Individual mandate, Medicaid Expansion

Supremes should declare ObamaCare unconstitutional

Grace-Marie Turner Tuesday, March 27, 2012

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45534

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — ObamaCare is unconstitutional down to its very DNA.  The U.S. Supreme Court can save itself and the country years of litigation by striking down the entire law when it issues its decision this summer.

Two key provisions in the health overhaul law are being challenged in current case — the individual mandate and mandatory Medicaid expansion.

INDIVIDUAL MANDATE :

ObamaCare requires virtually everyone in the country to have health insurance starting in 2014.  This is the first time the federal government would require private citizens, under penalty of law, to spend their own money on a private product.  While there are subsidies for some, the policies will cost an average family as much as $20,000 by the time ObamaCare is fully up and running.

Never before has the Commerce Clause of the Constitution been used to compel private citizens who simply want to mind their own business to spend their own money and compel them to engage in commerce.

A new ABC News/Washington Post poll found that two-thirds of Americans say the court should throw out the whole law or at least the individual mandate, showing the depth of public opposition.

The individual mandate should be struck down because it isn’t protected under the Commerce Clause.

MEDICAID EXPANSION:

The law also requires states to expand their Medicaid programs to cover families earning up to $30,000 a year.  Lawyers for the 26 states that are challenging the law will tell the Court during oral arguments this violates the Tenth Amendment’s protection of states’ rights.

Medicaid, a program designed to pay medical expenses for the poor, is the largest health program in the country. Its costs already are drying up spending on education, roads, and public safety.  Many states warn this huge Medicaid expansion could send them into bankruptcy.

The Medicaid mandate should be struck by the Court as a violation of the Tenth Amendment.

The Court could strike the whole law as unconstitutional since it does not contain a “severability” clause.  Severability would have left the rest of the law in place if any one part is declared invalid.  But most observers believe the more likely scenario is that the Court would imply severability, possibly striking just the individual mandate but leaving most of the law standing.

Then what?

Look for lines to form at courts across the country with future challenges.

For example, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has warned it will sue to protect its First Amendment rights to religious liberty.  The bishops say there is simply no way that Catholic hospitals, universities and charities can comply with an Obama administration mandate requiring them to provide insurance policies that cover sterilization, contraption and drugs that cause early abortions.

The bishops say this would force them “to violate their own teachings within their very own institutions.”

Separately, the Goldwater Institute in Arizona is suing over ObamaCare’s Independent Payment Advisory Board, the rationing board that gives unprecedented power to 15 unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats to make spending decision for Medicare involving hundreds of billions of dollars.  The Constitution, under Article I, grants that power only to the people’s elected representatives in Congress.

The list could go on — and does.

ObamaCare bashes into the Constitution at every turn because it is fundamentally in conflict to the essential founding principles of this country — freedom and the sovereignty of states and citizens.  It turns control over one-sixth of our economy to the federal government, ceding life and death decisions to the state.

ObamaCare is wrong for America, and the sooner the Supreme Court overturns it, the sooner we can get on the path to patient-centered reform that fits our economy — and our Constitution.