Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by truth on August 22, 2013 at 5:09pm

Via Google Translate:

INFO LE FIGARO - According to our information, the regime's opponents, supervised by Jordanian, Israeli and American commandos moving towards Damascus since mid-August. This attack could explain the possible use of the Syrian president to chemical weapons.


While it is too early to rule out categorically the argument put forward by Damascus and Moscow, who blame the massacre on the Syrian opposition, it is already possible to provide answers to a troubling question. What benefit would have Assad to launch an unconventional attack at the precise moment when he had to allow UN inspectors - after being stranded for several months - to investigate the use of chemical weapons?

Operational logic first. According to information obtained by Le Figaro , the first trained in guerrilla warfare by the Americans in Jordan Syrian troops reportedly entered into action since mid-August in southern Syria, in the region of Deraa. A first group of 300 men, probably supported by Israeli and Jordanian commandos, as well as men of the CIA, had crossed the border on August 17. A second would have joined the 19. According to military sources, the Americans, who do not want to put troops on the Syrian soil or arming rebels in part controlled by radical Islamists form quietly for several months in a training camp set up at the border Jordanian- Syrian fighters ASL, the Free Syrian Army, handpicked.

Sense of impunity

As for the summer, their protection have begun to shake Syrian battalions in the south, approaching the capital. "Their thrust would now feel into the Ghouta, where formations of ASL were already at work, but really can make a difference on the outskirts of Damascus fortress," says David Rigoulet-Roze, a researcher at the French Institute for Strategic Analysis (IFAS).

According to this expert on the region, the idea proposed by Washington would be the possible establishment of a buffer zone from the south of Syria, or even a no-fly zone, which would cause opponents safely until the balance of power changes. This is the reason why the United States has deployed Patriot batteries and F16 in late June Jordan.
The recent pressure against military threat Ghouta the capital Damascus, the heart of the Syrian regime. In July, the spokesman of President al-Assad had publicly stated that the scheme would not use chemical weapons in Syria "except in case of external aggression." The intrusion of foreign agents in the south, for example ...
The other reason, if the army has actually committed a massacre in Damascus chemical is more diplomatic. Since August, 2012, when Barack Obama warned that the use of chemical weapons was a "red line" that, once crossed, could trigger a military intervention, thirteen smaller chemical attack have been identified without causing American reaction. Admittedly, the evidence is difficult to obtain, since Damascus routinely blocks the work of UN investigators. The sense of impunity felt by the Syrian regime is reinforced by the Russian protection afforded to the Security Council of the UN. Barack Obama, when he arrived at the White House, the Kremlin had proposed a "reset" of relations, not to break the link with Moscow. U.S. Chief of Staff, Martin Dempsey, the principal military adviser, justifies his opposition to intervention, even limited by the fragmentation of the Syrian opposition and the weight exerted by extremist groups.
Civilians affected by the fumes of toxic agents during the attack Ghouta, waiting for first aid at a makeshift medical center in Saqba, a suburb of Damascus on Wednesday.
What are the options?

If the Syrian regime is actually behind the chemical bombardment of Damascus, it will take a further degree is a conflict that has claimed more than 100,000 lives. "There is more of a small-scale test as before. Chemical weapons are now part of the war, where they play a deterrent role. This is a message to the Americans. It is also a challenge to Barack Obama, who risks losing its legitimacy with its allies in the world, "an expert analysis of the case.
Along with clandestine operations from Jordanian soil, the international community, as each time the crisis is reaching a peak, reconsider the various military options. Arming the rebels? "If we do one day we will not say," said a diplomatic source. Surgical air strikes? Possible, but the solution involves risk regionalization of the conflict. Special forces to secure and neutralize chemical weapons sites? Israel hit neighboring Syria repeatedly. But Western intelligence services did not want to risk that stocks of chemical weapons falling into the hands of jihadist groups. Last option, inaction. It is that which seems to have bet on Bashar al-Assad in Damascus.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rick White on August 22, 2013 at 5:55pm

The new world order globalist are putting there 3rd world war plans in as we can see. This has been there plan for the last 60 years.They planed the 1st and the 2nd world wars and now the 3rd. Check out END GAME by alex jones on youtube.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alan on August 24, 2013 at 4:53am

False flag not doubt

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 1e3o0fhd65yld on August 23, 2013 at 11:22am

The U.S. is already bankrupt, living on foreign loans and Monopoly money. All Putin has to do is sit back and watch the fools in Washington stumble right into the bear trap. And they're still trying to figure out a way to strike Iran, but they're waiting for Israel to green light the operation. Iran is the golden egg.

The Middle East and central Asia are about to go up in flames. Get ready for the next global war. The wheels are in motion, and there's no stopping it now. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by jim on August 22, 2013 at 5:39pm

This depending on Putin could get ugly very fast he's already pissed off and this just may be his trigger.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Edward Kendrick on August 22, 2013 at 6:53pm

What if the reports that it is Assad using chemical weapons are false--that the real perpetrators are operating for the benefit of the zionist entity?

We've been lied to before.  It seems the tactic of war by way of deception is still working.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pam Prince on August 23, 2013 at 1:36am

Same thought entered my mind. After 9211 .. Nothing surprises...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Timothy Lee Antony Michel on August 22, 2013 at 10:21pm

Even if this wasn't a false flag, which I think it is, again I must say, it's none of our business. We need to return to the original ideas of the founders. NO FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS. Anyone in govt against that, needs to be removed. By force if they push us to it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jenny Goddard on August 23, 2013 at 3:06am

Well the US, France and GB have all been keen to go in and take Syria down.

It is so awful to see these once beautiful countries being destroyed one by one, to be taken over by the West.

Same old lies as well WMD, always done by THE  pointing finger rather than the rightful owners of that country.

Why do we all stand for it, do we want one massive war to engulf us all, lead by maniacs and psychopaths? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by cherry nelson on August 23, 2013 at 11:09pm

Cowards! What they are doing is keeping the Arabs fighting & killing each other so they don't have to fight & die. The world should think that these tribes cannot live in peace with each other while along along, for generations, America and Israel has been destablizing the region to feed their greed. Where are the tons of gold Khadafi had stored up ready to change the currency? This is why they killed him; he would demand gold as payment for oil; of course America has none , so they had to kill him and ---where is the gold ?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by cherry nelson on August 24, 2013 at 3:56pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=WhkoO...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by scotty michele brown on August 24, 2013 at 12:15pm

My insides are filled with dread. I know it's going to happen again. The US will send in the bombers under NATO blessing and cover. Many innocent people, including babies, will be shredded by bombs. Are people really that stupid, to keep believing those false flags?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page