Collapse of WTC Building Seven: British Man Won Law Suit against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up

read article

Horsham, UK, 2013 – Tony Rooke, in an act of civil disobedience, refused to pay the mandatory £130 TV license fee claiming it violates Section 15 of the Terrorism Act. Rooke’s accusation was aimed at the BBC who reported the collapse of WTC 7 over 20 minutes before it actually fell, and the judge accepted Rooke’s argument. While it was not a public inquiry into 9/11, the recognition of the BBC’s actions on September 11th are considered a small victory, one that was never reported in the US.

Today was an historic day for the 9/11 truth movement,” Peter Drew of AE911Truth UK told Digital Journal, “with over 100 members of the public attending, including numerous journalists from around the UK as well as from across other parts of Europe.”

Under Section 363 of the Communications Act, citizens of the UK are required to purchase an annual license in order to use a television receiver. Rooke refused to pay the license fee due to a section of the Terrorism Act that states:

It is an offence for someone to invite another to provide money, intending that it should be used, or having reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used, for terrorism purposes.

The fact that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty-three minutes before it actually fell indicates that the UK was aware of the attacks on 9/11 before they actually happened. The direct implication is that they were working with the “terrorists”, all arguments as to who the terrorists actually were aside.

Here is a broadcast of the BBC’s announcement that WTC 7 (Salomon Brothers Building) collapsed when it was still standing behind the reporter:

Rooke had been given a six-month conditional discharge and told to pay £200 after admitting that he owned a television and watched it without a license. He represented himself at Horsham Magistrates’ Court in West Sussex.

Mr. Rooke puts the basis of his defence under Section 15 of the Terrorism Act, effectively asking the court to find the BBC is a terrorist organisation and that if he continues to pay them he himself is committing a criminal offence.” – District Judge Stephen Nicholls

article-2284337-18470B00000005DC-34_306x523

In Rooke’s statement to the court:

I believe the BBC, who are directly funded by the licence fee, are furthering the purposes of terrorism and I have incontrovertible evidence to this effect. I do not use this word lightly given where I am.”

Although he was not allowed to show his video evidence in court due to the District Judge deeming it irrelevant to the trial, the fact that the BBC reported WTC 7’s collapse over 20 minutes beforehand proved to be evidence enough.

He also made reference to the theories behind the collapse of WTC 7 being a controlled demolition, as the evidence suggests. In an additional statement:

The BBC reported it 20 minutes before it fell. They knew about it beforehand. Last time I was here I asked you (the judge): ‘Were you aware of World Trade Centre 7?’ You said you had heard of it. Ten years later you should have more than heard of it. It’s the BBC’s job to inform the public. Especially of miracles of science and when laws of physics become suspended.

“They have made programmes making fools of and ridiculing those of us who believe in the laws of gravity. American reports have shown that the fall was nothing but a controlled demolition.

“I am not looking at who demolished it—that is impossible—but the BBC actively tried to hide this from the public.”

In response from Judge Nicholls:

Even if I accept the evidence you say, this court has no power to create a defence in the manner which you put forward.”

In light of the evidence the judge took into consideration, Rooke was given an unconditional discharge, which in British legal parlance means he “was convicted but he does not suffer the consequences of a conviction, and the conviction will be erased if he is not brought before the court for six months.” He was not required to pay the fee and non-payment fine either—only court costs of £200.

Views: 143

Reply to This

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Mrs. Tif Morgan replied to MAC's discussion Why NRA Is Raising A Red Flag Over "Red Flag" Laws
" Thank you for the update"
6 minutes ago
Mrs. Tif Morgan favorited MAC's discussion Why NRA Is Raising A Red Flag Over "Red Flag" Laws
6 minutes ago
Mrs. Tif Morgan posted a discussion

Man Who Walked Free After Putting Toddler In Hot Oven, Burns Another Child With Boiling Water

 A Florida man who escaped conviction last year after being accused of putting a 3-year-old girl in…See More
7 minutes ago
Diana posted photos
57 minutes ago
Diana commented on Raz Putin's photo
Thumbnail

"Clown News Network"

"When in Clown World..."
1 hour ago
Diana favorited Raz Putin's photo
1 hour ago
Diana favorited cheeki kea's photo
1 hour ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Darrell Rowlands's blog post Timeline of Fake Mass Shootings part 1
1 hour ago
Darrell Rowlands posted a blog post
2 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Doc Vega's blog post Invasion of the Body Snatchers For Real
2 hours ago
James Roberts favorited cheeki kea's photo
2 hours ago
JoeG favorited Raz Putin's photo
2 hours ago
Sabbatai Zevi favorited Less Prone's blog post The Crunch Is Back, There’s Going To Be A Gold Standard, And It Will Be Disastrous
3 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post Racism Is Bad,’ Says White Woman Who Oversees Systematic Annihilation Of Minorities
"These types of white women are a disgrace to the race, they'll all flock to the death of the…"
4 hours ago
cheeki kea posted a video
5 hours ago
cheeki kea favorited MAC's video
6 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted