Comment

Comment by Marklar on January 26, 2011 at 1:29pm

We have a similar though somewhat less irksome problem as he has with his "nuclear" material. The chemical we mix with our water for improved conductivity is obtainable as an over the counter medication in a purity that is usable in our process, but to obtain the pure chemical (which would work even better of course) requires a pharmacist's license.

Comment by Marklar on January 26, 2011 at 1:23pm

Cool. An old boss of mine has a company that has developed an organic molecule that binds with hydrogen for later release that they developed for shipping hydrogen without the usual subzero refrigeration normally required for shipping liquid hydrogen. I wonder if that would be a decent substitute for his banned material. The question would be whether the the organic material is able to bind with and release hydrogen over and over without breaking down into a waste product that must be replaced.

 

Then he can not only sell his car conversions - he can lease my quadratic electrolysis technology to keep from having to replace the platinum elements in his hydrogen production device. Yes, even platinum eventually corrodes during electrolysis. It's likely that replacing his platinum electrolysis elements again and again is the major ongoing maintenance cost in this system after the initial investment.

 

Contrary to the subtext under this video there are fuel cells involved here, they are just kept outside of the vehicle itself. The fuel cell is the electrolysis device he showed in the video.

Comment by truth on January 26, 2011 at 12:01pm

who killed the electric car http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1405611374523233913&hl=...