The Cost of Welfare Use By Immigrant and Native Households

In September 2015, the Center for Immigration Studies published a landmark study of immigration and welfare use, showing that 51 percent of immigrant-headed households used at least one federal welfare program — cash, food, housing, or medical care — compared to 30 percent of native households. Following similar methodology, this new study examines the dollar cost of that welfare use.

  • The average household headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) costs taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare benefits, which is 41 percent higher than the $4,431 received by the average native household.
  • The average immigrant household consumes 33 percent more cash welfare, 57 percent more food assistance, and 44 percent more Medicaid dollars than the average native household. Housing costs are about the same for both groups.
  • At $8,251, households headed by immigrants from Central America and Mexico have the highest welfare costs of any sending region — 86 percent higher than the costs of native households.
  • Illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 (driven largely by the presence of U.S.-born children), while legal immigrant households cost $6,378.
  • The greater consumption of welfare dollars by immigrants can be explained in large part by their lower level of education and larger number of children compared to natives. Over 24 percent of immigrant households are headed by a high school dropout, compared to just 8 percent of native households. In addition, 13 percent of immigrant households have three or more children, vs. just 6 percent of native households.

Introduction

In September 2015, the Center for Immigration Studies published a landmark study of immigration and welfare use, showing that 51 percent of immigrant-headed households (legal and illegal) use at least one federal welfare program, compared to 30 percent of native households.1 "Welfare" refers to means-tested anti-poverty programs. These include direct cash assistance in the form of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); food aid such as free school lunch, the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) nutrition program, and food stamps; Medicaid; and housing assistance in the form of rent subsidies and public housing. Not included are social insurance programs for which participants must generally pay into the system before drawing benefits, such as Social Security and Medicare.

The earlier CIS study was notable for showing much higher welfare participation rates than previously reported. The reason is that earlier studies measured welfare participation with the Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) of the Current Population Survey. The ASEC is a simple cross-sectional dataset widely used in labor market research. However, the ASEC substantially undercounts welfare participation, in part because it asks respondents to recall their welfare use over a period between three and 15 months before the interview takes place. To address the undercount problem, CIS used a more complex dataset called the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). As the name implies, the Census Bureau specifically designed the SIPP to measure participation in government programs. In addition, the SIPP is a "longitudinal" dataset, meaning it follows the same respondents over time, asking them about their monthly program participation in three different interview "waves" throughout the year. The result is a much more complete picture of welfare participation compared to what the ASEC provides.

Table 1, adapted from that CIS study, quantifies the differences. While the SIPP shows that 51 percent of immigrant-headed households and 30 percent of native-headed households used at least one welfare program in 2012, the comparable figures in the ASEC for immigrant and native households are just 39 percent and 24 percent, respectively.

Read more here:

https://cis.org/Report/Cost-Welfare-Use-Immigrant-and-Native-Househ...

Views: 488

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Diana on October 21, 2018 at 4:51pm

Obamacare alone $750 million in 2015 (But BO promised illegals wouldn't get benefits)

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Central Scrutinizer's blog post was featured
2 minutes ago
Raz Putin's discussion was featured
4 minutes ago
truth favorited Raz Putin's discussion ZeroHedge: "Bill Gates Was Much Closer To Jeffrey Epstein Than He Initially Let On"
5 minutes ago
truth favorited Central Scrutinizer's blog post Project Veritas: CNN Staffer Says Jeff Zucker Has ‘Personal Vendetta’ Against Trump
6 minutes ago
Less Prone favorited Old Denmark's photo
9 minutes ago
Less Prone favorited Old Denmark's photo
10 minutes ago
Less Prone commented on Old Denmark's photo
18 minutes ago
Less Prone replied to Mrs. Tif Morgan's discussion Chelsea Clinton: ‘Women Can Absolutely Have A Beard And A Penis’
"An idiot is an idiot is an idiot. When politics replaced logic. "
24 minutes ago
Charles Cox commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

"Justice Democrat"

"When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything else, you…"
49 minutes ago
Charles Cox favorited Diana's photo
1 hour ago
Less Prone favorited Diana's discussion IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER A JEWISH CONSPIRACY? NO, IT’S A SATANIC CONSPIRACY
1 hour ago
Less Prone favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post Components of Vaccines
1 hour ago
Less Prone favorited Diana's photo
2 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

I Don't Think So

"Building confusion by turning the meaning of words upside down. This is pure George Orwell's…"
2 hours ago
JoeG favorited Diana's photo
2 hours ago
Mrs. Tif Morgan posted discussions
2 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted