Supreme Court rules in favor of police in home searches without objector present

No title

  Walter Fernandez flatly told Los Angeles police that they could not search his home without a warrant, saying, “You don’t have any right to come in here. I know my rights.”

But the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Fernandez’s right to keep police out ended when he left the premises — even though that was only because police had arrested him and taken him to the station.

An hour later, police returned without a warrant but persuaded the woman Fernandez lived with, Roxanne Rojas, to let them look around. They found evidence that led to a host of charges that cost Fernandez 14 years in prison.

The court ruled 6 to 3 that when occupants of a dwelling disagree on whether they will admit police without a warrant, the objecting occupant must be physically present. That doesn’t change if police have removed the objector, the court said.

“An occupant who is absent due to a lawful detention or arrest stands in the same shoes as an occupant who is absent for any other reason,” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote for the majority.

Alito said there was no need for officers to obtain a warrant. When they arrived the first time, having followed Fernandez from the scene of a robbery, Rojas answered the door crying, with a bump on her nose and blood on her hands and shirt.

“Denying someone in Rojas’ position the right to allow the police to enter herhome would also show disrespect for her independence,” Alito continued. “Having beaten Rojas, petitioner would bar her from controlling access to her own home until such time as he chose to relent.”

Alito was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Stephen G. Breyer.

The Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures provides that a warrant not be issued without probable cause.

But the question of when police need a warrant for their actions is a recurring one for the justices. One obvious exception is when an occupant of a dwelling consents.

Tuesday’s ruling was a follow to a 2006 decision in which the court said the consent of one person was not enough to allow police into a dwelling when another occupant is present and objects.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented in Tuesday’s ruling, and was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Ginsburg quoted the late Justice Robert J. Jackson’s observation that the warrant requirement ranks among the “fundamental distinctions between our form of government, where officers are under the law, and the police-state where they are the law.”

She added, “Instead of adhering to the warrant requirement, today’s decision tells the police they may dodge it, never mind ample time to secure the approval of a neutral magistrate.”

The court noted just last term, Ginsburg wrote, that the speed and ease with which police may now obtain warrants — over the phone or computer lines — meant that police should generally obtain one before having blood drawn from a suspected drunken driver.

“With these developments in view, dilution of the warrant requirement should be vigilantly resisted,” she wrote.

The case is Fernandez v. California.

Ruling on frozen assets

The court also ruled Tuesday that criminal defendants who have their assets frozen when they are charged with a crime are not entitled to a hearing to claim there was not probable cause for a grand jury to indict them.

The court ruled 6 to 3 that that is the case even if the defendants are planning to use the money to hire a lawyer to defend them against the charges.

“If judicial review of the grand jury’s probable cause determination is not warranted (as we have so often held) to put a defendant on trial or place her in custody, then neither is it needed to freeze her property,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the majority.

“The grand jury that is good enough — reliable enough, protective enough — to inflict those other grave consequences” is “adequate to impose this one too.”

The case involves Kerri Kaley, a Florida sales representative for a medical device company in New York in 2005. She contends that she was legally allowed to resell items the hospitals no longer wanted, but for two years she, her husband, Brian, and others were the subjects of a grand jury investigation of whether illegal sales occurred, and they retained counsel to fight the charges. They put aside $500,000 to pay the lawyers in the event they were indicted.

That happened in 2007, and the government moved to freeze the couple’s assets, including the money set aside for legal fees. The government said the money was the product of their alleged offenses.

While their fight has gone on, two other sales representatives have pleaded guilty, but a third defendant was acquitted by a jury.

Some courts around the country allow hearings such as the Kaleys want, but Kagan said that in none of them has a defendant been able to show that probable cause was lacking. Certainly, she said, the Constitution does not require it.

Roberts dissented, and was joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.

“Few things could do more to undermine the criminal justice system’s integrity than to allow the government to initiate a prosecution and then, at its option, disarm its presumptively innocent opponent by depriving him of his counsel of choice — without even an opportunity to be heard,” Roberts wrote.

The case is Kaley v. U.S.

Robert Barnes

Views: 55



Latest Activity

cheeki kea commented on Deep Space's blog post How are those Drumph Tariffs workin' out for ya? Same microwave I bought at Lowes a few weeks ago for $190 is now a $100 more (everywhere)
"Wow, It must have been a very posh microwave oven you got ds. A crisp n' Grill type ? I see standard prices of around $130 and twice that or so for crisp/grill. I don't have a mic.oven myself though."
9 minutes ago
dogitydog replied to Chris of the family Masters's discussion Bizarre Vaccination Ritual.
"To be more accurate, the poisoning begins within the first minutes of life. They don't waste any time to start jabbing them with their death probes. Chance of a newborn baby contracting Hep B: 0% From the package insert of Recombivax Hep B…"
19 minutes ago
cheeki kea favorited DTOM's video
46 minutes ago
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's status
"well thanks Boris, word is these auto painters have snuck into Perth, and aussies better watch out, who knows whats to happen to skippy and blinky bill once paint brush goes in hand, I bet there's 101 compromising positions already sketched…"
2 hours ago
Gralton favorited Fat Freddys Cat's discussion Pentagon Denies Developing Biological Weapons at Lugar Center in Georgia (Well...I'm relieved that's sorted out then)
2 hours ago
Gralton favorited Chris of the family Masters's discussion EMERGENCY REPORT: Signed Executive Orders reveal Trump is planning mass arrests, military tribunals for deep state traitors like Comey, Clinton and Obama Sunday, September 23, 2018 by: Mike Adams
2 hours ago
Boris Badenov favorited Boris Badenov's photo
2 hours ago
Gralton favorited Raz Putin's discussion LOL!"Chaos at the White House: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein DOESN'T resign and isn't fired over plans to wiretap Trump and use 25th Amendment to oust him – but ends up attending Cabinet meet
2 hours ago
Gralton favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post TRUMP – EITHER A KING- OR A-CORPSE
2 hours ago
Gralton favorited luggnutz's blog post William Cooper's Explanation of the Symbology in Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey
3 hours ago
Gralton favorited Exposure's blog post Super Strength Soldier? - MKULTRA? - Clones? - Best Evidence To Date! Where is Sabina Eriksson-M6 Moment of Madness Killer?©
3 hours ago
Gralton favorited Deep Space's blog post US to stay in Syria so long as ‘Iranians’ are there – Bolton - FU DRUMPH FOR HIRING THIS ZIONIST POS NEOCUNT - THE IRANIANS WERE *INVITED* BY SYRIA; UNLIKE THE INVADING TERRORIST AMERIKKKUNTS
3 hours ago
skip barker commented on Deep Space's video

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is A Sack Of Fertilizer With Glasses - Needs To Retire ASAP!

"Fertilizer serves a great purpose, so I would put her jew ass into human turd category, for it has no use once expelled."
3 hours ago
skip barker posted discussions
3 hours ago
Deep Space replied to Chuck Smith's discussion MIKE ADAMS (NATURAL NEWS) JOINS THE FOOLS!
"If that's true; that's a huge disappointment. "
3 hours ago
Chuck Smith replied to Chuck Smith's discussion MIKE ADAMS (NATURAL NEWS) JOINS THE FOOLS!
"Natural News keeps deleting this post in the comements. HYPOCRACY on sensorship?"
4 hours ago
Raz Putin replied to Raz Putin's discussion LOL!"Chaos at the White House: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein DOESN'T resign and isn't fired over plans to wiretap Trump and use 25th Amendment to oust him – but ends up attending Cabinet meet
4 hours ago
Deep Space commented on Nathan A. Bauer's blog post USAma Bin Laden died in December, 2001 of Marfan Syndrome
"Yeah, Obama killed Bin Laden 10 years after he died. Kinda reminds me of how Drumph "fixed" the US economy with 100 million Americans out of work."
4 hours ago
Deep Space commented on Deep Space's blog post Off The Deep End - 'Deep Space' Free-Flow Thoughts (An Ongoing Eruption)
"The Bible is my third favorite fantasy novel right after 'Game Of Thrones' & 'The Lord Of The Rings'. I would have ranked it higher but my biggest gripe about it was that it wasn't really that realistic. "
4 hours ago
Deep Space commented on Deep Space's blog post Off The Deep End - 'Deep Space' Free-Flow Thoughts (An Ongoing Eruption)
"I look at what the fake Ashkenazi jews are doing in Palestine to the Palestinians & I can't help but think that Hitler was right about those assholes. Plus the whole 9/11 thing they orchestrated... They seriously irritate me... I know the…"
4 hours ago

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2018   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted