I first wrote about the "cover-up" problems in North Wales in April 2012, I have updated a few points:
In a 1990 interview for The Independent on Sunday, Lyn Barber asked him about rumours that he liked "little girls". Savile's reply was that, as he worked in the pop music business, "...the young girls in question don't gather round me because of me – it's because I know the people they love, the stars... I am of no interest to them."[1]
In April 2000, in a documentary by Louis Theroux, When Louis Met Jimmy Savile, Savile acknowledged "salacious tabloid people" had raised rumours about whether he was a paedophile, and said, "I know I'm not."[2]
In 2007, Savile was interviewed by police over allegation of indecent assault in the 1970s at the now-closed Duncroft Approved School for Girls near Staines, Surrey, where he was a regular visitor. Though yet again the CPS, advised there was insufficient evidence to take any further action.[3]
Chris Moyles glowing post death tribute to the paedophile Sir Jimmy Savile OBE
In March 2008, Savile started legal proceedings against The Sun newspaper which had linked him in several articles to child abuse at the Jersey children's home Haut de la Garenne.[4] Savile denied visiting Haut de la Garenne, then had to later admitted that he had following the publication of a photograph showing him at the home surrounded by children.[5]
In 2009, Savile revealed his stance on paedophilia when publicly defended the convicted paedophile pop star Gary Glitter, saying, “...he just watched a few ‘dodgy films’ and was only vilified because he was a celebrity...’ It were for his own gratification. Whether it was right or wrong is up to him as a person. But they didn’t do anything wrong.”[5]
Gary Glitter!!
Convicted paedophile Jonathan King - Chip off the same Savile block!! 'Though I prefer boys!!!'
Former BBC governor for Wales and chairman of BBC charity Children in Need, Sir Roger Jones, disclosed that more than a decade before Savile’s death he had banned Savile from involvement in the charity, because he felt Savile’s behaviour was “strange” and “suspicious”, and had heard unsubstantiated rumours about his activities.[6]
Even the former Royal Family press secretary Dickie Arbiter, said Savile’s behaviour had raised “concern and suspicion” when Savile acted as an informal marriage counsellor between Prince Charles and Princess Diana in the late 1980s, although no reports had been made.[10]
Apart from Savile being a “Freeman of Scarborough”, he was awarded the The Order of Merit pro Merito Melitensi of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, a knightly merit established in 1920, and in 1990 he was honoured with a Papal knighthood, Knight Commander of the Order of Saint Gregory the Great (KCSG) by Pope John Paul II.
He spent eleven consecutive New Years Eves at Chequers with Thatcher and her family.[8] In 1984, he become a member of the Athenaeum Club, a gentlemen's club in London’s Pall Mall after being proposed by Cardinal Basil Hume.[9] He regularly met Prince Charles through mutual charity interests, and Charles reportedly sent him gifts on his 80th birthday and a note reading: “Nobody will ever know what you have done for this country Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that.”[8]
Savile claimed he had had many sexual relations with women, and that “...there have been trains and, with apologies to the hit parade, boats and planes; I am a member of the 40,000 ft club, and bushes and fields, corridors, doorways, floors, chairs, slag heaps, desks and probably everything except the celebrated chandelier and ironing board.”[11]
Then there's the problem with the accusations made by Steve Messham accusing Lord McAlpine as being among his abusers. That made three people pointing the finger of blame at McAlpine, one has since died and the other either in hiding or disappeared some other way?
Leaving Messham all alone, as who else is rushing to his aid? As now oddly enough he has changed his mind, his saying he must have made a mistake and it was not now McAlpine, but someone else!! Come of it, no one mistakes someone's identity when they have done something like that to you. Perhaps Messham's comments are a clue why his done this sudden U-turn and that has led to the resignation of the BBCs Director General, George Enwhistle.
McAlpine is saying the extact same thing Kenneth Clarke and Jimmy Savile said, in the case of Saville, the Sun photo came out with him at the kid’s home in Jersey. McAlpine goes on to say; The facts are, however, that I have been to Wrexham only once. I visited the local Constituency Conservative Association in my capacity as Deputy Chairman. I was accompanied on this trip, at all times, by Stuart Newman, a Central Office Agent. We visited Mary Bell, a distant relative of mine and close friend of Stuart Newman. We did not stay the night in Wrexham. I have never been to the children’s home in Wrexham, nor have I ever visited any children’s home, reform school or any other institution of a similar nature. I have never stayed in a hotel in or near Wrexham, I did not own a Rolls Royce, have never had a “Gold card” or “Harrods card” and never wear aftershave, all of which have been alleged. I did not sexually abuse Mr Messham or any other residents of the children’s home in Wrexham. Stuart Newman is now dead but my solicitors are endeavouring to locate a senior secretary who worked at Central Office at the time to see if she can remember the precise date I visited that Association. [It's almost as if he is trying to describe someone more like Jimmy Savile in the Rolls Royce], - and so what if his solicitor comes up with a date, most solicitors are bent. It's Messham's change of story that is most suspect, McAlpine has had to come out with something, and as you've said, for Messam to have been mistaken, how it that possible?
Ben Fellows
Though as I say, Ken Clarke has done the very same thing when actor Ben Fellows accused of grabbing hold of his manhood and whilst in the offices of the BBC. This institutionalised child abuse has been going on for decades.
Ken Clarke QC
It continues to this very day and yet they are trying to look at this as if it’s something from the dark-ages of the 70s-80s era!! We as a collective are bringing to the world’s attention and that’s why they hate the internet and want to control it, and that’s why we must keep chip, chip, chipping away and one day these bastards will fall like house of cards!!
THIS TWO-PART FILM tells the story of an extraordinary child abuse case in North Wales. A retired police detective claims that he was introduced to a child sex abuse ring by a fellow freemason. The retired police officer is jailed but he claims that he doesn't know the identity of the mason who invited him into the ring. This second mason has never been caught. The police didn't investigate until Rebecca, Britain's first investigative website, began asking some awkward questions.
BROTHERS IN THE SHADOWS - PART 2
This is a trailer of the second REBECCA TELEVISION programme. The programme tells the story of how Britain's biggest child abuse inquiry prevented an important witness from giving evidence.
The magazine Rebecca, ran from 1973 to 1982 - Then in 2010 setup Rebecca Television, describing itself as “Britain's first investigative website”, Rebecca will combine web TV programmes with long investigative articles. http://www.rebeccatelevision.com/articles/frostTV01
The first TV programme, about a Freemason who allegedly got away with abusing a young girl, is called “Brothers in the Shadows”. A two-minute trailer was posted on YouTube last night.
The editor of Rebecca is Paddy French, who was a current affairs producer with the ITV Wales programme Wales This Week until he left at the end of 2008. He said: “My career started with Rebecca, and now that I’m semi-retired I’d like to end it with the internet version. This time around Rebecca will try and forge something new – a blend of the best of both TV and print.”
The first edition also features an investigation into what Rebecca claims is the failure of the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal to properly investigate the influence of Freemasonry.
There is also as an investigation into an anti-corruption detective who was allegedly hounded out of his job with a Welsh police force.
The original magazine’s reputation was made when it started a run of stories about corruption in local government which led to the creation of the magazine’s Corruption Supplement. In the mid-1970s 14 councillors and businessmen named in its pages were jailed for corruption.
Rebecca also carried out a four-year investigation into the business career of former Prime Minister James Callaghan. Callaghan was a Cardiff MP and Rebecca criticised his links with the Welsh millionaire businessman Sir Julian Hodge.
In the 1980s freemasonry came under fire from journalists. REBECCA was one of the first with an investigation in 1981.
In the very first session the barrister for one of the groups of former residents of care homes made an application about Masonry. The barrister, Nick Booth, asked that “...the Tribunal should keep a register of the Masonic membership amongst its staff, the members, its representatives and witnesses who appear before it”. He explained: “The duty of loyalty to a brother mason and his duty of impartiality if he is involved in the administration of justice is not a new one and it’s one that’s very much in the public eye, particularly at the moment.”
“The Tribunal will be aware of the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee which is investigating the issue,” he added. "Sir, I stress, if I have not stressed it before, that I am not making any suggestion of disreputable conduct, merely to put the matter beyond the reach of any possible public comment which might undermine the public confidence in the Inquiry.”
Sir Ronald Waterhouse, the retired High Court judge who chaired the Tribunal, felt that the application was a slur on the integrity of the Tribunal’s staff.
The chairman of the Tribunal, Sir Ronald Waterhouse, and the two other members of the Tribunal, retired for a brief adjournment.
“It will not surprise you that the application is refused,” said Sir Ronald on their return.
“As far as the staff are concerned,” Sir Ronald said, “in so far as the application carries any reflection upon the integrity of the staff of the Tribunal it’s repudiated, wholly unwarranted; there is no evidence whatsoever to support any suggestion that they have not acted with complete integrity…”
“The members of the Tribunal are in this position: the Tribunal was set up by Parliament and the members of it were appointed by the Secretary of State for Wales and the [criticism of the composition] should be addressed through the proper channels.”
Gerard Elias QC. The leading counsel to the Tribunal kept silent throughout the discussion about a register of freemasons. He himself is a freemason …
He said that the Tribunal’s own Counsel, Gerard Elias QC, was appointed by the Attorney General.
“Any criticism … should be addressed through the usual Parliamentary channels,” he suggested.
Gerard Elias said nothing during Booth’s application and he remained silent after Sir Ronald had made the Tribunal’s ruling.
Yet both Sir Ronald and Gerard Elias knew something that journalists reporting the Tribunal would have wanted to know.
Gerard Elias is a mason. He’s a member of perhaps the most powerful masonic lodge in Wales, Dinas Llandaf. The lodge, which meets in Cardiff, is made up mainly of legal professionals and members of the Conservative party, although there are members from other political groups.
See the article Brothers in Silk for an examination of the influence of this lodge and the story of the barrister who claims that his refusal to join the lodge was the reason why he was never made a QC.
Another member of the lodge, Gwilym Jones, was the Tory MP for Cardiff North between 1983 and 1997. He was minister of state at the Welsh Office when the Tribunal was set up.
REBECCA has a source who was close to the heart of the Tribunal. This source says Sir Ronald was aware of Elias’ masonic membership. Yet he too kept silent about the fact that the Tribunal’s own Counsel was a mason.
What happened at the Tribunal was in contrast to proceedings at the beginning of Gordon Anglesea’s libel case in London less than three years earlier.
Gordon Anglesea was a retired North Wales Police superintendent who was accused by journalists of abusing young boys at a children’s home in North Wales. He won a libel action and accepted £375,000 in damages.
The judge was Sir Maurice Drake. He told the court that he was a member of an organisation to which Gordon Anglesea also belonged. He did not mention freemasonry but all of the legal teams on both sides knew which organisation he was referring to.
There were no objections and no one ever questioned the way he handled the case.
Dinas Llandaf is one of the 174 lodges in the South Wales Province. South Wales is one of the more open of the 47 provinces in England and Wales.
Every year it gives copies of its annual yearbook to libraries and to any journalist who asks for one. The yearbooks list the officers of each lodge and the current issue – 2009-2010– gives considerable detail about Dinas Llandaf.
A yearbook of the North Wales Province. The province does not like to see its yearbooks widely distributed.
For example, it shows all the officers of the lodge and those members who have reached the highest position – master of the lodge. Gerard Elias is shown as having been master in 1994.
However, the North Wales Province is a completely closed book. It refuses to give out copies of its yearbook and these come into the public domain only occasionally.
For the directory of freemasons in Apron Strings, for example, REBECCA had to make do with one for 1995-96.
In 1995 a copy of the same yearbook came into the hands of Mark Brittain who was, at the time, Editor of the North Wales Weekly News. He quickly spotted a lodge called Custodes Pacis which was formed in 1983.
Mark Brittain. He was the Editor of the North Wales Weekly News when he discovered the existence of the police lodge Custodes Pacis.
He was told many members of Custodes Pacis – it’s Latin for Keepers of the Peace – were serving or retired police officers. Police lodges are not uncommon with the best known being London’s Manor of St James which at one point contained many senior officers of the Metropolitan Police.
In 1995 Brittain wrote to the recently appointed Chief Constable of North Wales, Michael Argent, and asked him for an interview. He asked if the new chief was aware of the lodge. Argent wrote back to agree to an interview but told the journalist he could find no evidence of a police lodge.
When Brittain met Argent he told him he had evidence of the lodge’s existence and, after the meeting, sent him the lodge entry from the 1995-96 yearbook.
Argent wrote back in April. He now admitted that the lodge list “did indeed contain names known to me and my colleagues although in each case they were retired from the force – in some instances for quite a considerable period.”
Brittain wrote back to ask if he was sure that there were no serving officers. In May 1995 Argent replied and said that further enquiries had been undertaken.
“Mark Brittain seemed to know more about masonic influence in North Wales Police than the chief constable did.”
“I am reliably informed that whilst, as I have suggested to you in my earlier letter, it consists mainly of retired police officers – certainly up to superintendent level – there are only four currently serving officers. Three are identified as constables and the fourth is either a constable or at most a sergeant.”
Brittain says Michael Argent’s story changed three times during this correspondence.
The man who was chief constable when Custodes Pacis was set up in 1983 was David Owen. When he gave evidence to the Tribunal, he did not mention the existence of the lodge…
We wrote to David Owen to ask him why he didn’t tell the Tribunal about the lodge. He rang back to say he didn’t want to answer questions.
In September 1997, during the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal hearings, Brittain wrote to the North Wales police authority, which is responsible for the non-policing aspects of the force.
The then clerk to the authority, Leon Gibson, wrote back to say that the information about the membership of Custodes Pacis had come from an unnamed lodge member.
Gibson added that if the Chief Constable “remembers correctly, there were five, one sergeant and four constables.”
Andrew Moran, the barrister who spoke for the North Wales Police. He claimed that the force was a mason-free zone…
The barrister who represented North Wales Police at the Tribunal was Andrew Moran, QC. In his opening address, he made it clear that the force felt that masonry was an irrelevance.
He listed many of the senior policemen who had played a role in the child abuse investigations and said, “I am instructed to add, irrelevant though it should be, that none … is a Freemason.”
He added: “Where then, please, we ask is the masonic influence? Freemason[s] at the top of the North Wales Police? There are none … Mason-free zone, we would say.”
In this opening address, he did an unusual thing. He said none of these people “is” a freemason and did not add the usual rider “or has been” when dealing with masonic membership.
He therefore left open the question of whether any of these senior officers had ever been masons.
Sir Ronald Waterhouse: the difference between “is” and “had been”…
The Report of the Tribunal reported this statement with slightly different wording; “at the outset of the Inquiry Counsel for the North Wales Police stated, on the instructions of the Chief Constable, that none of the current or former senior officers from Assistant Chief Constable upwards during the period under review had been a freemason and that the same was true of the relevant Detective Chief Superintendents and Detective Superintendent Ackerley.”
Ackerley was the Superintendent who headed the major police inquiry into child abuse between 1991 and 1993.
REBECCA wrote to Sir Ronald Waterhouse about how the word “is” had changed into “had been.” He never replied.
During the public hearings of the Tribunal freemasonry was little discussed, as its report makes clear: “Although this question was quite widely discussed in the press before the Tribunal’s hearings began very few questions were asked about it during our inquiry and most of them were put by the Chairman of the Tribunal to give appropriate witnesses an opportunity to affirm or deny any connection with freemasonry.”
REBECCA sent a list of all the male barristers who appeared before the Tribunal to the United Grand Lodge of England and asked how many of them were freemasons.
How many of the barristers who took part in the Tribunal were or had been masons? REBECCA asked masonic HQ in London but a spokesman said he was unable to answer the question.
REBECCA also asked if the police assessor to the Tribunal, Sir Ronald Hadfield, and the retired police officers who made up the Tribunal’s witness interviewing team were masons.
A spokesman replied: “I’m afraid I am unable to give you the information you require. We would only do so if you were an official body making that request.”
When the Tribunal reported in 2000, its verdict was clear: “Freemasonry had no impact on any of the police investigations and was not relevant to any other issue arising from our terms of reference.”
The most important known mason who appeared before the Tribunal was the retired Superintendent Gordon Anglesea who won a libel action against journalists who wrongly accused him of abusing children.
“Anglesea was questioned also about his connection with Freemasonry,” said the Tribunal Report, “because of an underlying suggestion that there had been a ‘cover-up’ in his case. He disclosed that he had become a full member of Berwyn Lodge in Wrexham, in 1982, after being a probationer in a lodge at Colwyn Bay from about 1976.”
“He had then transferred to a new Wrexham lodge, Pegasus lodge, in 1984 after a gap from April to September, because it offered an opportunity for swifter advance in freemasonry.”
The Tribunal Report then says he remained a member of the Pegasus Lodge despite a directive from the Chief Constable of the North Wales Police, David Owen, in September 1984.
“We must be seen to be even-handed in the discharge of our office and my policy will be to say that if you have considered joining the Masons, think carefully about how that application might interfere with your primary duty.” Chief Constable David Owen
This directive stated: “We must be seen to be even-handed in the discharge of our office and my policy will be to say that if you have considered joining the Masons, think carefully about how that application might interfere with your primary duty.”
“To those who are Masons I would say that you should consider carefully how right it is to continue such membership. In the open society in which we live that openness must be seen by all and must not be an openness partially [clouded] by a secrecy where people could question true motivation.”
During cross-examination of Anglesea at the Tribunal, Tim King QC, representing former residents of children’s homes, asked him if Owen’s directive had upset or concerned him.
“Not whatsoever, sir,” replied Anglesea, “I read that order two or three times and it did not – I felt it did not affect my particular position.”
In the 1980s freemasonry came under fire from journalists. REBECCA was one of the first with an investigation in 1981.
1984 was a watershed year for public scrutiny of masonry. That year saw the publication of Stephen Knight’s The Brotherhood which followed other press investigations such the 1981 REBECCA article Darkness Visible.
The same year Metropolitan Commissioner Sir Kenneth Newman and Albert Laugharne, an assistant commissioner, published “The Principles of Policing” which made it clear that membership of freemasonry left officers open to suspicion.
“Thus an officer must pay the most careful regard to the impression which others are likely to gain of his membership, as well as to what he actually does, however inhibiting he may find this when arranging his own private life.”
David Owen’s response to these developments was to call a conference of superintendents which decided to issue the directive.
Lord Kenyon was the Grand Master of the North Wales Province of Freemasonry in the 1980s. He was also a member of the North Wales Police Authority.
Within a month of Owen circulating it, the Provincial Grand Master of North Wales, Lord Kenyon, asked to meet with him. The two men knew each other well: Kenyon was also a member of the police authority.
The meeting took place at Wrexham police station. Lord Kenyon was accompanied by the secretary of the province, Leonard Ellis.
Solicitors acting for the masons wrote to the Tribunal in an attempt to get this anecdote removed on the grounds that it was irrelevant to the Tribunal’s work.
The Tribunal rejected the attempt and its report described what happened when the Provincial Grand Master came face to face with the Chief Constable.
David Owen told the Grand Master that he had no intention of withdrawing his directive about freemasonry…
“At this meeting Lord Kenyon argued that the directive was totally misguided and asked that it should be withdrawn and he mentioned that a police officer (unidentified but not Anglesea) had been about to take the chair in a North Wales lodge but had declined to do so because of this directive.”
“Owen’s evidence was that he told Lord Kenyon that he had no intention of withdrawing the directive. In response, Lord Kenyon argued that the Chief Constable knew nothing at all about freemasonry and suggested it would be appropriate for him to join a lodge, such as the one at Denbigh, outside any area of his usual working activity, but this invitation was declined.”
David Owen wasn’t the first chief constable Lord Kenyon had dealt with. Four years earlier the grand master welcomed Sir Walter Stansfield back to North Wales after he retired as Derbyshire’s chief constable and brought his police career to a close.
Sir Walter had been chief constable of the Denbigh force before the reorganisation which led to the creation of the North Wales Police. He was deputy chief constable of North Wales in 1967 when he was appointed Derbyshire’s chief constable.
When he left North Wales to take up the Derbyshire post, he didn’t sever his links with North Wales. He joined a new masonic lodge, Dyfrdwy, which met at Ruabon, becoming its master a year later, in 1968.
In 1981 REBECCA asked Sir Walter Stansfield why he had chosen to join a North Wales lodge after he left North Wales Police. Had he been a member of a lodge in another part of the country?
Sir Walter didn’t take kindly to being questioned on the subject. He said: “Who do you think you’re talking to?” He then denied being Sir Walter Stansfield even though the telephone number he was speaking on was listed in his name.
Sir Walter didn’t take kindly to being questioned on the subject. He said: “Who do you think you’re talking to?”
Sir Walter also makes a cameo appearance in Martin Short’s book about freemasonry, Inside The Brotherhood. After Sir Walter left Derbyshire, the English force was rocked by the Alf Parrish scandal.
Parrish was appointed chief constable in 1981 but soon squandered police funds for his own comfort. He was driven out of office by which time it was discovered that he was a mason as were many of the police authority members who appointed him.
The key masons belonged to the oldest lodge in Derbyshire, Tryian. A provincial yearbook obtained by Labour councillors in the mid-1980s revealed that another member of the lodge was Sir Walter Stansfield…
Lord Kenyon told a Grand Lodge meeting that masons have nothing to hide “but we object to having our affairs investigated by outsiders.”
Back in 1981, North Wales Provincial Grand Master Lord Kenyon responded to increasing media attention, including REBECCA coverage, by making a statement to masons in the province.
“… we have nothing to hide and certainly nothing to be ashamed of, but we object to having our affairs investigated by outsiders.”
“We would be able to answer many of the questions likely to be asked, if not all of them, but we have found that silence is the best policy: comment or correction only breeds further inquiry and leads to the publicity we try to avoid.”
Sir Ronald Waterhouse said there was no evidence that Lord Kenyon had done anything to help Gordon Anglesea.
The child abuse Tribunal’s report also dismissed any suggestion that Lord Kenyon had tried to promote the career of Gordon Anglesea.
The Report concluded that “there is no evidence that Lord Kenyon intervened at any time in any way on behalf of Anglesea.”
The Tribunal did consider a comment made by Councillor Malcolm King, who was also a former chairman of the North Wales Police Authority, that “there was speculation (he believed) that Lord Kenyon had asked for promotion for Gordon Anglesea.”
“This was said by Councillor King to have been based on a conversation overheard at a police function; and that the speculation was that Lord Kenyon had advocated Anglesea’s promotion ‘for the purpose of covering up the fact that his son had been involved in child abuse activities’.”
Councillor Malcolm King: he was the source of the rumour that Lord Kenyon had expressed surprise that Gordon Anglesea had not been promoted…
This was alleged to have related to an incident in August 1979 when Lord Kenyon’s son, Tom, reported the theft of articles by a former Bryn Estyn resident while the two men were staying at a flat in Wrexham. The young man he accused of theft was arrested and later given three months detention.
However, during the course of the investigation police discovered a series of indecent photographs in the flat which was owned by a man called Gary Cooke.
Cooke was later gaoled for five years on two counts of buggery, one of indecent assault and one of taking an indecent photograph.
Cooke claimed that, after he was arrested and charged, Tom Kenyon came over and apologised to him for what had happened and handed him a letter.
He added that if Cooke agreed “not to say anything” he would have a word with his father to improve Cooke’s chances in court.
Lost in Care, the report of the Tribunal published in 2000, was damning about this story: “We have received no evidence whatsoever in support of this allegation and it appears to have been merely a malicious rumour.”
Cooke says he gave this letter to the police. The officers who dealt with the case say they received no such letter.
Cooke believed that Tom Kenyon’s intervention shortened his sentence.
However, when Superintendent Ackerley was carrying out his investigation into this case, he discovered that the prosecution file could not be found.
The Tribunal’s investigators discovered that there was no evidence Cooke had been shown any favour: he served a full third of his sentence. In any case, the Report added, Lord Kenyon had no influence with the parole board.
The Tribunal’s Report conclusion was damning: “We have received no evidence whatsoever in support of this allegation and it appears to have been merely a malicious rumour.”
Councillor King was actually combining two separate rumours here: the first that Lord Kenyon had spoken up for Anglesea at a police function, the second that it was somehow related to favours Anglesea was alleged to have done for his son.
It was at a function at police headquarters in Colwyn Bay that a Police Federation rep heard Lord Kenyon talking about Gordon Anglesea… Photo: Barry Davies
The Tribunal should have known that the first rumour, that Lord Kenyon had spoken up for Anglesea, had rather more substance. The source of the anecdote was Harry Templeton, a former constable and once the secretary of the Police Federation branch in North Wales Police.
The reason the Tribunal should have known about it was that two members of its own Witness Interviewing Team, made up of retired police officers who were not from North Wales, went to talk to Templeton.
Templeton told them he had been to a function at the senior officers’ dining room at Police Headquarters in Colwyn Bay and was sitting opposite Lord Kenyon who was present as a magistrate member of the Police Authority.
Templeton told the Tribunal team that Lord Kenyon had said that he was surprised Gordon Anglesea, then a chief inspector, had not been promoted to Superintendent and that he would see to it that he was promoted before he retired.
There is a mystery about why Templeton’s evidence was never heard by the Tribunal. Its own witness interviewing team actually went to see the retired policeman …
Templeton told them he’d made a signed affidavit about the incident for a national newspaper. Templeton also told the Tribunal team there was another witness to the remark, Peter Williams, the then chairman of the Police Federation branch.
Templeton never said anything about Lord Kenyon’s advocating a promotion for Gordon Anglesea having anything to do with Tom Kenyon’s case. This suggestion, he says, must have come from somewhere else.
When REBECCA sent Templeton details of the Tribunal’s findings in relation to this anecdote, he was shocked. He says that the two retired Tribunal detectives had not taken a signed statement from him and he now feels there is a question mark about what they did with the information he gave them.
REBECCA also spoke to Peter Williams who said that the Tribunal never came to see him. He confirmed that he was at the function with Harry Templeton in their official roles as Police Federation representatives.
He recalls that Lord Kenyon expressed his surprise that Gordon Anglesea had not been promoted. He does not remember him saying that he would see that it took place before he retired. •R•
This is a great film made over 60 years ago that cost the life of its director Paul Riche, a pseudonym of Jean Mamy, who was shot dead at the fortress of Montrouge on 29th March 1949 for what the Masonic courts termed; “Collaboration with the enemy”. At the beginning of the film we see a young upright politician addressing the French parliament, he rips apart the blue pill Capitalist of the right and the red pill Communists on the left accusing them as being as deceitfully equal in their suppression of the “people”.
Occult Forces
His speech causes uproar among the Politicians, - and in a close-up sequence we can see two elder politicians discussing; “What “lodge” does he belong to?” - The other informs him; “He’s not one of us”. “Ah no wonder he’s so outspoken, I think he needs to be taken into the fold”. – The politician he has just told this to, then get’s up from his row and goes three or four rows down and addresses a much elder chap; “Your Worshipful Master”, and translates what his “brother” had just suggested. The Worshipful Master raises the point that’s exactly what he was thinking and they decide to “initiate” him into the world of Freemasonry as from then on.
And that’s the problem today. I’m certainly not suggesting the Jews are in on this alone, far from it, they never have been alone, divide and rule is the Illuminati way, always has been, likely always will be, unless we can bring about “real change”, and ban members of secret societies from also being able to serve in our governments and their related bodies.
The film then recounts his initiation into the “Brotherhood”, as he is persuaded to re-launch his career, thus learns of their inner secrets - and how the Freemasons were conspiring with the Jews and the Anglo-American nations to goad France into a war against Germany.
Many Freemason's such as Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman, wear these kinds of rings whilst in public - why is it they feel this need 'to hide' their "beliefs?"
It denounces Freemasonry and reveals how influential the Freemason’s are in political world, how corrupt parliamentarianism really is, and what it sees as the Jews part of Vichy's drive against them, and is determine to prove a Masonic plot behind the rise and escalation of WWII.
The Vichy Government, or simply termed Vichy, collaborated with the Axis powers from July 1940 to August 1944, during the WWI. It officially called itself the French State (État Français) and was headed by Marshal Philippe Pétain, who proclaimed the government following the military defeat of France by Germany.
As was the director Robert Muzard charged with the same as Paul Riche, though it appears not to death as many articles claim, though I could be wrong, - when on the 25th November 1945 he was condemned to 3 years in prison. The films writer Marquès-Rivière was also condemned, though in his absence, as he had gone into self-imposed exile, - the penalty was; “Death and degradation”.
It's interesting to note the place the Fortress of Montrouge, where they mudered Paul Riche with a bullet to the head, in the book Colleges of Controversy; page 7; It reads; “...the Jesuit “novice house” at Montrouge was turned into a Fortress where 50,000 of the Orders members set themselves to small arms drill and artillery training”. Circa 1814’s
In the United Kingdom, back in 1929 the New Welcome Masonic Lodge No. 5139, opened 'inside' the Palace of Westminster, - alongside the other Masonic lodges for members of the other political parties. At its founding, membership was limited to Labour Party Members of Parliament only, but its scope has since broadened.
The Houses of Parliament
The lodge is alleged to have influenced the outcome of the 1935 Parliamentary leadership elections and was created at the suggestion of the then Prince of Wales, afterwards King Edward VIII, who was concerned by the antagonism between Freemasonry and the British left, and the fact that a number of Labour MPs were blackballed when applying to join Masonic lodges.
The New Welcome Lodge was intended to form a link between Freemasonry and the new governing party, and was open to Labour MPs and for employees of trade unions and the Labour party; its members included Labour’s deputy leader Arthur Greenwood, and no doubt Unison’s Trade union joint boss Tony Woodley [who oddly ripped up copies of The Sun newspaper, - yet asked; “Where’s the Sky’s News camera”, when confronted by a pack of reporters, as it seems he wanted to address them “only" or to give them what appeared to be the "exclusive".
Sky News tore the ass out of it by playing the clip of him saying it time and again and days after the event, ...among other trade union members.
At the very least we should be adopting the same regulations as what the Portuguese PM has called for in January 2012, a “Public Register” of members of these such societies have to declare if they members of a “secret society” and the name of the club or lodge.
Portuguese Prime Minister Pedro Passos Coelho, gave the Ministry of Internal Administration (equivalent to MSW) guidelines for the obligations of persons holding high positions in government to disclose whether they
Yet another police "Cover-Up" will be exposed and fully explained on the 12-12-12
To be released on the 12-12-12 - A Madness Shared by Two, is not only the true untold story about the lives of Sabina and Ursula Eriksson, alongside the murder of Glenn Hollinshead, based on a critique re-examination of the BBC’s Madness in the Fast Lane documentary that had 7 million viewers [with a conservative estimate of around a further 15 million people having since watched this film via the internet and on websites such as YouTube],glued to their TV screens watching the twin sisters propelling themselves into the fast lane of the oncoming traffic on the UK’s-M6 motorway, as Ursula manages to throw herself under the wheels of a 40ft articulated lorry travelling at 60mph, that seems to swallow her up and spit her lifeless looking body back out of its rear end. It is also the result of a thorough investigation into what might have really happened on those fateful days that led up to this tragic slaying of an innocent man. We challenge the “Official Storyline” and expose what really occurred just hours before M6 dash, for it is here for the first time we expose the Eriksson sisters were “arrested” under the Mental Health Act, though this vital caught on film evidence was edited out of the original BBC films. This will come as a great surprise to many people who questioned; ‘...how was it possible Sabina could have been released from hospital after only five hours’ following their ‘suicide attempt’ on the M6? We also reveal that the coroner’s report shows that the injuries inflicted on Glenn, indicate more than one person probably killed him and that Sabina could be totally innocent. Yet this obvious evidence seems to have been brushed under the carpet, or at the very least, it was never challenged. We explain how these twins were very likely embroiled in a major drugs smuggling ring and that they had been under “Obbo” [police observation] prior to the M6 incident, and was probably so for quite some period of time. As a result of our findings, legal action is now being sought and brought against the police and other related authoritative bodies by the Hollinshead family.
Check out the official Event Horizon (1997) trailer starring Laurence Fishburne! Let us know what you think in the comments below.► Watch on Vudu: https://ww...
"The Guillotine" by The Coup from the new album 'Sorry To Bother You,' out nowProduced and Directed by Beau Patrick CoulonDP & Edit - Shawn ButcherAC - Danie...
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network