Six Bogus Things Bloomberg Said About Stop & Frisk

81213bloomberg.jpg
(AP)

Yesterday Mayor Bloomberg, NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly, and Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo gathered at City Hall to excoriate the recent federal decision ruling the NYPD's stop-and-frisk policy... In addition to making a slew of ad hominem attacks against the judge in the case, complaining of bias, and pledging to appeal the decision, Mayor Bloomberg made a string of observations that struck us as misleading, irreverent, or downright false. When a mayoral aide holding the microphone blushed at Mayor Bloomberg's unnecessary disparagement of a reporter who asked a legitimate question, the City blushed with him.

The mayor's comments are in italics.

1) It's The Constitution, Stupid

"Throughout the trial that just concluded, the judge made it clear she was not at all interested in the crime reductions here or how we achieved them. In fact, nowhere in her 195-page decision does she mention the historic cuts in crime or the number of lives that have been saved."

As Michael Powell points out, Judge Scheindlin mentions the importance of a safer New York in the very first sentence of her opinion. But "historic cuts in crime" aren't supposed to factor in to her decision, because it is based on whether or not the policy, as practiced by the NYPD, violates the Constitution. On Page 2 of her opinion, Judge Scheindlin writes,

"I emphasize at the outset, as I have throughout the litigation, that this case is not about the effectiveness of stop and frisk in deterring or combating crime. This Court’s mandate is solely to judge the constitutionality of police behavior, not its effectiveness as a law enforcement tool. Many police practices may be useful for fighting crime—preventive detention or coerced confessions, for example—but because they are unconstitutional they cannot be used, no matter how effective. [Emphasis ours]

2) Stop & Frisk Would Have Been Fine, If It Weren't For Those Meddling "Advocates"

"But one small group of advocates—and one judge—conducted their own investigation. And it was pretty clear from the start which way it would turn out."

To say that the only people who have fundamental problems with the NYPD's use of stop-and-frisk are the "small" group of advocates and plaintiffs who filed this case is obviously false.

Arguably the first person to conduct a major investigation of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practices was Attorney General Eliot Spitzer in 1999 [PDF], a report that the NYPD's top uniformed officer admitted at trial that he didn't bother to read. Judge Scheindlin quotes the report in her ruling:

The investigation was prompted in part by the Attorney General’s finding that despite a decade of falling crime rates, “the climate in many of New York’s minority neighborhoods . . . was one of resentment and distrust of the NYPD.” Many of the complaints involved “lower-level police involvement in the everyday lives of minority residents,” such as stop and frisk encounters.

Sound familiar?

3) NYPD Oversight Will Force Police Officers To Perform "Who's On First?" Routine With Fatal Results

"We have enough problems now. When you're a police officer you have to know what orders to follow. If somebody pulls a gun and you want to get home to your family, you don't have time to say, 'Now wait a second, the Commissioner said one thing, the monitor said another, and the IG said another.' By that time, you're dead. And I'd like to see you go to the funeral and explain to the family why their son or husband or father is not coming home."

http://gothamist.com/2013/08/13/six_outrageous_arguments_made_by_bl...

Views: 224

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

James T. Kirk posted videos
19 minutes ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited Diana's photo
20 minutes ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited Diana's photo
20 minutes ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited Diana's photo
20 minutes ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited Chris of the family Masters's photo
21 minutes ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post The Deep State Shakeup: Change is Beckoning October 13, 2019
26 minutes ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited James T. Kirk's blog post How to Identify and Use Kratom – the Painkilling Plant that Substitutes Opioids
28 minutes ago
James T. Kirk posted a status
"Mark Zuckerberg Tries Stand-Up Comedy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=336OcJjGOMw"
34 minutes ago
Burbia commented on Chris of the family Masters's photo
36 minutes ago
Charles Cox favorited Chris of the family Masters's photo
42 minutes ago
James T. Kirk's 3 blog posts were featured
1 hour ago
Sweettina2's video was featured
1 hour ago
Sweettina2 posted a video

Our Decaying Society

Get Emergency Food Supply with 25 yr shelf-life: http://www.preparewithvincent.com ✅Send Tip on PayPal: https://www.Paypal.Me/VincentJamesRed ✅Subscribe-star...
2 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a photo
2 hours ago
Lori commented on Sweettina2's video
Thumbnail

Epstein Maxwell Royal Family Interview | David Icke

"It defiles their core. I just escaped a slum where a little boy who was being home schooled by drug…"
2 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters favorited Diana's photo
2 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted