Andy McCabe, the fired former FBI Director is on a book tour. He was interviewed by 60 Minutes recently giving the reasons for his rationale over ordering the illegal electronic surveillance of newly elected Donald Trump in what amounts to an attempted coup. McCabe explains during the interview why he thought it was necessary to investigate the Trump campaign under the aegis of a Russian collusion probe. Basically, as he explained, minus all the dancing around rationalization over doing his duty, he fails to somehow take responsibility for a crime he admits that he committed.
The DNC and Hillary Clinton funded opposition research used to justify a FISA Court request for surveillance using a salacious and unverified Steele Dossier, as described by James Comey that was signed off on by Department of Justice Head, Rod Rosenstein, twice. The law taken into the hands of rogue FBI agents, Peter Strzok, FBI Atty. Lisa Page, and Bruce Orr, who didn’t like the fact that Donald Trump had been elected and so took it upon themselves to contradict the decision made by 64 million US voters and try to prevent a legally elected president from taking office. While under the deceptive umbrella of a Russian collusion probe ignoring 33,000 emails of evidence proving Hillary Clinton had violated classified protocol and the Espionage Act, both Podesta Brothers who while holding US public office were doing billions of dollars with the Russians without even declaring foreign agent status, their criminality was simply ignored.
What constitutes high crime?
So, let us define treason. Aiding and abetting the enemy, is one clause. Using devices not cleared for any other use than for federal government property containing US Classified material that would be of interest to America’s enemies. Using those unapproved communication devices while within the borders of nations considered hostile to the United States, and even having a personal server secretly located in their residence being hacked by enemy agents as a result of not being under the purview of federal government security and law. These are legal offenses committed by not only Democrat candidate and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, her staff, and legal counsel.
Subverted from within
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former DNC Chair, having in her employ two Pakistani brothers Imran Awan being one of them, who were making hundreds of thousands while they illegally violated classified statutes opening sensitive files of US Federal Government State Department property, had access to computers that they regularly scanned for classified files they copied and carried home, and then made trips back to Pakistan with. After a decade of being under the employ of the Democrat Party were supposedly terminated yet retained by Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Debbie threatened DC police for recovering a laptop full of illegally obtained federal classified material knew she could be incriminated for due to the contents that had been illegally obtained. Regardless of negligence. This would be grounds for traitorous conduct!
All of these unholy alliances of illegal conduct carried on by the Democrat Party refusing to investigate its own perpetrators. Taking into their hands the law and attempting to not only blame a newly elected presidential candidate but attempting to falsely accuse him of the very offenses they themselves are committing? This is why Democrats should never be in charge, but more importantly how an internal coup nearly succeeded and would have had Hillary Clinton been elected as under her office none of this law breaking would ever have been investigated much less prosecuted! Our own FBI shamelessly politicized to the benefit of America’s enemies. Our very own State Department colluding with the Russians over the acquisition of 20% of US Uranium with Hillary still in office at the State Department. Is this not treason?
More than botching an investigation
Former FBI Director, James Comey, allowing Hillary’s staff and legal counsel to destroy their I-Phones, Laptops, and any other personal devices that would have contained illegally obtained classified documents while declaring that he could not find intent in the actions of the former Secretary of State? Is not the destruction of evidence a crime? In view of the fact that Comey refused to prosecute Clinton with a plethora of evidence of crimes she had committed while making drafts of a letter to exonerate Hillary weeks in advance of even interviewing the former Secretary of State? Is this not treason?
Defining legal guilt
Yet, the US media clearly will cast the deciding verdict in all this. Not the Department of Justice, not the Circuit Courts, or even the Supreme Court Justices, we have a press corps circus that is now helping to promote Andrew McCabe’s new book, a man who was fired for breaking the law and conspiring to remove a duly elected president from office with falsified evidence! According to the law when a conspiracy is being prosecuted in a court of law, the prosecution is not required by law to prove the offenses of each individual conspirator, but proof of the conspiracy to commit the crime in question is sufficient evidence to prove guilt!
When prosecution fails the test
Just as in the witch hunt that has been underway against President Trump which has turned up absolutely nothing but the persecution of those around him. One might recall the anguish of so many prosecutors over the years when investigating drug dealers and obtaining warrants for search and seizure while clearly defining what evidence is being sought and what the charges pertain to that evidence only and not collateral evidence not named in the warrants many acquittals resulted in illegally obtained evidence. According to the proper function of a legal investigation, search for evidence, and a defined scope of inquiry those who may be guilty of unrelated charges outside of the case that is under current investigation may not be charged for unspecified evidence not pertaining to the specific charges!
Web of lies
Paul Mantafort charged for violations having nothing to do with Russian Collusion was merely the Gestapo tactics of the Mueller probe in an attempt to get him to testify against President Trump which would have amounted to perjury. General Flynn, an accomplished patriot and whistleblower who alerted the world to the sanitizing of ISIS intelligence to make it appear that President Obama was unaware of a growing threat, only sealed his fate for a vengeance loaded prosecution of charges unrelated to Russian Collusion or any possible testimony against the President. Special Council Mueller qualifies for the prestigious claim to treason when one puts his witch hunt into proper perspective and that was to deflect the attention of the public from what the criminal conduct within the FBI, DOJ, the DNC, and the Democrat electoral campaign had been guilty of all along while attempting to incriminate our sitting president!
How have great empires and prolific nations fallen when never could they have been beaten by their adversaries? They were subverted from within. The “Big Lie” that Joseph Goebbels spoke of as Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda. “Repeat the lie over and over again until it becomes the truth,” he declared in his admission of just how one of the most successful tactics of disinformation worked. It is here that we find the historic reference that quite succinctly clarifies the classic Democrat Party modus operandi. The US media with few exceptions has allowed the Democrats to evade the cost of their criminality and has served as the mouthpiece for their sanctioned political subterfuge. With all the abundance within the country we call America, truth has become a rare commodity while being the casualty of propaganda used by those we thought to be our very own countrymen. In the words of Yuri Bezmenov, the “Useful Idiots” of the very revolution they will be liquidated over.
Let us also be reminded in all this. In texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page they mentioned that the President (Obama) had advised them to keep him informed. Yet, another conspirator!