8 Moon-Landing Hoax Myths–Busted

An astronaut on the moon with an American flag.

Views: 2153

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Freedomrox on August 9, 2012 at 6:47pm

I don't care for anything that has Phil Plait attached to it. Disinfo agent extraordinaire. To leave footprints require moisture, and with no atmosphere, then moisture should not even be present. 

Since there are so many man made Van Allen Belts in addition to the actual Van Allen's, (see Project: Starfish), I find it beyond all belief that even a minute dosage would overpower and of their so called shielding in a tin can. Remember that any small solar event in near Earth orbit has caused and will always cause concerns for orbiting satellites and the ISS, and the shielding of these are the most modern of our times.

Micro-meteroids are 350 times more prevalent outside the confines of Earth's gravity well, so I guess the tin can withstood all the impacts and the Van Allen radiation Belts that nearly every Physicist and JPL admit that they cannot do today!

I call shenanigans!

Comment by Exposure on August 9, 2012 at 5:37pm

Yes, I sure have.  It reminds me of that ludicrous article in Popular Mechanics, titled: “Debunking 9/11 Myths”.  I’m more concerned for those who believe the “official” storylines to both these great lies; - as are those who obviously feel the need to have to keep churning out so called “debunked” article/s every now and again.  The arguments for NASA’s Apollo going to the moon can sound convincing, because like the JFK assassination, and what happened on 9/11, the established government and media both cooperate in altering the facts.  These bastardised facts - the moon rocks, the astronaut’s combined testimony etc. and the NIST reports etc. form the foundation of the Apollo Believer’s and 9/11 official storyline of evidence, and when filtered through the accepting media and scientific community - it all sounds plausible.  Sorry kid, but you can’t pull the wool over my eyes that easily.  Why would you even want to blog such an article of so called debunked list of questions? 

Look at this list of ‘debunking answers’, the same questions can be found in your blog, yet the answers are different, - it’s as if they are clutching at straws trying to convince “us”, they went to the moon in a craft that my desk calculator has more technology. 

Why are no stars visible in the Apollo photos?

The Apollo landings took place during lunar mornings so the stars were not bright enough to be captured on camera.

Who filmed Neil Armstrong take the first steps?

A video camera was fixed on an extending arm to swing out and capture the historic moment.

Why did the heavy Landing Modules make no impression on the surface, while the astronauts' footprints did?

The layer of lunar dust on the rocky moon is thin, so was blown away from the landing area by the descent engines. This dust resettled by the time the astronauts left the module.

Why does the flag wave?

It was rigged with a rod and wires so that it would look as if it was unfurled and blowing in Apollo photographs.

Why didn't the Lunar module show a flame when it took off from the Moon?
The fuel used does not produce a flame in a vacuum.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2034594/NASA-moon-la...

Do you believe everything you are told, or do you question reality - the things you are taught at university or the events discussed on television by the newsreaders? You should question them. We are entering a new age of all out war against free humanity, engineered by those who pose to be our saviours.

Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE

Comment by Robert Carobene on August 9, 2012 at 1:41pm

Have you clicked on the link?

Comment by Exposure on August 9, 2012 at 1:09pm

Debunked?  Have I missed somthing here?  Not only single answer debunks anything whatsover!

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

MAC posted a video
1 hour ago
FREEDOMROX favorited MAC's discussion Climate Engineering: Tennessee Senate Is First To Pass Bill To Ban Geoengineering
6 hours ago
FREEDOMROX replied to MAC's discussion Climate Engineering: Tennessee Senate Is First To Pass Bill To Ban Geoengineering
"Two weeks ago, West Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma and all points South were used as a Staging…"
6 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on tjdavis's photo
11 hours ago
cheeki kea posted a photo
11 hours ago
cheeki kea posted a blog post
12 hours ago
Less Prone commented on MAC's photo
Thumbnail

gvIKn.qR4e-small-MAJOR-MEAT-COMPANY-INVESTS

"What, in the late years of their lives, is driving these people to commit such evil crimes against…"
yesterday
Less Prone commented on cheeki kea's blog post Covid vaccine death: “I didn’t know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically, so quickly” - coder speaks out.
"The sad state of the modern medicine"
yesterday
cheeki kea's 2 blog posts were featured
yesterday
Doc Vega's 4 blog posts were featured
yesterday
Anti Everything's 2 blog posts were featured
yesterday
CattyScatbrat's blog post was featured
yesterday
Burbia's blog post was featured

Journalism as we know it

By Burbia The direction of journalism has taken is odious. First we have yellow journalism. This…See More
yesterday
Less Prone commented on tjdavis's photo
yesterday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
tjdavis posted photos
yesterday
tjdavis posted a video

GHOSTS IN THE MACHINE: PSYWAR

The World Is Our Stage...Join Us. Text SORB04 to 462-769 and Go PSYOP today!
yesterday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

A Point in History

A Point in History I'm up at this hour just give me a breakI want to quit but there’s too much at…See More
Thursday
tjdavis posted videos
Thursday
Doc Vega posted photos
Wednesday

© 2024   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted