Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

US Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth

By: Ron Baitley-Simens

on 5th March 2014 @ 7.15pm

Share on facebook Share on tumblr Share on email More Sharing Services 452

http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-t...

A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.

John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:

‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.

‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun 'telescoping' when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.

‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would havemaintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.

‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.

The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph. It would have crumpled.
No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.

‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.

The affidavit, dated 28^th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.

In March 2007, Reynolds, a former chief economist under the George W Bush administration filed a Request For Correction with the US National Institute of Science and Technology citing his belief that real commercial jets (Boeings) did not hit the WTC towers.

Although the 9/11 Truth movement initially rejected the ‘no-planes’ theory as too outlandish, after scientific and rational analysis, it has become a widely accepted explanation of the evidence collected.

Unlike any other form of statement, an affidavit becomes truth in law, if it is not rebutted. It will now be up to critics of the theory to present their evidence and analysis to rebut the statement point by point. If they do not – or cannot – then the US government will be obliged to admit that the account given by the 9/11 Commission is wrong.

The 65 year old retired airline captain and former CIA pilot – who has over 19,000 hours of flight time -- also drew attention to the inexperience of the pilots who allegedly flew the planes:

‘The alleged 'controlled' descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of 'controlled' flight.

‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the "EFIS" (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.

http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-t...

Favorite

6 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 1:39am: Al Qaeda had absolutely nothing to do with 911. All the networks were networked, but there is a 17 sec delay in all live footage. The substitude came fro moving the camera focus. It was almost amateurist. In out pan in out pan out. Different light levels for the same shot. Static background fro helicopter shots, and the list goes on.

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 15, 2014 at 1:29am: "Nose out" -> "Al Qaeda" (or what name to use) had planned how to present 911 using FOX

"How FOX was feeding CNN and the International News, like RTL, as showed in one of the International versions of "Inside the Twin Towers"."

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 1:15am: The nose out was only shown once on TV. All the other pix were edited. That was the first clue.

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 15, 2014 at 1:11am: "Nose out" proves a lot (but mostly we will not see what is in plain sight)

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 1:03am: That is absolutely impossible

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 1:01am

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 15, 2014 at 12:45am: nose out

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 15, 2014 at 12:03am: i used to think it was a missile on the second...but no longer

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 11:55pm: And it was a missile on the first. Stick around, I have some pix to post tonight.

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 14, 2014 at 11:52pm: "it was a bomb in the second building. Who said it was a plane?"

"i did not see plane go in, that just exploded"

"it goes against what everybody believes, but i guess that's the power of the media"

"it's like the towers were made from glass, but in reality that's not true"

"some kind of illusion, some kind of video fakery"