War Against Second Amendment Salvo In War Against The First

One of the fundamental axioms of politics and policy is to never allow a crisis to go to waste. By that, it is meant that, if at all possible, a tragic event should not only be invoked in reference to limit the circumstances surrounding it, but also to taint one's opposition with the ensuing heartache so as to make their own defense against the allegations directed towards them seem callous and insensitive.

An article posted 7/26/18 on the Washington Post website is titled “Why Some Christians Don't Believe In Gun Control: They Think God Handed Down The Second Amendment”. The analysis opens, “We're now at a point when Americans are killed or injured in a mass shooting almost every month...Despite this, resistance to gun control in the United States remains fierce.”

However, blame is not placed on those actually perpetrating such horrific acts of violence. Instead, blame is aimed at those nebulously referred to as “Christian nationalists”.

The author defines Christian nationalism as an ideology that holds to the inseparable bond between Christianity and American civil society. Adherents of the philosophy are accused of believing that America should remain broadly Christian in terms of underlying symbols and policies with the nation's foundational liberties to be understood in terms of a literal and absolute meaning.

Interestingly, the authors of the study point out that adherents of Christian nationalism do not necessarily adhere to a singular interpretative theological tradition. Rather those of this perspective are not only conservative Evangelicals but also traditionalist Catholics or even those that construe existence through a religious lens but do not necessarily practice their faith through formalized church attendance.

Such a definition raises a number of issues and questions perhaps even more important than the right to bear arms. Among these rank why certain technocrats want to eliminate this particular liberty and, conversely, why Americans must not allow this precious freedom to be taken away if they desire to retain those more obvious such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The first presupposition denigrated as going “beyond merely acknowledging some sincere religious commitments of the Founding Fathers” is that America should always be distinctively Christian in terms of national identity. But if the majority in the nation are Christian at least to the degree that they have no problem identifying the institutions of such in terms of origin, why are these obligated to be altered to placate a small cabal of disgruntled secularists?

The next issue raised by the authors of the study that ought to be of concern is opposition to enumerated liberties understood as being divine, literal and absolute.

If rights are not understood as being divine in origin, it follows that these protections must derive then from being bestowed upon the individual by the state as the ultimate authority answerable to nothing higher in a materialistic or naturalistic universe. After all, even if for a moment the institution decides to grant those subject to it a degree of leeway referred to colloquially as “rights”, there is nothing preventing these from being revoked at a moment's notice because of the near monopolistic use of force utilized by the state. For even in a situation where the population has access to basic firearms, these are minuscule in terms of the sorts of munitions available to the state in the era of total war.

Only when rights are construed as being bequeathed upon mankind by God apart from the state can they be perceived as absolute and unchanging. For such a gift would be a reflection of God's absolute perfection and unchanging goodness.

Nor would an honest or descent person want it any other way. For if rights are granted by an individual or institution that is fallible by nature, who is to say that these rights were not mistakes to begin with.

This concern is evidenced in the case of Alex Jones. It has been concluded that a controversialist such as himself must be “deplatformed” for the sake of the social good because of his propensity to disseminate ideas contradictory to the narratives concocted by globalist puppet masters determining what will or will not constitute acceptable factuality.

Most people, even his admirers, will eventually admit that Jones has said shocking and outrageous things over the years. But what if this government that can adapt the scope of the allowable in order to calibrate what the technocrats conclude is the sort of society that they desire decide to contract the boundaries of permissible utterances further?

Believe that Jesus is the only path to Heaven? But if rights do not exist above the material world, what if a government concludes such cannot be said for fear of undermining the sense of equality of those residing within its jurisdiction? Unless the people are allowed to retain some kind of tangible check on such power run amok.

By Frederick Meekins

Views: 25

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post Wondering
33 minutes ago
Less Prone favorited Boris's page Tulsi Shitting on Hillary
37 minutes ago
Central Scrutinizer added a discussion to the group Marijuana- "Its not just for getting stoned anymore"
Thumbnail

Yes Virginia, There is a Sativa Clause

Weed Dealing ain't quite what it used to be anymore, looks like my Co-Knek-shun has stepped up…See More
37 minutes ago
Less Prone favorited Central Scrutinizer's blog post Clinton Takes Veiled Shot at Gabbard: ‘She’s the Favorite of the Russians’ to Run Third-Party
38 minutes ago
Less Prone favorited Diana's photo
44 minutes ago
Boris commented on Boris's page Remember the young Chinese-American woman who was stripped of her Miss Michigan beauty pageant title for her pro trump tweets? Turns out she has more American Indian in her than Elizabeth Warren.
"True"
47 minutes ago
Boris commented on Central Scrutinizer's blog post Clinton Takes Veiled Shot at Gabbard: ‘She’s the Favorite of the Russians’ to Run Third-Party
48 minutes ago
Boris commented on honeygirl's video
50 minutes ago
Boris favorited Diana's video
50 minutes ago
Boris favorited James T. Kirk's video
51 minutes ago
Diana posted a video

'Invisibility cloak' that could hide tanks and troops looks closer to reality

Harry Potter’s ‘invisibility cloak’ appears closer to reality as Canadian camouflage manufacturer Hyperstealth Biotechnology has applied for patents on its ‘...
1 hour ago
Charles Cox replied to Chris of the family Masters's discussion Why Most of the People Can't Wake up to Reality
"I have a feeling that many issues I had to overcome stemmed from the fact that my parents were the…"
1 hour ago
Central Scrutinizer posted a blog post

Clinton Takes Veiled Shot at Gabbard: ‘She’s the Favorite of the Russians’ to Run Third-Party

Clinton Takes Veiled Shot at Gabbard: ‘She’s the Favorite of the Russians’ to Run Third-PartyDavid…See More
1 hour ago
James Roberts commented on James Roberts's video
1 hour ago
James Roberts posted a video

Ann Coulter - Part 1 of 2 | The Eric Metaxas Radio Show

Ann Coulter pulls no punches giving her thoughts on the Trump presidency so far, including building the wall, nominating Supreme Court justices, and generall...
2 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Diana's photo
2 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted