By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD.
January 27, 2012

While the States were considering ratifying the Constitution, James Madison describes a prophetic ‘gathering storm’, doomsday scenario for the United States. However, his description was hypothetical and purportedly unlikely.[1] Madison paints a picture of what the union would look like under healthy conditions and then contrasts that with terminal conditions that would destroy the union. His portrayal is fascinating and worth applying today.

In Federalist Paper 46, Madison discusses the happy and healthy situation where the Federal and State governments respect their constitutional boundaries. Madison says, “[the federal government will] be disinclined to invade the rights of the individual States, or the prerogatives of their governments”. Congress would be the “guardians of a common interest” and would not make “improper sacrifices…of local considerations, to the aggrandizement of the federal government”.

Madison continues, “the motives on the part of the States governments, to augment their prerogatives…will be overruled by no reciprocal predispositions in the members [of Congress].” In other words, the States will not want to intrude into federal authority because the Federal government will not intrude in State territory. In this “constitutional ideal”, Madison sees everyone respecting the authority of the other.

Madison then shifts his discussion to the hypothetical “what if”. He says, “[w]ere it admitted, however, that the Federal government may feel an equal disposition with the State governments to extend its power beyond the due limits, the [States] would still have the advantage in the means of defeating such encroachments” (emphasis added). Such means of defeating the federal government’s encroachments included actions like, “opposition”, “refusal to cooperate”, “frowns of the [State] executive”, “obstructions”, “signals of general alarm”, and “plans of resistance”.

Keep in mind, Madison’s description of “resistance” was made in context of a healthy, working union where the constitution remained and the amiable bonds of union were intact. The result of such conflicts within Federalism would ultimately be resolved through diplomacy where the people’s weight determined the outcome.

Madison furthers his “what if” hypothetical by describing a federal government that pursued “ambitious encroachments”. Madison predicts such usurpations would result in the same response “as was produced by the dread of a foreign, yoke”—namely, independence from the usurping government. However, Madison cannot fathom such an event taking place; he says, “[b]ut what degree of madness could ever drive the federal government to such an extremity.” Madison feels such actions would be advanced by madmen, not fellow patriots.

Still, Madison answers his own question (for the sake of appeasing his audience) when he describes the (implausible) circumstances ripe for this tyranny. Madison says, the “only refuge left for those who prophesy the downfall of the State governments is the visionary supposition that the federal government may previously accumulate a military force for the projects of ambition…it [is not] necessary now to disprove the reality of this danger” (emphasis added).

Madison finds it unimaginable that the federal government could and would accumulate a military force capable and for the purpose of subduing the people and States. Madison bases his conclusion on these presumptions:

“(1) the people and the States [will not] elect…men ready to betray both; (2) [there will be no] traitors…[to] uniformly and systematically pursue some fixed plan for the extension of the military establishment; (3) the governments and the people of the States [will not silently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and continue to supply the materials, until it should be prepared to burst on their own heads…(4) [and further] the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger [through militias]” (emphasis and numbers added).

So here we are in 2011. Our world is not James Madison’s world. Are Madison’s presumptions correct today? Is the U.S. military incapable of subduing the States? Do the people elect only patriots, and not traitors? Do the States have the capability of successfully protecting themselves against opposing military? Are the people capable of forecasting a gathering storm?

Reasonable persons would conclude, the U.S. military is more than capable of subduing the States; the people do elect traitors to office; and the States have no adequate means of defending themselves against opposing military force—from whatever source. (If someone has evidence to the contrary, let us see it.)

Now that the National Defense Authorization Act is law (see my previous articles on NDAA, here and here), Madison’s “gathering storm” scenario is more real than ever. So, how are the States to protect themselves from enemies domestic and foreign (as they have a constitutional duty to do—see, Art. 1, Sec. 3)? Is this an inappropriate question? If so, let us see the reason.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

It is a proven maxim that States have the duty and right to protect and sustain themselves. It is also a maxim that every government owes to its citizens protection (e.g. 49-1-201, Mont. Code Ann., “Every person while within the jurisdiction of this state is entitled to its protection”; Art. 1, Sec., USC). In spite of the Second Amendment’s prescription that the States maintain a well-regulated militia to secure a “Free State” and the State constitutions and laws requiring State militias to protect the State’s homeland, there is not one State that is capable of protecting the citizens from domestic or foreign invasion.

Will the “gathering storm” result in an actual storm? God knows, and time will tell; but unless the people have the discretion and discernment to “behold the gathering storm”, it is unlikely the people will do anything about it until the storm of hail is smashing people’s heads in.

© 2012 Timothy N. Baldwin, JD - All Rights Reserved


1. Madison would have shocked the States if the opposite were plausible

More here: http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin182.htm

Views: 52


You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"


mobile page


12160 Administrators



Latest Activity

Raz Putin commented on Phyllis Maka's blog post EU is Out. UK Brexit 31st Oct 2019. Marie Le Penn for France. Matteo Salvini for Italy. Trump for America. Obrador for Mexico.... 'donkeys' for NZ
"Lines are drawn globally speaking. Kashmir conflict Pakistan v India Hong Kong (USA) v China USA…"
12 minutes ago
Raz Putin favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post EU is Out. UK Brexit 31st Oct 2019. Marie Le Penn for France. Matteo Salvini for Italy. Trump for America. Obrador for Mexico.... 'donkeys' for NZ
28 minutes ago
the mighty bull posted videos
1 hour ago
Mrs. Tif Morgan replied to Mrs. Tif Morgan's discussion Federal Judge Who Oversaw Release Of Jeffrey Epstein’s Sealed Records Was Found Dead
" Yep, know when he died, its kind of strange that so many involved in exposing the sex…"
1 hour ago
James Roberts posted photos
1 hour ago
Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
1 hour ago
Citizen Quasar commented on Boris's page video - @MrAndyNgo : Today's Portland antifa vs. right-wing protests have the potential to be a powder keg.
"I think the best way to handle this ANTIFA scum is to shoot them dead in America's streets.…"
3 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Phyllis Maka's blog post THE MIRACLE OF LIFE EXTENSION TECH WAS BURIED - Jim Stone
"When you work out on empty stomach in the morning, HGH production in the body increases by 400%"
3 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Boris's video
3 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Boris's video

Watch live: Far-right, extremist groups clash in Portland, Oregon

"Yeah, the title is something. Sounds like there should be no comma. Reminds me of a newspaper…"
3 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Localtarian's video
3 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Jeff's video

Alison Weir

"Link is missing."
3 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Diana's video
3 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Diana's video

Dr. Cyril Wecht: 'Have Not Seen' Multiple Fractures in "Lean Into" Hanging Suicide

"I liked the coroner Fox news brought on. He said we "have to accept" the cause of death…"
3 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Central Scrutinizer's video

Now They Want You to Accept Literal Vampirism, Too

"She's right that we have seen nothing yet. They're not real vampires. Real vampires drink…"
4 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Central Scrutinizer's video
4 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted