Disciplinary measure & rights to appeal

Disciplinary measure

 

Should you be caught breaking our site rules/policies you will receive a private email message explaining what you are doing wrong and will be asked to stop doing it.

 

If you continue violating policy we will post a comment on your "My Page" to explain the problem again.

 

If after a 3rd failure to comply with the site rules/polices you will be banned from the site.

 

Rights to Appeal

 

You must submit an email to Site ADMINS that clearly states you are requesting a reconsideration.  It should also explain why you think the Admin's decision was wrong and include any new information that you would like Admins to consider.  Admins will discuss your reconsideration request at their next meeting.  All information obtained on your appeal will be re-examined and Admins will vote to affirm, modify, or reverse its previous decision.  You will be notified once a decision has been made.  You have now exercised your Right to Appeal and this decision is final. 

Views: 88

Comments are closed for this blog post

Comment by Nikki on March 16, 2011 at 11:47pm
Looks good to me.
Comment by Nikki on March 14, 2011 at 6:00pm
I think with Jen's modification it's good to go.  Can we agree on this?
Comment by Nikki on March 14, 2011 at 4:40pm
As Jen pointed out the public warning many not work due to the member's ability to block comments.  Can we come up with an alternative or leave as is since most members don't block comments?
Comment by Nikki on January 31, 2011 at 12:38am
I agree Tara, he's a strange bird.  He has a Jekyll and Hyde personality, sweet one minute and rude the next.  He has rubbed members here the wrong way.
Comment by truth on January 31, 2011 at 12:36am
I gave him warning he continued rant and was banned for four hours. Next shift gets him :)
Comment by Tara on January 31, 2011 at 12:34am

Speaking of disclipinary actions that need to be taken, the member Xhacked needs to be warned about his disrespectful and rude behavior in the chatroom and in his posts. Something is not right with him. I'm very suspicious of his purpose for being on the site. He definetely is trying to stir up the pot....thankfully most members are just ignoring him and he usually just goes away but he's up to something.

What do you all think?

Comment by Nikki on January 14, 2011 at 12:22pm
Rights to Appeal.  You must submit an email to Site Admins that clearly states you are requesting a reconsideration.  It should also explain why you think admins decision was wrong and include any new information that you would like admins to consider.  Admins will discuss your reconsideration request at their next meeting.  All information obtained on your appeal will be reexamined and admins will vote to affirm, modify, or reverse its previous decision.  You will be notified once a decision has been made.  You have now exercised your Right to Appeal and this decision is final.
Comment by Tara on January 14, 2011 at 11:38am

1st warning) Using the site admin, send private message to member. Standard message: "It has been brought to our attention that you have broken a rule on the site. (explanation of the rule/rules broken). Please do not let this happen again. Thank you."

2nd warning) Using the site admin, send a public message to the members comment box. Standard message: "It has been brought to our attention once again that you have broken a rule on the site. (explanation of the rule/rules broken). Please do not let this happen again or we will have no other choice but to ban you. Thank you."

3rd warning) Bye Bye......

Comment by truth on November 12, 2010 at 1:47am
Looks good guys much thanks!
Comment by Tara on November 11, 2010 at 11:04am
Excellent! Let's make it happen capn'

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

James Roberts posted a status
45 minutes ago
James Roberts posted a status
59 minutes ago
James Roberts posted a status
1 hour ago
Diana commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

Should Not Run

"JR, You're right, she's already the Queen per CNN.  lol"
1 hour ago
Phyllis Maka's 2 blog posts were featured
1 hour ago
James Roberts commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

Should Not Run

""91% of those polled said Hillary should not run, because she already won last time! We owe…"
1 hour ago
James Roberts favorited Diana's photo
1 hour ago
Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
2 hours ago
Charles Cox favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post Facts on Fraud: the Gold Confiscation Bail-Out in FDR's Own Words
2 hours ago
Charles Cox favorited cheeki kea's photo
2 hours ago
Diana replied to Diana's discussion Baltimore Wants To Sue Gun Makers Over Gang Violence
"They could also prosecute criminals, but that isn't how a liberal city works. "
2 hours ago
Diana favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post The British Nazi Communists(LIZARDS-Military Industrial Complex) Takeover of America(humanity)
2 hours ago
Diana posted photos
3 hours ago
Diana's 2 discussions were featured
3 hours ago
Diana posted discussions
3 hours ago
Diana commented on James Roberts's blog post Queen sacks Prince Andrew, No More Official Public Appearnces, Strips Him of £249,000 "Salary" Over Epstein
3 hours ago
Diana favorited James Roberts's blog post Queen sacks Prince Andrew, No More Official Public Appearnces, Strips Him of £249,000 "Salary" Over Epstein
3 hours ago
James Roberts's blog post was featured

Queen Sacks Prince Andrew, No More Official Public Appearnces, Strips Him of £249,000 "Salary" Over Epstein

Will wonders never cease? Must have damaged the public image of the royal family more than the…See More
3 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

shop.donaldjtrump.com

"Phil Brown 8 months ago Adam Schiff. Fitting description. likes: 53"
3 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Diana's photo
3 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted