This December, leaders of the industrialized world will gather in Copenhagen to frame an international strategy against "climate change" to take the place of Kyoto.

Many in the mainstream media would have you believe that someone must be crazy to voice skepticism toward the idea that human carbon emissions cause significant and disastrous global warming.

They don't usually call it "global warming" anymore. The lingo for a few years has been "climate change," since it provides a much more rhetorically strong ground from which to deride skeptics. Lambasting those who "deny climate change" is more compelling than to scoff, "how could you deny the earth is warming?" Especially now that we know it has been cooling for a decade.

So it's cooling now, but the real problem, we are told, is climate change -- as caused by human emissions of carbon -- particularly with an alleged long-term trend toward warming. Real and alleged cataclysms of nature -- everything from Katrina to spiders getting bigger -- has been blamed on our greenhouse gases.

Merely to express doubt of this theory has been called "treason against the planet" by Paul Krugman, who probably speaks for a large segment of left-liberals. It is seen as unseemly, unpatriotic and hysterical to wonder if humans are causing the earth to warm in unsustainable and disastrous ways. Another Nobel Prize winner, Al Gore, even said a year ago that businesses (conveniently ones that compete with his own favored industrial interests) should be censored for voicing doubt on climate change:

"I believe for a carbon company to spend money convincing the stock-buying public that the risk from the global climate crisis is not that great represents a form of stock fraud because they are misrepresenting a material fact," he said. "I hope these state attorney generals around the country will take some action on that."

Scientists who question the common wisdom are marginalized and silenced. It is considered beyond the pale to suggest, for example, that the sun -- that big ball of gas that supports the life of the planet, constituting more than 99% of the solar system's mass -- has much more effect on idiosyncratic temperature changes than human-emitted greenhouse gasses. And the fact that the carbon emissions theory was first seriously advanced by the Margaret Thatcher regime to bolster the case for nuclear power, back when the environmentalists had been worried about a "new ice age"? That's ancient history, and only a loon would bring it up.

The scientific method relies on doubt and the idea of a settled "consensus" is anathema -- although many would have us believe it's unscientific to harbor doubts. But even putting aside the question of scientific fact, there is the policy discussion, and here it makes even more sense that some of us would be skeptical. The extent to which many Americans and people in the developed world are willing to part with their liberty in the hopes that national and global bureaucracies can fine-tune the planet's weather is staggering.

At home the immediate threat is so-called "cap and trade," a scam to legalize and normalize pollution, regulate industry and impose massive costs onto the American people.

Frighteningly, the opinion that dramatic government intervention is needed to combat the alleged epidemic of human carbon emissions has become prevalent throughout much of political life. Most of the energy and auto industry is behind government action. Its necessity is professed on both sides of the aisle. Mainstream Republicans and, tragically, even personalities in the Religious Right have been echoing the establishment hysteria.

It was long assumed industry would resist regulation, but the corporatism here is clear. Just as Kyoto was backed by Enron, today's stampede toward climate change collectivism is being hailed by corporate America. Businesses get government privileges, allocated perfectly fairly I'm sure, that allow them to emit carbon. This is inherently unjust. Either carbon emissions are dangerous pollution, and such grants are a permission to commit trespass, or they're not, and it's an obscenity that government would restrict them at all. In any event, such programs are uneconomical and counterproductive.

The bureaucracy, the connected businesses, the political class, the state itself and much of the establishment stands to gain.

The American people will lose. "Cap and trade" is an effective tax hike on the middle class, and threatens to diminish our economic progress severely. Furthermore, if human carbon emissions are the nuisance that is claimed, warranting the type of worldwide governmental response as is suggested, the consequence would be a wholesale attack on individual liberty in virtually every area. Since carbon is the essence of life, simply being alive would be framed as a "cost" to the "greater good." Restrictions on consumption, home energy usage, diet, transportation choices, and even family planning could follow. This would require a growing surveillance state and central administration of American life. Already many misanthropes argue that having too many children is an irresponsible and selfish imposition upon the rest of the world. Will families suffer a one-car policy? A one-child policy? Humanity depends on carbon - a politicized war on carbon emissions will prove to be a war on human life.

On the international scene, the U.S. used to be the dissenter, heroically refusing to ratify Kyoto during the Clinton administration, but with Obama in power, we may have to hope other nations lead the resistance. It is good news that even in the EU things are not running as smoothly as some would hope. Václav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic, has been one of the world's highest-profile skeptics, for which he's been lambasted in the popular press.

But perhaps those who suffer the most will be the Third World. It has long been fashionable for a dominant political faction -- in this international context, the industrialized nations -- to suddenly discover a moral code that they had long neglected but are no longer constrained by practical concerns to flout, only to inflict it upon those who can not as easily afford it. The West got rich through an industrial revolution, and yet now many of its celebrated thinkers would deprive these blessings from those just getting started on the path out of ubiquitous and abject poverty. This makes it all the more arrogant and imperialistic for the U.S. to be pressuring China and poorer countries to cut back their own industrial progress in hopes of altering temperatures marginally over the next century.

The popular theory about anthropogenic climate change, when coupled with the policy recommendations currently being contemplated in seriousness, has broad implications for the future of humanity. Taking the steps being proposed could deepen the recession, impoverish millions of Americans, erode our personal liberty, erode the sovereignty of all nations, and deprive nearly half the world's population of its best shot out of the worst kind of poverty. It is a matter of life and death for so many. And this is all in hopes that a theory which hasn't produced any accurate models is correct that drastic action, over a hundred years, conducted and coordinated by politicians and major industry worldwide, could spare the earth about a degree less in warming - and that degree will make all the difference to the whole planet.

It would seem to me that people should find it natural, not heretical, that many people would look upon all of this with doubt.

Views: 13

Reply to This



Latest Activity

Fat Freddys Cat commented on Boris Badenov's photo

Cops: McDonald's Worker Charged In Bacon Attack -Cook tried to shove hot bacon in manager's face

"If you think thats bad, I know someone that actually ate the fucking bacon, burns heal...."
3 minutes ago
Fat Freddys Cat posted blog posts
6 minutes ago
Boris Badenov commented on Boris Badenov's page ‘Robocop’ on patrol at Singapore summit
22 minutes ago
Diana posted photos
37 minutes ago
Diana commented on Larry Flinchpaugh's photo

Israels Long Term Goal

"I think this is the final goal:"
39 minutes ago
TheBigWedding commented on raymond moody's photo
59 minutes ago
Nazda Pokmov commented on James T. Kirk's video

A Disease Spreading In Shelters - New Caldera Eruption - Tick Virus

"Those folks in the shelters are doomed with those diseases and being homeless.  That's just what the agenda wants....less people and the others to be herded into the big cities into shoeboxes to live."
1 hour ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a video
1 hour ago
Deep Space posted a video

Man wearing MAGA hat assaulted while walking downtown Tucson

Jonathan Sparks is passionate about his political beliefs, but he said those beliefs were attacked while he was walking around Tucson.
1 hour ago
Nazda Pokmov commented on James T. Kirk's status
"That video is great.  Now along with terminal stupidity....the libturds will glow at night!!!!  This is typical govt tell the sheeple everything is great and feed them dog shiit and tell them it's cream of wheat...go back to…"
1 hour ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a discussion

Is Vote Fraud Encouraged by Governments Because the Resulting Crisis Can be Used to Justify Real ID Cards?

Activist Gary Gileno says that vote fraud is orchestrated and planned, which he says is proved by the fact that no one ever goes to jail for doing it. Real ID gives the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security unprecedented power over such…See More
1 hour ago
Central Scrutinizer's group was featured

Clinton For Prison!

If it's got the last name "Clinton", it's fair game here. The…See More
1 hour ago
Cranford Ducain commented on Boris Badenov's page flashback -- Obama Kicks out reporter for asking questions; other reporters cheer!
"BUT !!!  We are talking about OBAMA here. He could then and still today can do no wrong. Just because he did something, no one else should think they can do the same and get away with it ."
2 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Boris Badenov's photo

Cops: McDonald's Worker Charged In Bacon Attack -Cook tried to shove hot bacon in manager's face

"All 'foods' are full of chemicals. It's only question of time when people will start going nuts..."
2 hours ago
Nazda Pokmov commented on James T. Kirk's status
"ALL POWER COMPANIES are owned by the Rothschilds......"
2 hours ago
Dave churbuck commented on Boris Badenov's page Ebullient CNN Reacts to Its ‘Victory’ Acosta Getting WH Press Pass Back; A Symbol of ‘Press Freedom’
" Cnn is an indicator, sympton and a reason for a failed country, being destroyed from within by traitors and allowed and assisted by the rest of the population. But then,  It only had to last Your life time, the future for the…"
2 hours ago
Boris Badenov commented on Boris Badenov's photo
2 hours ago
Inretrospect commented on Boris Badenov's page [CA] Man documents escape from Camp Fire - 25 MINUTE VIDEO
"Isn't that proposed high speed rail system going to run through to the locations of the wildfires?   In fact, U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein's husband Richard Blum, won the first phase…"
2 hours ago
Diana's photo was featured
2 hours ago
Diana commented on Boris Badenov's photo

Cops: McDonald's Worker Charged In Bacon Attack Cook tried to shove hot bacon in manager's face

"What is it with McDonald's?  There's all these shootings and that woman going nuts over ketchup."
2 hours ago

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2018   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted