Comment

Comment by Nathan A. Bauer on September 11, 2012 at 4:06am

http://letsrollforums.com/original-design-twin-towers-t27324.html?s...;

Just for you Mick, but plenty of other design links that suggest the exact same principles.

Comment by Russ Hallberg Jr on September 11, 2012 at 3:58am

An exclusive interview with the photographer here: http://www.voltairenet.org/9-11-FEMA-videographer-at-Ground

Can't stop 9/11 truth!

Comment by mick on September 11, 2012 at 3:38am

got a link ?

Comment by Nathan A. Bauer on September 11, 2012 at 3:20am

Also, as an aside, almost every man pictured above, is now dead, by Sonnenfeld and the admission of the NYPD, and NYFD.

Comment by Nathan A. Bauer on September 11, 2012 at 3:17am

Actually the pre-sets were known of at the time, and were designed to bring the buildings down. These were steel boxes set at every point along the structural framework. It was determined in 1982 that these pre-sets were not sufficient to bring down any of the towers in a fashion configured for footprint demolition. 

This is why Taped charges were put on all key structural steel supports, known as radio controlled "Cutter Charges". 

Again, this was not enough, as it was determined that there was no way way to destroy the underground complex housing most of America's Gold, a feint, as it were,, since most thought it to be in the Federal Reserve, or Fort Knox. So, all gold was trucked out prior to the explosives, otherwise known as mini-nukes, that were clearly recorded just prior to the planes hitting and blew out all the windows of the lobby, as shown in the Naudet Brothers Video on 9/11. The blast were actually seven floors below the ground.

Btw, apeman, it was Building 7, not 6.

Comment by apeman2502 on September 11, 2012 at 2:51am

  Building 6 was set just before detonation. pwersonnel had been cleared out. Bush had just done a remanning of key positions in the U.S. Border Patrol with untrained FEMAtards.

Comment by apeman2502 on September 11, 2012 at 2:46am

  Doesn't anybody want to know about the presets installed during construction? You will have to man up and hit 1968-1972 magazine archives. Very scary. The potential of extreme personal danger. Your mothers might see what you really spend most of your time staring at on your computer after you leave the house to check out some journals and newspapers.

  Articles about Skilling Engineers being pissed  off about the preset and shoddy work are nonexistent. They WERE upset, and wondered why the shitty work was signed off as completed and approved. Glad to see the photo evidence of this preset. I have HAD IT with shit being thrown in my face. THANX SONNENFELD.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page