I want to examine the differences in how things flow in various societal structures. I chose the relatively benign notion of the question of having everyOne wear black on Thursdays. Let Me begin:

In a monarchy, the decree-er can say, “You all will wear black on Thursdays.” Those who believe either that the decree-er has the right to make that choice for Them or have good reason to believe They will be bullied if They don’t comply choose to wear black every Thursday. There is a decree, and it’s never called a Law, but it can be called an “ordinance,” or a “rule,” or other label. And many speak of it as a “law.”

In a plural archy, the decree-ers discuss the decrees that go out, and if They say, “Black on Thursday! It’s a go!” then again, Those who believe and Those with fear choose to wear black once a week. And again, the decree goes out as a “command” or a “statute” or some such.

In a democracy, the idea is put to a vote, and if the majority say that black will be worn on Thursday, then One had better wear black on Thursday or else someOne will bully You! A “bill” or “code” or “regulation” issues forth, and Your neighbor will turn You in if You are seen in green.

In a solutocracy, the question would be asked, “What problem is the color any One is wearing on a specific day creating?” That might follow, if such a case existed that not wearing black on Thursdays was a problem, with the question, “Is this a case that an Ethical solution can be found for?” No preset “court” exists, but that info can be offered regarding problems, and all who care may solve for the problem Ethically.

Clearly, no One is going be forced, by fear, to wear black at all, let alone making a ritual of it. But to any who believe that is a good idea – They may wear black as it suits Them. Individual freedom is retained to the highest degree in a solutocracy.

We all know of a case (or many) where the “letter of the law” created a rude miscarriage of justice, and in a solutocracy problems are solved for, Ethically (Lawfully), case by case. We all may add Our voice as judge on any matter of the three Laws of Ethics, whether it be in an initial crime or unEthical punishment. We all may offer evidence if We have any. We don’t fret possible problems in the future, but solve for each problem as it arises.

Let’s get more controversial – the issue of cannabis. In all cases of Some having “say-so,” freedom is very limited. Clearly, with tens of millions regularly partaking every day, We aren’t seeing much in the way of problems in its use. Nothing to solve for there. We see problems arise because of any money involved – but in the best environment for a solutocracy to function, money is removed (free energy=no need for money – see My piece in The Abundance Paradigm Foundational Writings). We see problems arising from Some following orders to bully People that use it. Since, in a solutocracy, We don’t bully People who are not choosing to create problems/behave unEthically, the bully problems do not arise. Where there are problems, Those who care will solve the problems by Ethical consensus. (Serious problems will spread like wildfire over the web…)

What defines “Ethical?” Though embracing principles in a wider scope, the foundation rests in the three Laws of Ethics (also called Common Law):

1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage the property of anOther
3. Do not defraud (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

In solving problems, therefore, no solution is acceptable that breaks these three Laws. Killing someOne is not an acceptable solution. Starving someOne is equally not acceptable. But confining Them, taking Them out of social circulation, is.

Needless to say, I advocate for a solutocracy, as it supports fully the principles We are told the corporation, THE UNITED STATES, masquerading as “Our” controlmind, says it stands for (lying, completely): freedom, justice, and pursuit of happiness.

A question I ask is whether We support principles or pieces of paper. Do We want a system that supports force and unEthical solutions? Or do We want to build something that will give Us the freedom that so Many give lip service to?

If You want freedom in an Ethical society, please share this with Many. Also check out the rest of My blog here.

NOTE:  In reading that over I realized that I failed to distinguish between what equates to the legal system We have today from handling things in protection of Self and Others. Though such defense has a component of will in it, it is reactionary in its root, and if the only solution to the impending death of non-consenting Individuals is to kill the one(s) inflicting the harm, then that is an Ethical choice.

Views: 170


You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Latest Activity

James Sweeney posted a blog post

Marketing Job Resume

Products that have been produced by the manufacturing companies for the customers can only reach them through a concept called marketing. Many steps are taken either through media campaign, like TV, Cinema, Magazines, Brochures and Catalogs etc to…See More
8 minutes ago
cheeki kea commented on the mighty bull's video

Nuclear blasts, preserved on film

"Why the big time weapon interest mb ? Nuclear free -remember, or are you on about that o-zone consequence ? I think you better go way bush before you mention that theory, a long way. You'll upset the climate change industry. (And it might not…"
10 minutes ago
Mrs. Tif Morgan posted a discussion

Sould YouTube Be Investigated, to See if Any of Their Members are ISIS Supporters.

 Do you all remember all them nice videos  you all helped to rate up at YouTube? All of them are gone. Are their Muslims working for YouTube that hate Americans? Every anti ISIS video was attack by the YouTube Team.Toptentogo's News Network Better…See More
40 minutes ago
Mrs. Tif Morgan replied to Mrs. Tif Morgan's discussion Isis Calls on Followers to ‘Take Revenge’ for New Zealand Terror Attack
" Lets see, you said: "so why would isis come to do their job. (oh -thats right.... ) Most Muslim workers see it as an unpleasant joke"  First off ISIS is all ready there.  You said, Zionist's caused the terror, …"
52 minutes ago
oldranger_68 favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post If Only People Knew Vaccine Info...
1 hour ago
cheeki kea commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post The Public Notice
" Are going to publish that in the gazette ?"
1 hour ago
Old Denmark posted videos
1 hour ago
Chris of the family Masters posted blog posts
2 hours ago
cheeki kea favorited Raz Putin's video
3 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on Diana's video

Congresswoman Demonstrates 'Worst Parking Job Ever'

""Car park Road Rage event alert." Evidence of victim provocation and ill-intent Noted. She just walks away from this parking disaster and expects her car to be in the same condition she left it upon return ?- must be thick, and a danger to…"
3 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Raz Putin's video
3 hours ago
Raz Putin commented on Raz Putin's video

Another 'Anti-Semitic Hate Crime' Hoax EXPOSED!

"So many fake hate crime attacks. Jussie Smollett is in good company here."
8 hours ago
Raz Putin favorited Raz Putin's video
8 hours ago
Raz Putin posted a video

Another 'Anti-Semitic Hate Crime' Hoax EXPOSED!

Know More News with Adam Green https://www.KnowMoreNews.org/ Support Know More News! Paypal Donations - https://www.paypal.me/KnowMoreNews Patreon - https://...
8 hours ago
Raz Putin's photo was featured

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Quote

“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart…
8 hours ago

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted