9/11-sceptic drags newspaper in court

 

Niels Harrit will not tolerate to be compared to holocaust deniers and creationists and therefore pulls Weekendavisen (the weekend newspaper) in court

 

The big question is why the two direct hits of the Twin Towers in New York on 11 september 2001, caused a third skyscraper to collapse.

 And the little question is whether you can afford to call people who doubt the authorities' official explanations for crazy. And this last question, is Copenhagen City Court now decide if it is for retired chemistry professor Niels Harrit.

 

In a summons requiring him as a journalist and an editor from Weekendavisen convicted for violation of Penal Code § 267, because it Weekendavisen on 7 December, 2012, to read the following in an article on the Royal. Library exhibition on the Armenian Genocide:

Harrit and other fools

'Should we have a poster with creationist con men hanging in one of the finest information institutions I Denmark? Why not just invite Niels Harrit and the other fools from 9/11 skeptic community in, now we're at it? What about the Holocaust denier movement? The article said and Niels Harrit - who sees the word ‘crazies’ as degrading - believes that Weekendavisen text is particularly patronizing because he is compared to holocaust deniers and creationists.

 

No one has refuted my arguments

  - I have publicly stated that the three towers that after the attack on 11 September, 2001, collapsed in Manhattan, New York, can NOT collapse as a result of the two crashes of the twin towers - and certainly not in the way that the collapse took place. And I as a scientist raised a number of scientific arguments for this, which neither Weekendavisen or anyone else has been able to refute, writes Niels Harrit, which requires that the newspaper publish the judgment incl. why in the first place this article was published.

 

But what do you mean? Do you call people who allow themselves to ask questions and argue for them, for crazies?

SOURCE: http://ekstrabladet.dk/nationen/article1896038.ece

Views: 49

Reply to This

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted blog posts
19 minutes ago
tjdavis posted videos
11 hours ago
tjdavis posted photos
15 hours ago
Larry Harmen posted blog posts
20 hours ago
Larry Harmen posted videos
21 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on Less Prone's photo
Thumbnail

Rebuilding Khazaria

"Perhaps Russia and Ukraine should Rebuild the Tartarian Empire. Then game over. "
yesterday
cheeki kea commented on FREEDOMROX's blog post NEVER FORGET! WHO and UN charged with GENOCIDE in 2009
"This is Why the outlier countries Must Stand Up And Fight Them Off on all fronts at all times. For…"
yesterday
cheeki kea posted a blog post

Dr. Aseem Malhotra's Explosive Court Testimony on COVID "Vaccines"(UPDATED)

 Doctor Malhotra drops arsenal of truth bombs on Helsinki. A spectacular display. Here are few snip…See More
yesterday
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post They Want to Murder Trump!
yesterday
Less Prone posted a photo
yesterday
rlionhearted_3 posted a photo
yesterday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
Doc Vega commented on tjdavis's photo
Thumbnail

reminders

"Wow how ironic! "
Sunday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Epitaph at 5:00 AM

Epitaph at 5:00 AM Carrying around my regrets like a spear in my chestTalking to people who…See More
Sunday
Less Prone commented on KLC's group MUSICWARS
"Walk like a Joe Biden"
Sunday
Less Prone favorited Sandy's photo
Sunday
Less Prone favorited cheeki kea's photo
Sunday
Less Prone replied to MAC's discussion GAIN OF FUNCTION CRIMINALS ARE SQUIRMING
Sunday
Sandy posted photos
Sunday
cheeki kea commented on tjdavis's photo
Thumbnail

Child play

"Here's an online blast from the past (20/04/2016) -~of cause the video of the dog in question…"
Sunday

© 2024   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted