, now.

We can start with a debate on a topic that will be of vital importance for the UNITED STATES OF BRAZIL, a nation based on respect for INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, PRIVATE PROPERTY and the FAMILY as an entity that forms the culture, language and history of the nation.

City expenses must be paid from city resources.

Thus, it would be up to the Political Parties to offer a Multi-annual Plan, based on the political action of their candidates, for the executive and legislative elections. Thus, during the period of the current legislature (4 years) candidates could carry out a needs assessment and choose solution providers.

During party primaries to choose candidates, the PPA would be presented to the public, by each party. The people would know which PPA to vote for, they would know how much it would cost and who would do the work.

So, there would be no need to have a (federal) budget for the city, as during the election it would already be known what should be done, how much it would cost and who would do the work.

Those elected would have to adjust the PPA of each victorious party in the election to serve the city in the best possible way. And the city's budget would be limited to the PPA that each party presented in the elections.

Therefore, there would be no need for these taxes nor the “redistribution of income”, as only what could be paid would be spent.

Thus, for a true Federation, there would be no municipal, state or federal budget, as the needs would have been satisfied in each city.

A Federal Contribution of, for example, 9%, on each business, sale or service provided, could constitute the budget of the city, the state and the federation, and the STATE and the GOVERNMENT should fit within the 3% that each federative entity would receive .

• ▶ Reply