Drone Pilots Could Be Tried For War Crimes

Drone Pilots Could Be Tried for ‘War Crimes,’ Law Prof Says

* By Nathan Hodge Email Author
* April 28, 2010 |
* 4:15 pm |
* Categories: Drones
*

The pilots waging America’s undeclared drone war in Pakistan could be liable to criminal prosecution for “war crimes,” a prominent law professor told a Congressional panel Wednesday.

Harold Koh, the State Department’s top legal adviser, outlined the administration’s legal case for the robotic attacks last month. Now, some legal experts are taking turns to punch holes in Koh’s argument.

It’s part of an ongoing legal debate about the CIA and U.S. military’s lethal drone operations, which have escalated in recent months — and which have received some technological upgrades. Critics of the program, including the American Civil Liberties Union, have argued that the campaign amounts to a program of targeted killing that may violate the laws of war.

In a hearing Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s national security and foreign affairs panel, several professors of national security law seemed open to that argument. But there are still plenty of caveats, and the risks to U.S. drone operators are at this point theoretical: Unless a judge in, say, Pakistan, wanted to issue a warrant, it doesn’t seem likely. But that’s just one of the possible legal hazards of robotic warfare.

Loyola Law School professor David Glazier, a former Navy surface warfare officer, said the pilots operating the drones from afar could — in theory — be hauled into court in the countries where the attacks occur. That’s because the CIA’s drone pilots aren’t combatants in a legal sense. “It is my opinion, as well as that of most other law-of-war scholars I know, that those who participate in hostilities without the combatant’s privilege do not violate the law of war by doing so, they simply gain no immunity from domestic laws,” he said.

“Under this view CIA drone pilots are liable to prosecution under the law of any jurisdiction where attacks occur for any injuries, deaths or property damage they cause,” Glazier continued. “But under the legal theories adopted by our government in prosecuting Guantánamo detainees, these CIA officers as well as any higher-level government officials who have authorized or directed their attacks are committing war crimes.”

The drones themselves are a lawful tool of war; “In fact, the ability of the drones to engage in a higher level of precision and to discriminate more carefully between military and civilian targets than has existed in the past actually suggests that they’re preferable to many older weapons,” Glazier added. But employing CIA personnel to carry out those armed attacks, he concluded, “clearly fall outside the scope of permissible conduct and ought to be reconsidered, particularly as the United States seeks to prosecute members of its adversaries for generally similar conduct.”

Drone attacks haven’t just become the primary weapon in the American bid to wipe out Al Qaeda and affiliated terrorist networks. “Very frankly, it’s the only game in town in terms of confronting or trying to disrupt the al Qaeda leadership,” CIA director Leon Panetta said.

But that “embrace of the Predator program has occurred with remarkably little public discussion, given that it represents a radical new and geographically unbounded use of state-sanctioned lethal force,” The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer recently observed. Before 9/11, the American government regularly condemned Israel for taking out individual terrorists. “Seven years later, there is no longer any doubt that targeted killing has become official U.S. policy.”

The U.S. government has since defended the strikes as legitimate self-defense — without going into details about the operations. Kenneth Anderson, an American University law professor, said the government’s reluctance to talk about the missions — as well as its reliance on an intelligence agency to carry out military action — raises some serious questions.

In his prepared statement (.pdf), Anderson said Koh “nowhere mentions the CIA by name in his defense of drone operations. It is, of course, what is plainly intended when speaking of self-defense separate from armed conflict. One understands the hesitation of senior lawyers to name the CIA’s use of drones as lawful when the official position of the U.S. government, despite everything, is still not to confirm or deny the CIA’s operations.”

What’s more, Anderson argued, Congress has been reluctant to talk about the bigger policy issue: Why this is a CIA mission in the first place. “Why should the CIA, or any other civilian agency, ever use force (leaving aside conventional law enforcement)?” he said. “Even granting the existence of self-defense as a legal category, why ever have force used by anyone other than the uniformed military?”

Mary Ellen O’Connell, professor of law at the University of Notre Dame, was much more blunt in her statement. “Combat drones are battlefield weapons,” she told the panel. “They fire missiles or drop bombs capable of inflicting very serious damage. Drones are not lawful for use outside combat zones. Outside such zones, police are the proper law enforcement agents, and police are generally required to warn before using lethal force.”

“Restricting drones to the battlefield is the most important single rule governing their use, O’Connell continued. “Yet, the United States is failing to follow it more often than not.”

Not all of the law professors testifying today agreed. Syracuse University’s William Banks, for one, said that “the intelligence laws permit the president broad discretion to utilize the nation’s intelligence agencies to carry out national security operations, implicitly including targeted killing.” Current U.S. laws “supply adequate - albeit not well articulated or understood - legal authority for these drone strikes.”

But American laws may not be on the only ones applicable to drone strikes, critics contend. As Anderson argued, the United States may face legal challenges from what he called the “international-law community” – nongovernmental organizations, international bodies, U.N. agencies and others who view this as a program of targeted killing that falls outside the bounds of armed conflict.

Either way, this hearing will not end the controversy. As we’ve noted here before, the government has been less than forthcoming about who, exactly, authorizes drone strikes, how the targets are chosen and how many civilians may have been inadvertently killed.

– Nathan Hodge and Noah Shachtman

Photo: U.S. Department of Defense

See Also:

* Drone Attacks Are Legit Self-Defense, Says State Dept. Lawyer
* CIA Contemplated Human Hit Squads, Turned to Killer Drones
* Drone Wars: The Legal Debate Continues
* Spy Chips Guiding CIA Drone Strikes, Locals Say
* U.S. Military Joins CIA’s Drone War in Pakistan
* Up to 320 Civilians Killed in Pakistan Drone War: Report


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/04/drone-pilots-could-be-tried...

Views: 37

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Sweettina2 on April 29, 2010 at 10:22am
Thank you Tara, I totally agree, they should be tried.
Comment by Tara on April 29, 2010 at 10:17am
They should be tried as the war criminals that they are! You just can't indiscrimantely fire at a village and expect that there is no innocent people in the vicinity. Great post Sweetina, this is certainly some good news.

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

cheeki kea commented on Aaron's photo
Thumbnail

steiner-vaccine (1)

"Great educational leaders back in the day to had an understanding of what a soul was, and went out…"
18 minutes ago
Aaron posted a video

Lockdown Torture of the Elderly

Elderly people are being subjected to genocidal torture locked in care homes and not legally allowed to go out, or have a visit, be hugged by, or to hold the...
26 minutes ago
Aaron posted blog posts
33 minutes ago
cheeki kea favorited Aaron's photo
45 minutes ago
cheeki kea commented on Mr. Sizzle's photo
Thumbnail

A great analogy

"So that's their party policy, to end their violence if they win the election. I think anyone…"
1 hour ago
Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
2 hours ago
Larry Flinchpaugh commented on Mr. Sizzle's video
Thumbnail

Ben Shapiro Exposed - Dissecting His Anti-America First Speech at Stanford University

"I lost respect for Ben Shapiro when he complained about Trump firing the War Hawk, John Bolton."
2 hours ago
Larry Flinchpaugh commented on Mr. Sizzle's photo
Thumbnail

A great analogy

"There is violence occurring in nearly every major city in America and the police are being told by…"
2 hours ago
Larry Flinchpaugh posted blog posts
2 hours ago
Larry Flinchpaugh commented on Mr. Sizzle's video
Thumbnail

Bo Duke and his summary while fueling his RV

"Too bad more people don't understand what he is saying!"
3 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Phyllis Maka's blog post Jim Stone: this was not a broadcast glitch, Pelosi actually glitched like that in real life. WTH is going on???
3 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited MAC's discussion BIOWARFARE: Chinese communists “intentionally” unleashed “Frankenstein” COVID-19, says Wuhan scientist.
4 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer posted a photo
4 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer posted videos
5 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Mr. Sizzle's video
Thumbnail

Bo Duke and his summary while fueling his RV

"nawwww... ol Bo aint on meth.....cheez-n-crackers this dudes aged rather shittily... WoW"
5 hours ago
Old Denmark posted a video

Two police officers shot in Louisville amid protests over Breonna Taylor ruling

Two police officers were shot and wounded late on Wednesday in Louisville, Kentucky, during protests of a grand jury ruling decried by civil rights activists...
5 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Mr. Sizzle's photo
Thumbnail

A great analogy

"What are they on? Illusions can be fatal when you come face to face with the reality."
7 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a blog post

Gary Barnett: Freedom Starts by Not Wearing a Mask

September 22, 2020"As bad as the ruling and political class's totalitarian response to this…See More
9 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle posted a photo
11 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle posted videos
11 hours ago

© 2020   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted