Martin Luther King once said, “Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.” This is the pacifist, civil disobedient type of resistance, why is plausible, yet, not persuasive in every aspect of revolution.  Malcolm X once said, “I think there are plenty of good people in America, but there are also plenty of bad people in America and the bad ones are the ones who seem to have all the power and be in these positions to block things that you and I need. Because this is the situation, you and I have to preserve the right to do what is necessary to bring an end to that situation, and it doesn’t mean that I advocate violence, but at the same time I am not against using violence in self-defense. I don’t even call it violence when it’s self-defense, I call it intelligence.” This seems the only way this country operates: aggression. It seems that we have the upper-hand in this matter of defeating the New World Order. Worldwide there is 6.8 billion people. Use race, creed, education level, social status, against these demons because with diversity we have the upper hand. Defeat these theories of aristocracy, separatism, classism, racism, eroticism, etc. The stance you take, whether non-violent or violent, seems impossible to carry on at the moment right. I mean if we organize, and be take a stance of non-violence, civil disobedience, conciliatory stance; they impose martial law. See a video of the G20 conference protest in Pittsburgh for an example. If we practice theories of revolution through force, then they powers that be have the law behind or can finagle it to stick a crime to you. The prison-industrial complex waits for us if we practice violence;in conjunction with the military-industrial complex, as the prisoners make 100% of all military equipment. My point is: we have the number, we the endurance to fight these malignant spirits from hell, from whatever front we choose. Two theories, by two great men, both whom are dead,  both can work. I personally think peaceful protest by a communion of races and genders upsets them the most. It crushes an Adam Weishaupt plan for separation he created in May of 1776(same year of the constitution ironically).  Violence only begets more violence, but there are different fronts for different people. I would like to know your stance on this issue. Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Until next time, this is James X signing off. Peace be to all!