Should Faking a Name on Facebook Be a Felony?
Should Faking a Name on Facebook Be a Felony?
Imagine that President Obama could order the arrest of anyone who broke a promise on the Internet. So you could be jailed for lying about your age or weight on an Internet dating site. Or you could be sent to federal prison if your boss told you to work but you used the company's computer to check sports scores online. Imagine that Eric Holder's Justice Department urged Congress to raise penalties for violations, making them felonies allowing three years in jail for each broken promise. Fanciful, right?
Think again. Congress is now poised to grant the Obama administration's wishes in the name of "cybersecurity."
The little-known law at issue is called the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. It was enacted in 1986 to punish computer hacking. But Congress has broadened the law every few years, and today it extends far beyond hacking. The law now criminalizes computer use that "exceeds authorized access" to any computer. Today that violation is a misdemeanor, but the Senate Judiciary Committee is set to meet this morning to vote on making it a felony.
The problem is that a lot of routine computer use can exceed "authorized access." Courts are still struggling to interpret this language. But the Justice Department believes that it applies incredibly broadly to include "terms of use" violations and breaches of workplace computer-use policies.
Breaching an agreement or ignoring your boss might be bad. But should it be a federal crime just because it involves a computer? If interpreted this way, the law gives computer owners the power to criminalize any computer use they don't like. Imagine the Democratic Party setting up a public website and announcing that no Republicans can visit. Every Republican who checked out the site could be a criminal for exceeding authorized access.
If that sounds far-fetched, consider a few recent cases. In 2009, the Justice Department prosecuted a woman for violating the "terms of service" of the social networking site MySpace.com. The woman had been part of a group that set up a MySpace profile using a fake picture. The feds charged her with conspiracy to violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Prosecutors say the woman exceeded authorized access because MySpace required all profile information to be truthful. But people routinely misstate the truth in online profiles, about everything from their age to their name. What happens when each instance is a felony?
Getty Images
In 2010, the Justice Department charged a defendant with unauthorized access for using a computer to buy tickets from Ticketmaster. Ticketmaster's website lets anyone visit. But its "terms of use" only permitted non-automated purchases, and the defendant used a computer script to make the purchases.
Continues
http://online.wsj.com/art...
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by cristian david on
-
does this apply to FBI agents who pose as someone else to "catch" people doing something that, in their imagination may be construed as "wrong"?
-
-
Permalink Reply by 2p4plpyayj8y3 on
-
This is the insanity of the Police State! You call this a happy medium where everything balances out? Does this apply to the Feds who think theyare above the law?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Anthony Kimbrough on
-
Good, the that makes all of the government Felons. Oh wait, the upper officials have diplomatic immunity don't they. Sooo, my thoughts then would be why are they entitled to taxpayer's money if they hold no allegiance to this country?What about the police who say that they are no obligated to tell the facts of what they can actually say and do? Is 1/2 truths a lie also?
-
-
Permalink Reply by noblsht on
-
Thanks James, for posting this story and keeping us informed, the majority of the brain-dead American population have no idea of the implications of this type of reckless legislation!!!
-
-
Permalink Reply by Robert Carobene on
-
They want to censor us all on the Internet!
-
-
-
The time is coming with Internet ID for everyone that goes online and they will follow all our moves as for me they will block me left and right from trying to destroy the Illuminati!
-
-
Permalink Reply by bryan l on
-
internet id will be programing for the next step. the chip under the skin. they have achieved reality threw social networks. people feel at one and united threw this medium. but all friends are miles away.
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=16929680703 -
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
"Les prone, Thanks Buddy! "
"Less Prone as usual the official version of the truth does not match the evidence and is labeled…"
"Charlie Kirk was getting very critical against Israel and had turned down a lucrative deal from the…"
The Army of Government Launched Psychopaths
They walk among us in most college towns. They seem relatively reasonable until political…See More
"Have to sign in to YT for this. So. What I do is to go to https://ytdown.io/en/ and download…"
"cheeki kea, you are spot on. The old guard is about to collapse! "
"cheeki kea, the Japanese thought they could expand their empire and exact enough damage on the US…"
NEW DOCUMENTARY - Dissent Into Madness
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/dissent-into-madness/What if the delusions of the dissidents are in fact real? What if their paranoid f...
"Japan served themselves up no favours by inching out into the South Pacific as they soon found out.…"
"Their plans did not work out because we are the news now, and the old news is the enemy. "
Alligator Creek and a Japanese Massacre
The year is 1942 just a few months after the Pearl Harbor disaster. Despite losses suffered by the…See More
CHARLIE KIRK WAS CNP! JOSH REEVES 9-11-25
"With all due respect this guy comes off as a drunken asshole and he didn't even know who…"
© 2025 Created by truth.
Powered by
