5G is Part of Sterlizing the Goyim — Not Allowed in Israel

Robert David Steele
Public Intelligence Blog

Alert Reader writes in:

Smart meters and mandatory vaccinations/pesticides are the “Final Solution” to the cattle goyim…especially the white anglo saxon protestants! 1G, 2G, 3G and 4G use between 1 to 5 gigahertz frequency. 5G uses between 24 to 90 gigahertz frequency. Within the RF Radiation portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, the higher the frequency the more dangerous it is to living organisms. 5G, developed in Israel, is exported — it is FORBIDDEN in Israel.

The safety of 5G technology is finally being brought into serious q...

Genetic sequencing science breakthrough just proved that measles “o...

RELATED (Long Input from Alert Reader):

*The most referred to site for these studies is
https://www.emf-portal.org/en – Univ of Aachen. I corresponded with the
director of this site, asking how many of their current 27,000+
published NIR studies show harm? She said for an advocacy rule of thumb
use 20,000. David Carpenter was copied in and also estimates 20,000.
Moskowitz doesn’t seem to object. As everyone knows who has even a
little familiarity with the EMR field, Carpenter (SUNY Albany, co-author
of /Bio-initiative Report/, a summary of several hundred of the best of
these studies) and Moskowitz (U Cal Berkeley) are the most influential
scientists in EMR in N. America.

*Carpenter’s site is the Bio-Initiative site, updated 2017:
**https://bioinitiative.org/*

*with Henry Lai’s Research Summaries:
****https://bioinitiative.org/research-summaries/*

*Moskowitz’s site: * *https://www.saferemr.coma href="https://www.saferemr.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.saferemr.com/>/*

*Here are links to many of those 20,000 or so studies*

EMR INSTITUTIONAL SITES
a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lZCADqKW4twIb5MIqhKFcO49KlPaER9zVpJiQ0hhsnQ/edit?usp=drive_web" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lZCADqKW4twIb5MIqhKFcO49KlPaER9...>

EMR GENERAL SITES
a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rQMR5fywlXDdr-UgpmBfmngVounsO5KQbxanBj4PXFs/edit?usp=drive_web" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rQMR5fywlXDdr-UgpmBfmngVounsO5K...>

*Obviously if there are about 20,000 published studies showing harm from
EMR, there are going to be thousands of scientists who have done those
studies who are aware of the acute dangers of childish, impulsive,
obsessive, and superficial dive into cell phones, smart meters, wifi,
and 5G (led by the US, and potentially prevented mainly by the IAA).
Here is a list of most of the visible scientists who know how dangerous
EMR can be, many of whom are warning about it (Maharishi warned about
it, and said not to use cell phones, and told all the Rajas to tell all
their Governors not to use cell phones):*

EMR SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS
a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oR--UQg9AUc0NKNwx4WMZAVQSekZtaHXTVDoFc8KyrA/edit?usp=drive_web" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oR–UQg9AUc0NKNwx4WMZAVQSekZtaHX...>

*The reason for many studies showing no harm from cell phones and other
EMR is: there are many poor studies, for two reasons: *

*1. Political and financial influence on the studies: Industry funded
studies are of lower quality, seemingly designed to show no harm (short
term, small sample, and incorrect EMR measuring)*

*2. Poor research method: two initial studies in 1976 showed harm but
were poorly done (they got lucky) but many studies were done after that
using that same poor research design and did not show harm (due to poor
research methods). *

*Political and financial influence: The three primary documents are:*

*1. **Hertsgaard and Dowie’s landmark expose in **/The Nation/ magazine:
**https://www.thenation.com/article/how-big-wireless-made-us-think-th...

*revised and published in /The Guardian/:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/14/mobile-phones-ca...

*2. Norm Alster’s landmark Harvard paper on FCC corruption:
https://ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/capturedag...

*3. Henry Lai’s survey EMR research showing that 2/3 of the research
funded by industry shows no harm, and 1/3 does not show harm – and in
research /_not_/ funded by industry, 2/3 shows harm and 1/3 does not
show harm, showing the high influence of who funds the research
(resulting in study designs of differing quality)*

*https://www.seattlemag.com/article/uw-scientist-henry-lai-makes-wav...

*2. Initial poorly done studies: Dr. De Kun Li (MD, PhD, MPH, Kaiser
Permanente) in the second of three 15 minutes presentations on a webinar
about a year ago describes what happened, mentioning some of his
research (strapping EMR measuring devices to the abdomens of pregnant
women and finding 250-500% increase in still births, infant ADHD, infant
obesity, and infant thyroid problems): *

***https://www.healthandenvironment.org/webinars/96433**

*So stating that ‘all EMR is harmless because some of it is good’ is
ridiculous, and solidly established and massively documented as invalid.
I suggest not continuing to reduce your credibility ever lower in the
community by continuing to use invalid arguments to oppose Maharishi’s
knowledge (yes, he made it firmly part of his knowledge) and the
thousands of good scientists who see through what is going on. *

*Made it firmly part of his knowledge? Yes, I spoke at length with a
Governor from Europe who Maharishi had go through every single room in
Vlodrop, including all private quarters, and regardless of any opposition, *

*1. remove all wifi*
*2. replace all CFL bulbs*
*3. rewire all appliances to ground them all*

*Maharishi told him to meet with him every day until he was done, and he
did, it took him a year. This was around 2006. *

*Saying that since light is beneficial, all EMR is beneficial or
harmless is like saying, since apples and hemlock are both plant
substances, and apples are good or OK to eat, so is hemlock. And that
would be similar to what would happen if people take your advice. *

*Although Alliant’s smart meter program is about 1% as dangerous as it
is being portrayed by FF Safe Meters. Alliant’s SM program is unique in
the country for only half a dz signals/day, that has been confirmed by
Dave Stetzer, the most reputable electrical engineer in the world
opposing smart meters and dirty electricity. He told me he left the Iowa
hearing because, “I’m not going to lie.” FF Safe Meters is vastly
exaggerating the health risk of Alliant’s program. Alliant disclosed it
had “2-4 malfunctioning meters signaling 3,000-11,000 times/week,” and
FF Safe Meter broadcast they had gotten Alliant to admit they had meters
signaling that amount but /_hid the fact it was only from 2-4
malfunctioning meters._/*

*Good to avoid both phase transition emotional extremes of ‘EMR is all
fine’ and ‘Alliant’s SMs are deadly.’ Both are quite invalid. It’s good
to opt out, it is not good to be highly concerned about Alliant’s smart
meter program for health reasons. It is good to be highly concerned
about the health risk from 5G (and all its other problems). There also
huge privacy and cyber security issues with smart meters and 5G, as well
as major local control and rights/freedom issues with both smart meters
and 5G. *

http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/03/heres-why-5g-is-not-allowed-...