Can’t make this up: In 2018, Senate Democrats sent Ukrainian prosecutor a letter … asking him to investigate Trump

This is surreal. Did someone simply forget about this? Or is it OK that the senators did this – with, bonus, an implied threat to congressional support for U.S.-Ukraine relations (read: quid pro quo)? And if so, then it’s obviously OK for Trump to do it? (Perhaps the House Democrats didn’t get the memo?)

Alternatively: is it a high crime and/or misdemeanor that the senators did this, and it therefore means that the senators should be censured and expelled by their fellows from the Senate?

The letter is here:  https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/5-4-18%20Menendez%20jo...

The opening paragraph contains the veiled threat – which is pretty much exactly as veiled as any threat Trump can be deemed to have made to President Zelensky in their July 2019 phone call.
If it’s a threat in one case, it’s a threat in the other. If not – not.

Note that the senators’ letter is about Ukrainian investigations inside Ukraine. It’s not simply requesting cooperation with Mueller. It’s about the senators’ concern that Yuriy Lutsenko, then the prosecutor-general, had reportedly suspended Ukrainian investigations (which might have had relevance to the Mueller operation).

That’s the same substance of Trump’s concern from his phone call with Zelensky. In 2018, the Democratic senators suggested that Ukraine had been pressured by Trump to drop investigations in Ukraine. In his phone call with Zelensky, Trump spoke of similar foot-dragging by the previous Ukrainian government, due to its connections with (implicitly) the Obama administration, including an ambassador appointed by Obama who had remained in place well into Trump’s presidency.

No double standard is tolerable here. If it’s nefarious for Trump to address such an issue with Ukraine, it’s nefarious for the senators to address it.

If it’s appropriate for the senators to address it, it’s at least as appropriate for Trump to address it. It’s probably more appropriate for Trump, given his constitutional powers over foreign relations and the concerns of the executive branch (e.g., the Department of Justice).

Who has the preponderance of evidence on his side? You, my dear friend, do not know. I may have an opinion, but I don’t pretend to know either. I do, however, take the only fair position, which is that the whole thing needs a scrub, and one that’s transparent to the public. No action against Trump is conscionable until the facts have been established to an objective standard of fairness.

I don’t have the slightest problem if all the evidence about what everyone has done is made public, up to and including the president. But that must include everything that is found out about what Democratic politicians, political operatives, bureaucrats, and the media have done.

Although I do trust the integrity of William Barr and John Durham, I’ve agreed with Alan Dershowitz for some time that the responsible thing would be to appoint a congressional commission, one in which Republicans and Democrats have equal power to enforce transparency and balance, to ultimately sort this thing out. Moreover, the mainstream media cannot be trusted as the privileged brokers of information from such a commission. The commission should be on the hook, by its charter from Congress, to issue regular updates; if necessary (and I would say it’s necessary) from parallel Republican and Democratic websites set up for the purpose. The “big tech” owners must be constrained by transparently-validated monitoring — and yes, I mean third-party snooping on their algorithms and other software arrangements, also publicized regularly — to give both websites the exact same treatment, so that there is no impediment to the public in accessing them equally.

Until Congress is prepared to charter such a commission, Durham’s investigation for the DOJ will have to do.

All that said, the “cosmic justice” effect does keep kicking in, and every attempt by the Left to attack Trump keeps exposing the Left’s own machinations and bad faith. It may be that if we just wait for the Democrats and the mainstream media to go their length, we will get the investigative effect of a congressional commission in the end, without having to appoint one. Perhaps our legacy leadership class shouldn’t be remembered for behaving responsibly. Perhaps such a protracted melodrama of ignominy and self-owning is all that class is due, as its departing gift to America.

libertyunyielding.com/2019/09/25/cant-make-this-up-in-2018-senate-democrats-sent-ukrainian-prosecutor-a-letter-asking-him-to-investigate-trump/

Views: 41

Reply to This

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted a blog post

Always Wondering

The face of reality pressed against your window paneIs it engineered or is it real rain?So, you…See More
12 hours ago
tjdavis favorited Burbia's video
yesterday
tjdavis posted a photo
yesterday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
yesterday
cheeki kea posted a photo
yesterday
rlionhearted_3 posted a photo
yesterday
Sandy posted photos
yesterday
james will posted a blog post

how to doanload mp3 online?

An MP3 downloader is a useful online tool that allows users to convert and download their favorite…See More
Wednesday
Doc Vega commented on rlionhearted_3's photo
Thumbnail

Another incredibly Stupid!! What, no mirrors?

"Personally , I go for the more classic forms of cosmetic surgery! "
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Tuesday
Less Prone favorited tjdavis's video
Tuesday
Less Prone commented on rlionhearted_3's photo
Thumbnail

Another incredibly Stupid!! What, no mirrors?

"When the problem is inside, it causes transformations like this. I like the original better. Maybe…"
Tuesday
Less Prone favorited james will's blog post YouTube Downloader Tools You Never Knew Existed
Tuesday
james will posted a blog post

YouTube Downloader Tools You Never Knew Existed

A YouTube downloader is an online tool or software that helps convert YouTube videos into…See More
Tuesday
tjdavis posted a video

Experimenter - Official Trailer

Like on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/experimenterfilmYale University, 1961. Stanley Milgram (Peter Sarsgaard) designs a psychology experiment that stil...
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

How Did the Soviets First Discover the SR-71 Blackbird?

Although President Lydon Johnson announced the development of the Lockheed SR-71 in 1964 which…See More
Sunday
Doc Vega commented on Burbia's blog post Disgraced Former CNN Anchor Don Lemon Arrested
"Personally, I don't consider Don Lemon or people like him to be journalists at all. They are…"
Sunday
tjdavis posted photos
Jan 31
tjdavis favorited Doc Vega's blog post The Forbidden Canyon and It’s Residents
Jan 31
tjdavis posted a video

The Farmer vs the Billionaire — Jeremy Clarkson Says NO to Bill Gates’ £100 Million Deal | UK News

OFFICIAL NOTICE: This channel is NOT Jeremy Clarkson, is not affiliated with him, and does not represent his official views or Diddly Squat Farm. This is an ...
Jan 31

© 2026   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted