Supreme Court rules in favor of police in home searches without objector present


No title


  Walter Fernandez flatly told Los Angeles police that they could not search his home without a warrant, saying, “You don’t have any right to come in here. I know my rights.”

But the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Fernandez’s right to keep police out ended when he left the premises — even though that was only because police had arrested him and taken him to the station.

An hour later, police returned without a warrant but persuaded the woman Fernandez lived with, Roxanne Rojas, to let them look around. They found evidence that led to a host of charges that cost Fernandez 14 years in prison.

The court ruled 6 to 3 that when occupants of a dwelling disagree on whether they will admit police without a warrant, the objecting occupant must be physically present. That doesn’t change if police have removed the objector, the court said.

“An occupant who is absent due to a lawful detention or arrest stands in the same shoes as an occupant who is absent for any other reason,” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote for the majority.

Alito said there was no need for officers to obtain a warrant. When they arrived the first time, having followed Fernandez from the scene of a robbery, Rojas answered the door crying, with a bump on her nose and blood on her hands and shirt.

“Denying someone in Rojas’ position the right to allow the police to enter herhome would also show disrespect for her independence,” Alito continued. “Having beaten Rojas, petitioner would bar her from controlling access to her own home until such time as he chose to relent.”

Alito was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Stephen G. Breyer.

The Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures provides that a warrant not be issued without probable cause.

But the question of when police need a warrant for their actions is a recurring one for the justices. One obvious exception is when an occupant of a dwelling consents.

Tuesday’s ruling was a follow to a 2006 decision in which the court said the consent of one person was not enough to allow police into a dwelling when another occupant is present and objects.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented in Tuesday’s ruling, and was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Ginsburg quoted the late Justice Robert J. Jackson’s observation that the warrant requirement ranks among the “fundamental distinctions between our form of government, where officers are under the law, and the police-state where they are the law.”

She added, “Instead of adhering to the warrant requirement, today’s decision tells the police they may dodge it, never mind ample time to secure the approval of a neutral magistrate.”

The court noted just last term, Ginsburg wrote, that the speed and ease with which police may now obtain warrants — over the phone or computer lines — meant that police should generally obtain one before having blood drawn from a suspected drunken driver.

“With these developments in view, dilution of the warrant requirement should be vigilantly resisted,” she wrote.

The case is Fernandez v. California.

Ruling on frozen assets

The court also ruled Tuesday that criminal defendants who have their assets frozen when they are charged with a crime are not entitled to a hearing to claim there was not probable cause for a grand jury to indict them.

The court ruled 6 to 3 that that is the case even if the defendants are planning to use the money to hire a lawyer to defend them against the charges.

“If judicial review of the grand jury’s probable cause determination is not warranted (as we have so often held) to put a defendant on trial or place her in custody, then neither is it needed to freeze her property,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the majority.

“The grand jury that is good enough — reliable enough, protective enough — to inflict those other grave consequences” is “adequate to impose this one too.”

The case involves Kerri Kaley, a Florida sales representative for a medical device company in New York in 2005. She contends that she was legally allowed to resell items the hospitals no longer wanted, but for two years she, her husband, Brian, and others were the subjects of a grand jury investigation of whether illegal sales occurred, and they retained counsel to fight the charges. They put aside $500,000 to pay the lawyers in the event they were indicted.

That happened in 2007, and the government moved to freeze the couple’s assets, including the money set aside for legal fees. The government said the money was the product of their alleged offenses.

While their fight has gone on, two other sales representatives have pleaded guilty, but a third defendant was acquitted by a jury.

Some courts around the country allow hearings such as the Kaleys want, but Kagan said that in none of them has a defendant been able to show that probable cause was lacking. Certainly, she said, the Constitution does not require it.

Roberts dissented, and was joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.

“Few things could do more to undermine the criminal justice system’s integrity than to allow the government to initiate a prosecution and then, at its option, disarm its presumptively innocent opponent by depriving him of his counsel of choice — without even an opportunity to be heard,” Roberts wrote.

The case is Kaley v. U.S.

Robert Barnes

Views: 59

Latest Activity

Burbia replied to MAC's discussion Target Sells LGBTQ Clothing For Children, Funds Group Whose Founder Praised NAMBLA Defender
21 minutes ago
Burbia replied to Central Scrutinizer's discussion Bought a Berkey!
"They are great people at Berkey. Was star struck a bit when the lady on the phone was also on Infowars. I had a similar experience with them. I couldn't stop laughing with my Berkey, Infowars membership and that Tang powder food suplement. I…"
27 minutes ago
Sweettina2 posted videos
38 minutes ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited James T. Kirk's video
1 hour ago
MAC posted a discussion
2 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Dr. Frederick Meekins's blog post Producers Hint Batman May Never Return To Television
2 hours ago
Raz Putin replied to Central Scrutinizer's discussion Bought a Berkey!
"Sweet!!!"
2 hours ago
Raz Putin favorited Central Scrutinizer's discussion Bought a Berkey!
2 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer's discussion was featured

Bought a Berkey!

I had been saying it for 4 years, " I'm going to get a water purifier when I can afford one damn it"Well I finally ordered a…See More
3 hours ago
Raz Putin favorited Anti Everything's blog post Medical Industrial Corporations Will Kill You
3 hours ago
Raz Putin favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post Template for Australians.
3 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer posted a discussion

Bought a Berkey!

I had been saying it for 4 years, " I'm going to get a water purifier when I can afford one damn it"Well I finally ordered a…See More
3 hours ago
Phyllis Maka's blog post was featured

Who Are 'They' really? These Scandalous Troublemakers! Want To Rule & Hog Every Leetle Thing In Sight, Every Where They Go!

Former US lawmaker Cynthia McKinney says every candidate for Congress has to sign a pledge to vote for supporting the military superiority of Israel.…See More
3 hours ago
Dr. Frederick Meekins's blog post was featured

Producers Hint Batman May Never Return To Television

In the Gotham series finale, viewers were provided a glimpse of the time when the characters had developed into their forms most remember either from the comics or other media.However, according to a story posted at SyFyWire, there is a likelihood…See More
3 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters's blog post was featured

Consumer Reports Recommends Sunscreens That Seep Poison Into Your Bloodstream

Story at-a-glanceAll of the recommended products in Consumer Reports Best Sunscreens for 2019 report contain oxybenzoneA pilot study by the U.S. FDA shows four common active ingredients in sunscreen — avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene and ecamsule…See More
3 hours ago
Raz Putin's blog post was featured

Breaking:"Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins released the transcripts of nine key figures from the House investigation into DOJ and FBI political activity."

Looks like there could be some worthwhile reading here folks let's hope. Breaking:"Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug…See More
3 hours ago
Raz Putin favorited Chris of the family Masters's photo
3 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters's 2 photos were featured
3 hours ago
Diana's 4 photos were featured
3 hours ago
Raz Putin favorited Chris of the family Masters's photo
3 hours ago

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted