The vast majority of people in the world would think you are a raving lunatic tinfoil head for even daring to suggest something as outlandish as saying no aircraft crashed into the twin towers on 9/11. I’ve thought it myself as after all we all know what see on TV, we’ve closely examined the footage and watched it time and again - and yes - there’s a air-plane alright - then a big explosions to top-it-off with.

But hold-on there - for anyone questioning what really happened on 9/11 then this film footage is a must, be prepared and open your mind, stop being hoodwinked. Many have seen this before as it was made over two years ago - yet many more need to see this most credible and feasible of explanations made by Richard H Hall as it's the best ever 9/11 evidence and theory you will have heard to date.

Now don’t get too excited - as even Richard knows himself that what the majority of people are seeing in the skies are UFO’s - simply ‘unidentified flying objects’ - and that it’s very probable they are man-made objects using advanced technology that we’ve had for years and especially since the 1960's space programme.

The film footage you are about to see shows a "unidentified flying object" appear from the sky and in the exact pathway the alleged aircraft had meant to have taken before making a sudden impact on the tower.

Experts has previously said that some type of pod/missile was added-onto the bottom of the aircraft and can been seen in the CNN footage - that you’ll discover must actually be fake and that the aircraft was “added” after this “UFO” appears to have hit the tower and used to disguise this fact that a craft-pod-sphere like advanced technical weapon was used to help destroy and bring down the twin towers - and not the commercial jet liner the world obviously believes did.

Richard H. Hall graduated as an electrical engineering in 1990 and worked on engineering projects for NEI (latterly Rolls Royce) from 1986 until 2002, when he left the profession to work as a freelance IT consultant and web designer - and now so happens to be an expert on UFO sightings, a TV presenter and investigative journalist.  Many people will try and have ridiculed people who believe in UFO phenomenon, though don't worry opening your minds, just open your eyes - this footage is real and it has to be questioned.  Not a mention of this "UFO" footage has ever appeared in the mainstream media. 

In 2012 Richard carried out analysis of 9/11 radar and video evidence of flight 175 as it appeared to impact on the world trade centres South Tower. Video and radar data shows that the object was travelling at around 580 miles per hour. Most pilots agree that 580 miles per hour is an impossible speed for a 767 travelling near sea level. Not only that, close up videos showing the alleged plane impacting on the side of the tower show completely impossible impact dynamics. So with two major impossibilities the question arises, what was actually used? By studying the video evidence closely it suggests that some kind of illusion was being generated to trick observers of the existence of a 767 aircraft. It is possible that a solid object was cloaked inside the illusion. John Lear explains just how impossible the speed was, which is a piece of glaring evidence that is not going to go away. Source and further evidence; http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.php?ref=177&part=1&gen=2

NOTE: SINCE CIRCULATING THIS VIDEO A POSSIBLE EXPLANATION FOR THE DIFFERENCE IN THE TWO FLIGHT PATHS (DANIEL R. BOWER & RADES) HAS BEEN SUGGESTED. THE RADES RADAR SYSTEM WAS MUCH FURTHER AWAY FROM THE TOWERS, THE DISTANCE IS SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO CREATE A FIXED SYSTEM ERROR IN THE RADAR READINGS. THIS COULD ACCOUNT FOR WHY THE RADES PATH SEEMS OVER 1000 FEET OUT OF POSITION. HOWEVER, ALL THE OTHER OBSERVATIONS IN THIS FILM ARE STILL UNEXPLAINED. I.E. THE SPEED AND IMPACT DYNAMICS ARE BOTH IMPOSSIBLE, THEREFORE WE WERE NOT SEEING A PLANE IN ANY OF THE VIDEOS. MY CURRENT THINKING ON THIS IS THERE MAY HAVE BEEN A SOLID OBJECT, PROBABLY A SMALL MISSILE AT THE CENTRE OF THE "ILLUSION", WITH AN IMAGE OF A BOEING 767 BEING PROJECTED AROUND IT. THE SPEED RECORDED IS CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL TYPES OF MISSILE IN USE IN 2001, ONE BEING THE TOMAHAWK MISSILE. THE SIZE, SPEED AND RANGE OF THE TOMAHAWK ALL MATCH THE OBSERVED CIRCUMSTANCES, THEY CAN BE LAUNCHED FROM A SUBMARINE. THE SPEED IS DEFINITELY NOT CONSISTENT WITH A BOEING 767. AN ENERGY WEAPON MAY HAVE BEEN USED TO CREATED THE "WING HOLES" SHORTLY AFTER IMPACT AS WAS SEEN IN THE FIRST TOWER IMPACT. Source and further video evidence; http://www.richplanet.net/911.php

We can fully appreciate and understand that when something as big and as well known as this - that has since led us into wars and changed our world forever - that you have to learn how to allow yourself to stop bullshitting yourself and no matter how difficult that may be for you. Stop deceiving yourself and others in the process; have your children look up to you knowing that all you seek is the truth, nothing more, nothing less. Eyeswideshut!