He believes pedophilia should be legal. He believes that incestuous relationships with minor children should be legal. He believes child pornography should be legal. He believes marital rape should be legal. He believes the 19th amendment (giving women the right to vote) should be repealed. He believes Hitler was a hero. He believes that a man should be allowed to "choke his wife to death" for cutting her hair without permission or other acts of "gross insubordination." (Those are just the tip of the iceberg.)
His name is Nathan Larson and by June 12, 2018, he will be an official congressional candidate in Virginia.
LIBERALS HAVE BEEN TRYING TO NORMALIZE PEDOPHILIA FOR YEARS, ALSO INCEST
In 2013, the UK's Guardian claimed that "not even a full academic consensus on whether consensual pedophilic relations necessarily cause harm." In 2014, a liberal writer at the New York Times wrote a piece titled "Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime." In 2015, the liberal website Salon published a piece, which was later removed, titled "I’m a pedophile, but not a monster." In 2016, VICE encouraged sympathy for pedophiles in a piece titled "Realizing You're a Pedophile Can Make You Want to Kill Yourself."
It is not only pedophilia they are attempting to normalize, but as shown in a Telegraph article, they also claim that incest is just a "Genetic Sexual Attraction," in a story titled "Disgusted by incest? Genetic Sexual Attraction is real and on the rise." Cosmo also pushed a sympathetic view of incest in 2015 in a piece titled "This Is What It's Like to Fall in Love With Your Brother."
Readers will note there are no links to those stories above.....anyone that wants to read them can use a search engine.
The attempts by the left to normalize and decriminalize pedophilia and incest have lasting and ongoing effects, claiming people should have "open minds" on topics that were once considered taboo to even be spoken about, unless it was in court as these monsters were being prosecuted for abusing children.
Well now they have a congressional candidate, running as an independent that feels voters have "open minds" so it is fine and dandy to publicly run on a platform that includes legalizing pedophilia and incest.
THE MONSTER THEY HELPED CREATE IS NOW A NIGHTMARE
While I continue to see headlines only referencing Larson's perversions, or that he was jailed for threatening to kill Barack Obama, his other platform issues, as well as some of the things he has written publicly, found on a now defunct website by Huffpo, shows the monster that they helped create has other disturbing and vile beliefs.
Until it was pulled down, Larson’s site Nathania.org, a wiki page with details about his latest candidacy, featured posts titled “A Man Should Be Allowed to Choke His Wife to Death as Punishment for Cutting Her Hair Short Without Permission, or Other Acts of Gross Insubordination,” “Advantages of Father-Daughter Incest” and “The Justifiability of an Incel’s Kidnapping a Girl and Keeping Her as His Rape-Slave for Sex and Babymaking.” Wiki pages can be edited by other people, but Larson confirmed he wrote these posts as well as several other disturbing entries.
In “Let’s Define What Rape Is,” a 3,000-word essay posted on Nathania.org as well as other incel sites, Larson wrote: “Women are objects, to be taken care of by men like any other property, and for powerful men to insert themselves into as it pleases them, and as they believe will be in women’s own interests. In most cases, their interests are aligned, as long as the man is strong. Female sex-slaves actually get a much better deal than animals, because in most cases, they are allowed to reproduce, unlike animals raised for meat or companionship.”
When asked what his constituents would think about his pedophiliac writings, he said, “People are open-minded.”
Larson also confirmed for Huffpo that he wrote the following on a message board, using the name Lysander: "I just want to bang my daughter, actually, but even if it were legal, I’m not sure it would happen, since i don’t have custody. After sex with kids is legalized, parents (or other guardians) will still be gatekeepers to some extent, and a lot of them will want to bang their own kids and not share with others."
If that is all not disturbing enough, a look at an archived version of his website www.nathanlarson.org, which is no longer active, we see he articulated even more abhorrent views in what was labeled his "campaign manifesto."
Calling himself a "quasi-neoreactionary libertarian," he listed a 12-point agenda. When delving into the individual points, specifically the one titled "Patriarchy," we see he supports "subordinating women as sex slaves and baby factories for their husbands," and that girls should be getting married "no later than their early teens." He also describes single women as "unowned or abandoned property, since their fathers have left them to be taken by the first comer." While urging the repeal of the repeal of the Violence Against Women Act, he states "[citizens] need to switch to a system that classifies women as property, initially of their fathers and later of their husbands."
He also believes that any state funding that pays for girls and women to attend high school and college. should be abolished.
Normally we would not link to a campaign manifesto as repugnant as Larson's but since it is no longer a running website, we feel it is important for Virginia voters to understand who it is that is running by seeing his own words, assertions and "heroes," such as Hitler. (Archive.is link here)
In a 2015 article, we see that the now-deceased mother of Larson's child became a transgendered man, who in court documents described their relationship: "During our relationship, he was severely emotionally and sexually abusive towards me. He stated multiple times that he wanted to have sex with a child. He talked about how he would manipulate and trick the child into giving him sex, told me he wouldn't love the child if they did not have sex with him, and stated he had no interest in children other than sexual ... [He] raped me until I was pregnant and stated his intention to have sex with my child after she was born."
He also admitted to raping her in an email presented as evidence.
The general consensus about Nathan Larson, from both the right and the left side of the political aisle is that he a menace, dubbed the "actual worst of the internet," over at the liberal site Wonkette, yet he has managed to obtain the 1,000 signatures needed to become a candidate in June 2018, as an Independent. He submitted those signatures to the Virginia Board of Elections in May.
That means at least 1,000 people either did not know his views which includes views from the radical fringes of both the left and the right, or they knew and still supported his run.
With so many being highly disappointed in both the Democratic party and the Republican party, just seeing someone running as an independent may encourage them to cast a vote against the "two" parties by voting for Larson in the June 12 primary, so it is incredibly important that voters in the district he is running in, be aware of his actual positions.
The 1000 people who signed should be on a watch list.
yes the mere thought of this guy is repellent but there is something wrong with this entire scenario. first of all, can any of you imagine if this guy was part of your community? he would be assassinated immediately, right? yet there he is being interviewed on his own doorstep. we read the horrible things there that he said, his plans and his goals which he supposedly wrote in his "3,000-word essay", but look at the fool, he can barely formulate a thought while that woman interviews him. and it seems to me as if the woman's voice has been spliced onto things that he has said. and there is this::
""Readers will note there are no links to those stories above.....anyone that wants to read them can use a search engine.""
that would be the stupidest thing anyone could ever do, researching something like pedophilia and rape using a search engine. googling crap like that would immediately get one put on a serious watch list, yet we are urged to do just that. so of course "there are no links to those stories above", because they are probably fictional. really, do yalls actually believe that liberals endorse pedophilia? or is it just that pedophiles are liberals? - nonsense. i'll bet that most pedos are probably red-tard neocon evangelicals. and he says his hero is hitler - was hitler a liberal? i don't think so.
i think this entire thing including the guy himself is made up bullshit. look how stupid he is standing on his own porch. extra fucking stupid.