Christopher Rodia and Sandy Hook

Sandy Hook continues to walk on broken legs
by Jeff Prager

FIRST, Inconsistencies in news reports are not evidence of a cover up, they're evidence of confusion and bad reporting. If they can broadcast the wrong name for the shooter without verifying it first, then nothing much else they say in the first few hours can really be relied upon. To seize on such things as evidence of a conspiracy is both bad taste and poor judgment.

Today Dr. Jamnes Fetzer will be discussing Christopher Rodia on the Real Deal Radio Show. You might want to listen to it. If you do, please keep the facts below in mind. I'm not happy that I'm forced to admit certain things below but they put this theory in perspective and I have no choice.

When people write about something they need to have, in some cases, first hand knowledge and in Dr. Fetzers referenced article the author lacks first hand knowledge, employs sensationalism and gets almost everything WRONG.

Christopher Rodia is being portrayed as a criminal who was "turned" because of his potential "serious jail time" for "7 felony charges" and is therefore somehow connected to the Sandy Hook shootings.

The CIA or some unknown intelligence agency enlisted Rodia as an operative. Personally I wouldn't enlist Rodia to shovel snow but that's not the point really. Let's examine this.

Rodia has 5 felony charges and 1 misdemeanor charge. NOT 7 FELONY CHARGES as the article Dr. Fetzer references states. That would be MY first clue that the article is sensationalized. Dr. Fetzer misses this.

*The author uses "7 felony charges" throughout the article and personally, I prefer to read articles by people that are capable of correctly counting to ten. The charge sheet image is posted as part of the essay so the author should be able to count the charges.

But does this also constitute "serious jail time" ?

The charges on July 28th of this year are:

1. Larceny 3rd degree
This is theft involving a retail value above $1000 in Connecticut

2. Conspiracy to Commit Larceny 3rd degree

3. Possession Of Narcotics
Based on the next charge one can presume that Rodia had pills that weren't in their proper container. This doesn't mean it was legal for him to have them and they were properly prescribed though they might be. We don't know. It does mean that he wasn't charged with "sales" because the number of pills he had was minimal or the next charge wouldn't be possible.

4. Failure to keep Narcotics in Original Containers

5. Criminal Mischief 3rd degree

6. The Misdemeanor - Criminal Trespass 1st degree

It's said that these charges mean "serious jail time" in the essay Dr. Fetzer references but is that true? No.

In 1986 I was charged federally with 50 counts of mail fraud (18 USC Chapter 63) and 1 count of Causing An Act To Be Done (18 USC 2 - Sec. 2).

I already had 2 previous marijuana felony convictions and a previous conviction for violation of probation, also a felony.

In the USA 96% of criminal convictions result from plea bargains. Trials are VERY rare. The prosecution always offers a plea bargain before trial, EVERY TIME, and in some cases, but few, they offer a second lesser plea if the first isn't accepted by the defendant. 96% of people accept the plea. This is how the system works.

I was offered to plead guilty to 1 count of Causing An Act To Be Done and received 5 years federal probation. I received NO jail time, had 3 previous felony convictions and this was, at that time, the largest office supply telemarketing bust in US history. My name is not mentioned but here's a link to the federal case:

Link To Telemarketing Fraud Article

Rodia is NOT facing "serious jail time" as the article suggests but Dr. Fetzer, I presume, would have you believe so.

Dennis Rodia, Christopher Rodias brother, 44, and his mother Lilli Rodia, 67, of 1 Gregory Blvd., Norwalk, were charged with possession of narcotics (40 bags of heroin and 61 pills), possession of narcotics with intent to sell, illegal possession of narcotics within 1,500 feet of a school and possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1,500 feet of a school. As you can see, these charges DO represent serious jail time because they're egregious (sales and school) and the two are being held in lieu of $100,000 bond as we would expect. Still, I'll suggest that the plea will be to a single lesser charge with minimal jail time or probation for Dennis and probation for his Mom. That's an opinion of course. You should be able to follow the case if you desire.

I've been convicted of felonies 6 times and I've NEVER spent more than 1 night in jail. I was released on my promise to appear ALL 6 TIMES. This is standard procedure in the court system for non-violent crimes.

The article Dr. Fetzer references also states that "and he was apparently released from custody just a few months ago on his own ““promise to appear”” (?) Really?" This is stated as it is because the author has likely never been arrested and the "(?) Really?" is added because the author is wanting to sensationalize the essay to draw people in to his fraudulent conclusions. The other option is that the author is a moron as you'll see as we examine this article further.

EVERY time I was arrested I was released on what's called a Personal Recognizance Bond which is essentially a promise to appear. I was released all 6 times after the initial arrest on my word that I'd appear on the court dates. So was Rodia. This is not unusual. Presumably he has fewer previous charges than I did and even after my 6th felony arrest I was released OR (own recognizance). The system is NOT designed to hold every human being charged with a crime. Only violent or especially egregious criminals are caused to post bail. Dr. Fetzer misses this also.

The article then states, "Lt. Vance is asked a question about whether or not Adam Lanza’’s mother actually worked at the school and he inexplicably starts to answer a question about the guy they may or may not have arrested in the woods behind the school. Does it sound like Lt. Vance is running on a tight script?"

Is That True? A tight script? Leading to images of a false flag?

No.

The police officer avoided a question whose answer would mean NOTHING. Whether he answered the question "Yes," "No," or whether he didn't answer the question at all is MEANINGLESS. It matters little whether his mother worked at the school because we now know that she didn't even though it was reported incorrectly early on that she did. Avoiding this question proves one thing. He didn't yet know the answer or didn't want to answer it. For whatever reason he may not have wanted to answer it, it's still meaningless. There's nothing suspicious about not answering this question. Please, explain to me what the officer is hiding and how this leads to a false flag conclusion?

If this was a false flag the officer would have responded that the mother did not work at the school so that the story maintained consistency since it was already reported and corrected that she did not work at the school. Very likely he didn't want to answer a stupid question that had already been addressed repeatedly elsewhere.

It's already been established that Lanzas Mom didn't work at the school. This is not fodder for conspiracy.

The article goes on.

"But it is worth noting that often times when running a psyop, the Feds get someone who is facing serious time to do their little dirty work for them. In this case, an obvious drug addict facing 7 felony counts who’’s mother is facing 6 herself. Could that be motive enough to do something like this?"

AGAIN, it's 5 felonies and 1 misdemeanor NOT 7 FELONIES and these crimes are NOT anywhere even near enough to coerce someone to participate in the murder of 28 people.

The article gets worse.

"Those CIs are almost always in trouble with the law, charismatic people who can manipulate weaker people."

Would you characterize Christopher Rodia as "charismatic"? We don't know one damn thing about his character and it would require a psychologist or psychiatrist to make that kind of assessment but at face value, Christopher Rodia very likely lacks any and all charisma. Dr. Fetzer ignores this also.

And even worse.

"UPDATE: A reader, mangrove, found this view on Bing’’s earth view thingy. Seems like it could easily be the same car. I know there had been some question if the Google Earth app had the right home picked out. Seems like the same one posted on Bing."

Using a blurry picture of a home that the author admits may not be the right home of a car we can only see as a dark blur the author creates another spurious piece of "evidence" that no attorney or even civilian would use to support a theory. In the picture we can't even tell what kind of car it is. A dark blur. Dr. Fetzer is OK with using this.

It could easily NOT be the same car and very likely isn't the same car as you'll soon see below.

Then, this "juicy tidbit" (to use the same type of sensationalism):

"He was busted with a 19 year old girl. Lovely guy huh?"

The article FAILS to mention that this 19-year old girl is Rodias cousin, NOT a young kid this 42-year old man is having a sexual relationship with as the article infers.

He's not a dirty old man but hanging out with his cousin yet I'm sure you can see the sensationalism the article builds. AND the article fails to mention she's his cousin even after it lists 10 other relatives of the Rodias. Coincidence? NO. Sensationalism? YES.

Then we have a comment possibly posted by Rodia himself!

"this is chris rodia and you assholes have nothing better to do then to try and connect me to what may be the most evil crime in our life time....i got caught with 2 (two) 5mg percocet not in the correct bottle and you think i would commit  murder for that, let along 20 beautiful children,my prayers go out to the families of those angels and they have suffered enough,now you are making my family suffer and live in fear and there is no connection,the car in my driveway is not mine,its not even the same make or model...look it up"

Being that the comment states "2 5mg percocet" I will make the claim that the comment WAS posted by Rodia himself. Who else would know that? Time will tell.

Towards the end of the comments we have the following which, of course, everyone ignores including Dr. Fetzer.

Nikki Alexander, on December 27, 2012 at 2:55 pm said:

"One thing to bear in mind is that the radioman911 recording has mixed frequencies and includes the CT state police. You will hear many plate descriptions throughout that have nothing to do with Sandy Hook. That plate reading is not on the Fairfield County track. The radioman911 YEO plate description is at 0:30:19 at 10:05am. You don’t hear it on this recording:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9klblvRFzaI

But you DO hear other on-site offcers giving details that are not heard on the radioman911 track. The photo of 872 YEO on the tow trailer is attributed to Michelle McLoughlin/Reuters. Maybe it was mis-tagged as Lanza’’s vehicle in the caption? It is raining in that photo and there is a house in the background. The weather and scenery doesn’’t seem to match Sandy Hook Elementary School.

The plate on the taped-off  black car in the fire lane at the school is fuzzy but it is definitely [is] not  872YEO.

THANK YOU Nikki Alexander!

Also, we have a long gun being removed from TWO DIFFERENT cars. Maybe some of you have seen these videos. An officer approaches a trunk alone, removes a rifle of some type and rapidly walks away in one of the overhead video and in another an officer opens a trunk, ejects a shell and examines a rifle with gloved hands with other people surrounding him. Two different guns. Two different cars. So it seems at this point. I've seen both videos but can't confirm positively that both are from Sandy Hook though it seems that they are.

NOTHING attached to Christopher Rodia is suspicious or leads to the conclusion that Sandy Hook was a false flag and in no way is Christopher Rodia connected to Sandy Hook. And believe me, there's no shortage of people believing the lies attached to Sandy Hook.

Worse, the article Dr. Fetzer relies on is sensationalized bunk from start to finish.

What does lead to Sandy Hook being a false flag is people using erroneous data and then sensationalizing that spurious and fraudulent data such that people that DON'T investigate these issues or don't know any better are led to believe LIES.

Dr. Fetzer is a very intelligent man. I have no doubt he'll walk the line on this issue refusing to take a particular stance while asking the questions he feels are necessary.

However, in light of the elements I pointed out above I consider it akin to fraud to even have this discussion since it's clear that Christopher Rodia has NOTHING to do with Sandy Hook. Maybe Dr. Fetzer will imply that this is what he's trying to point out? I think that's unlikely, but possible.

~ Jeff Prager

*** I've posted the full article with the comments that Dr. Fetzer is using on his radio show today at Data File Host if you care to download it. Please, USE THE SMALLER DOWNLOAD BUTTON ON THE LEFT. The larger download button is an advertisement.

Fetzer Essay