The world is governed by people far different from those imagined by the public.
Benjamin Disraeli, Victorian-era Prime Minister of Britain.

In JFK's landmark speech [1] in New York to the journalists of America, that America was under attack from ‘secret societies’ and from the subversion of truth, Kennedy pointed out; “...the secret societies in America had gained control over a vast material, political, economic, human and natural resources and that no expenditure was questioned or denied." 

He said; "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."[2]  

This speech was made in 1961, and almost half a century has since passed, though to date, no other world leader has dared come forward and try to expose these malicious kinds of groups, - so one can only imagine how much stronger, resilient and advanced these ‘secret societies’ the Masonic/Illuminati cabals etc., have gained control and dominance in the worlds political arenas, our countries economies, us as humans, - and of course the vast natural resources that no expenditure is ever questioned or denied.

As a Catholic, Kennedy was determined to root out the mainly white Anglo-Saxon Protestant conspiracies that were so pervasive in America, as have been in the UK since the 16th century, and the contributing factor of the all ‘the troubles’ in Northern Ireland with the support of the ‘Orange men’.

And those holders of the Royal Arch Purple,[3] an ―higher degree of initiation within the Grand Orange Lodge of Ireland and takes its Royal title from the Biblical Kings and also the time when the fifth son of King George III [also the King of the Black [Royal-Black] Nobility House of Hanover] was Grand Master of the Orange Order in England.Royal Black Institution parading in Lisburn, Northern Ireland, in August 2007.

In 2001, ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has since converted to Catholicism in December 2007, promised to re-examine legislation that bans Catholic‘s from becoming a King, Queen or simply marrying a monarch of the UK, but did nothing about it, or should I say, could NOT do anything about it.In 2008, Jack Straw, the then Justice Secretary, signaled that ministers would look at abolishing the then 308-year-old Act of [4] Settlement because it is antiquated, and discriminates against a section of society.

As mentioned, under the 1701 Act, English monarchs are forbidden to become Catholic, or to marry one. Traditionally governments have steered clear of the issue, because of the implications for the Church of England and the complexity of the law, - in 2011 and at the time of writing, this now 311 year old Act still stands.

Since then, there has been a change to permit a Monarch to 'Marry' a Catholic, though they still cannot become Monarch.

So this discrimination against a section of society continues to be the case, and speaks volumes to any other religions in the world, and just seems to be a real hatred towards Catholics in general. 

William III, Prince of Orange

What‘s extremely interesting in the 1991 film; JFK- The story that won‘t go away, is the scene where Donald Sutherland, whom plays X, meets Kevin Costner who plays the District Attorney Jim Garrison, covertly meet at the Lincoln memorial.  X is a high ranking Colonel and whom in circumstances of National Security such as JFK‘s visit to Dallas, X would have been accompanied by a team of at least 30 CIA officers, whose job and sole task was to scrutinise the area for weak and hot spots that could cause detrimental to the president‘s visit.  Open spaces and over looking windows and roof areas for instance would have had extra attention to detail paid to them, if X and his men were called in as they routinely would have been in advance of JFK‘s visit and entourage. 

However, oddly and conveniently enough, and just prior to the JFK Dallas visit, X was called into the office‘s of his superior‘s and was told he was being sent on an off the cuff mission to Antarctica, [this happened on 9/11 to other certain key members of the military on 9/11 2001, though were sent to Arctic instead], it was a way of getting X out of the way, so the dark forces could work unhindered and get on with arranging the assassination.

Donald Sutherland tells Kevin Costner's character some shocking facts and unanswered questions.

But, what is fascinating to hear and see is the conversation between X and Garrison whilst sitting on the park bench where they finally settle for their tête-à-tête, and cleverly devised by Stone; and without any actual mention within the script of the word 'Freemason/s', he deliberately pans in and out of the close-up shots of Sutherland and Costner showing at first the White House, then as the discussion between them goes on and X starts to explain the billions of pounds being made by a select few out of the funding or wars in general, he then goes on to say; You‘ve become a significant threat to the national security structure. They would have killed you already but you got a lot of light on you. Instead they‘re‘ trying to destroy your credibility. They already have in many circles in this town [1].

The reference to 'they', is of course the 'Establishment' = the Freemasons/Illuminati cabals, that even Stone and Zachary Sklar who co-wrote the screenplay version of this film, does not actually accuse the Freemasons directly, it appears they understand how powerful they really are. 

No, they‘re too cute to actually point the finger, or use the words Illuminati/Freemasons within the dialogue of the script, [that whilst in the making of JFK, Stone allegedly received death threats, as he recalled in an interview; I can‘t even remember all the threats, there were so many of them], instead they leave it to the viewer to pick-up on the subtle and subliminal flashes of reference to the 'them' and 'they' said by X, on certain and key words.

Stone directly shows behind the two men, the base of the huge obelisk, [that Masonic Landmark - the Washington Monument], then pans to its centre, then moves the camera three quarters up, when finally accumulating to the entire obelisk being shown in full view...

When X refers to and say‘s; Well they've been doing it all through history. Kings are killed, Mr. Garrison, politics is power, nothing more! Oh, don‘t take my word for it, don‘t believe me. Do your own work, your own thinking. Garrison intervenes and says; ―I never realised Kennedy was so dangerous to the establishment. [2] Is that why? And X replies; Well that‘s the real question, isn‘t it -Why? The how and the-who, is just scenery for the public. Oswald, Ruby, Cuba, the Mafia, keeps em guessing like some kind of parlour game, prevents em from asking the most important question,- why? Why was Kennedy killed, who benefited, who has the power to cover it up, - who? [3]

Also in the film and in response to Bill Brousard, a once member of Garrison‘s legal team, who criticised Garrison for his 'off the wall' assumptions that certain members of the 'establishment' were responsible for the staging of the JFK assassination, and the many unanswered questions as to what might have really happened on 9/11 in 2001, seems to also fit his line of questioning, as Garrison goes onto say: Could the Mob change the parade route, Bill, or eliminate the protection for the President? Could the Mob send Oswald to Russia and get him back? Could the Mob get the FBI the CIA, and the Dallas Police to make a mess of the investigation? Could the Mob appoint the Warren Commission to cover it up? Could the Mob wreck the autopsy? Could the Mob influence the national media to go to sleep? And since when has the Mob used anything but .38‘s for hits, up close. The Mob wouldn‘t have the guts or the power for something of this magnitude. Assassins need payrolls, orders, times, schedules. This was a military-style ambush from start to finish... a coup d‘état with Lyndon Johnson waiting in the wings.[3]

Murder in Dealy Plaza: What We Know Now That We Didn‘t Know Then About the Death of JFK by James Fetzer published 2000. - Fetzer claims to be the Donald Sutherland insider X character in the Oliver Stone movie JFK. He explains why the Warren Commission findings could ‗not possibly be true‘. This story has special relevance today, because he states George Bush Snr, was at a crucial place to have prevented, or aided the assassination of JFK [4].

Free the JFK Files

Petitioning Office of Information Policy and Regulatory Affairs

Sign the Petition Here

[1] a href="http://www.truth-it.net/secret_society_and_subversive_movement.html%3E">http://www.truth-it.net/secret_society_and_subversive_movement.html...;.

[2] "YouTube - "The War on Internet Censorship" w/ Alex Jones ..." a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFVW_lCDztE%3E">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFVW_lCDztE>;.

[3] "Royal Arch Purple a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Arch_Purple%3E">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Arch_Purple>;.

[4] a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/3076884/Catholic-could-become-king-under-plans-to-abolish-Act-of-Settlement.html%3E">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/3076884/Catho...;.

------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] "who do you think shot jfk? a href="http://www.volnation.com/forum/politics/15317-who-do-you-think-shot-jfk-3.html%3E">http://www.volnation.com/forum/politics/15317-who-do-you-think-shot...;.

[2] "The Sharp Side: JFK' and JFK and Vietnam." a href="http://ellissharp.blogspot.com/2007/10/jfk-and-jfk-and-vietnam.html%3E">http://ellissharp.blogspot.com/2007/10/jfk-and-jfk-and-vietnam.html...;.

[3] "JFK - Oliver Stone a href="http://metalasylum.com/ragingbull/movies/jfk.html%3E">http://metalasylum.com/ragingbull/movies/jfk.html>;.

[4] "Books Vaguely Related to George W. Bush." a href="http://mindprod.com/politics/bushbooksrelated.html%3E">http://mindprod.com/politics/bushbooksrelated.html>;.