Amid airport anger, GOP takes aim at screening

Amid airport anger, GOP takes aim at screening
TAGS: Byron York El Al house committee on transportation and infrastructure Israel Janet Napolitano John Mica Politics screening of passengers by observation techniques SPOT Transportation Security Administration
Comments (0) Share Print By: Byron York 11/15/10 12:00 AM
Chief Political Correspondent
Did you know that the nation's airports are not required to have Transportation Security Administration screeners checking passengers at security checkpoints? The 2001 law creating the TSA gave airports the right to opt out of the TSA program in favor of private screeners after a two-year period. Now, with the TSA engulfed in controversy and hated by millions of weary and sometimes humiliated travelers, Rep. John Mica, the Republican who will soon be chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, is reminding airports that they have a choice.

Mica, one of the authors of the original TSA bill, has recently written to the heads of more than 150 airports nationwide suggesting they opt out of TSA screening. "When the TSA was established, it was never envisioned that it would become a huge, unwieldy bureaucracy which was soon to grow to 67,000 employees," Mica writes. "As TSA has grown larger, more impersonal, and administratively top-heavy, I believe it is important that airports across the country consider utilizing the opt-out provision provided by law."

In addition to being large, impersonal, and top-heavy, what really worries critics is that the TSA has become dangerously ineffective. Its specialty is what those critics call "security theater" -- that is, a show of what appear to be stringent security measures designed to make passengers feel more secure without providing real security. "That's exactly what it is," says Mica. "It's a big Kabuki dance."

Now, the dance has gotten completely out of hand. And like lots of fliers -- I spoke to him as he waited for a flight at the Orlando airport -- Mica sees TSA's new "naked scanner" machines and groping, grossly invasive passenger pat-downs as just part of a larger problem. TSA, he says, is relying more on passenger humiliation than on practices that are proven staples of airport security.

For example, many security experts have urged TSA to adopt techniques, used with great success by the Israeli airline El Al, in which passengers are observed, profiled, and most importantly, questioned before boarding planes. So TSA created a program known as SPOT -- Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques. It began hiring what it called behavior detection officers, who would be trained to notice passengers who acted suspiciously. TSA now employs about 3,000 behavior detection officers, stationed at about 160 airports across the country.

The problem is, they're doing it all wrong. A recent Government Accountability Office study found that TSA "deployed SPOT nationwide without first validating the scientific basis for identifying suspicious passengers in an airport environment." They haven't settled on the standards needed to stop bad actors.

"It's not an Israeli model, it's a TSA, screwed-up model," says Mica. "It should actually be the person who's looking at the ticket and talking to the individual. Instead, they've hired people to stand around and observe, which is a bastardization of what should be done."

In a May 2010 letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Mica noted that the GAO "discovered that since the program's inception, at least 17 known terrorists ... have flown on 24 different occasions, passing through security at eight SPOT airports." One of those known terrorists was Faisal Shahzad, who made it past SPOT monitors onto a Dubai-bound plane at New York's JFK International Airport not long after trying to set off a car bomb in Times Square. Federal agents nabbed him just before departure.

Mica and other critics in Congress want to see quick and meaningful changes in the way TSA works. They go back to the days just after Sept. 11, when there was a hot debate about whether the new passenger-screening force would be federal employees, as most Democrats wanted, or private contractors, as most Republicans wanted. Democrats won and TSA has been growing ever since.

But the law did allow a test program in which five airports were allowed to use private contractors. A number of studies done since then have shown that contractors perform a bit better than federal screeners, and they're also more flexible and open to innovation. (The federal government pays the cost of screening whether performed by the TSA or by contractors, and contractors work under federal supervision.)

TSA critics know a federal-to-private change won't solve all of the problems with airport security. But it might create the conditions under which some of those problems could indeed be fixed. With passenger anger overflowing and new leadership in the House, something might finally get done.

Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blogposts appear on ExaminerPolitics.com.



Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2010/11/amid-airport-anger-g...

Patriot Comments:
The 2001 law creating the TSA gave airports the right to opt out of the TSA program in favor of private screeners after a two-year period. Two years was too long, and Airports need to take advantage of this, and kick TSA out of their Airports! TSA has gone too far, and violated the rights of too many American's! I'll end this on a quote from one of our founding fathers. They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Benjamin Franklin,

Amen Benjamin Franklin! God save the Republic!

Views: 33

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Latest Activity

Chris of the family Masters favorited dogitydog's discussion OOOPS!
1 minute ago
Doud Jamal favorited Boris's video
1 minute ago
Diana was featured
2 minutes ago
Raz Putin replied to dogitydog's discussion OOOPS!
"Curious to see if she ever surfaces in the public again. Proof of life would be good."
2 minutes ago
Chris of the family Masters replied to dogitydog's discussion OOOPS!
"Interview on the camera should do..."
2 minutes ago
Chris of the family Masters posted discussions
5 minutes ago
Raz Putin favorited dogitydog's discussion OOOPS!
6 minutes ago
Marklar's Ghost favorited Central Scrutinizer's blog post TECHNOLOGY EXPERT CLAIMS HUMANS WILL DOWNLOAD THEIR SOULS ONTO MICROCHIPS SO THEY CAN ‘LIVE FOREVER’
6 minutes ago
Marklar's Ghost commented on Central Scrutinizer's blog post TECHNOLOGY EXPERT CLAIMS HUMANS WILL DOWNLOAD THEIR SOULS ONTO MICROCHIPS SO THEY CAN ‘LIVE FOREVER’
"Yeah, absolutely immortal just like all those AOL CDs,.. putting your soul on media has gotta werk."
6 minutes ago
Mark Janik left a comment for Chris of the family Masters
"Thank you, Chris."
6 minutes ago
Raz Putin favorited Nikki's blog post 'You filthy, abnormal animal’: graphic contents of anonymous letter sent by FBI to Martin Luther King
8 minutes ago
Boris commented on Boris's page 12160 Administrators
"12160 Administrators"
9 minutes ago
Mark Janik left a comment for Diana
"Thank you, Diana."
10 minutes ago
Doud Jamal posted a blog post

Excellent article, from a REAL America First, REAL CONSERVATIVE

Take a look at THIS, found on Russia Insider;…See More
14 minutes ago
Mark Janik and Chris of the family Masters are now friends
18 minutes ago
Profile Icon via Twitter
50 years ago Monty Python's Flying Circus debuted with this scene https://t.co/VsORG0yepY
Twitter24 minutes ago · Reply · Retweet

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted