I want to examine the differences in how things flow in various societal structures. I chose the relatively benign notion of the question of having everyOne wear black on Thursdays. Let Me begin:

In a monarchy, the decree-er can say, “You all will wear black on Thursdays.” Those who believe either that the decree-er has the right to make that choice for Them or have good reason to believe They will be bullied if They don’t comply choose to wear black every Thursday. There is a decree, and it’s never called a Law, but it can be called an “ordinance,” or a “rule,” or other label. And many speak of it as a “law.”

In a plural archy, the decree-ers discuss the decrees that go out, and if They say, “Black on Thursday! It’s a go!” then again, Those who believe and Those with fear choose to wear black once a week. And again, the decree goes out as a “command” or a “statute” or some such.

In a democracy, the idea is put to a vote, and if the majority say that black will be worn on Thursday, then One had better wear black on Thursday or else someOne will bully You! A “bill” or “code” or “regulation” issues forth, and Your neighbor will turn You in if You are seen in green.

In a solutocracy, the question would be asked, “What problem is the color any One is wearing on a specific day creating?” That might follow, if such a case existed that not wearing black on Thursdays was a problem, with the question, “Is this a case that an Ethical solution can be found for?” No preset “court” exists, but that info can be offered regarding problems, and all who care may solve for the problem Ethically.

Clearly, no One is going be forced, by fear, to wear black at all, let alone making a ritual of it. But to any who believe that is a good idea – They may wear black as it suits Them. Individual freedom is retained to the highest degree in a solutocracy.

We all know of a case (or many) where the “letter of the law” created a rude miscarriage of justice, and in a solutocracy problems are solved for, Ethically (Lawfully), case by case. We all may add Our voice as judge on any matter of the three Laws of Ethics, whether it be in an initial crime or unEthical punishment. We all may offer evidence if We have any. We don’t fret possible problems in the future, but solve for each problem as it arises.

Let’s get more controversial – the issue of cannabis. In all cases of Some having “say-so,” freedom is very limited. Clearly, with tens of millions regularly partaking every day, We aren’t seeing much in the way of problems in its use. Nothing to solve for there. We see problems arise because of any money involved – but in the best environment for a solutocracy to function, money is removed (free energy=no need for money – see My piece in The Abundance Paradigm Foundational Writings). We see problems arising from Some following orders to bully People that use it. Since, in a solutocracy, We don’t bully People who are not choosing to create problems/behave unEthically, the bully problems do not arise. Where there are problems, Those who care will solve the problems by Ethical consensus. (Serious problems will spread like wildfire over the web…)

What defines “Ethical?” Though embracing principles in a wider scope, the foundation rests in the three Laws of Ethics (also called Common Law):

1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage the property of anOther
3. Do not defraud (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

In solving problems, therefore, no solution is acceptable that breaks these three Laws. Killing someOne is not an acceptable solution. Starving someOne is equally not acceptable. But confining Them, taking Them out of social circulation, is.

Needless to say, I advocate for a solutocracy, as it supports fully the principles We are told the corporation, THE UNITED STATES, masquerading as “Our” controlmind, says it stands for (lying, completely): freedom, justice, and pursuit of happiness.

A question I ask is whether We support principles or pieces of paper. Do We want a system that supports force and unEthical solutions? Or do We want to build something that will give Us the freedom that so Many give lip service to?

If You want freedom in an Ethical society, please share this with Many. Also check out the rest of My blog here.

NOTE:  In reading that over I realized that I failed to distinguish between what equates to the legal system We have today from handling things in protection of Self and Others. Though such defense has a component of will in it, it is reactionary in its root, and if the only solution to the impending death of non-consenting Individuals is to kill the one(s) inflicting the harm, then that is an Ethical choice.


Views: 183

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Chris of the family Masters commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post From James Belcher -- False Flag in Virginia
"They can take guns from any Citizen, but cannot take it from National. Use this remedy and change…"
1 minute ago
cheeki kea commented on stormtruther's status
"Greetings stormtruther."
15 minutes ago
cheeki kea commented on Guardian of Scotland's status
"Good to see you back G.o.S, like-minded friend. That's a good and timely video for common…"
38 minutes ago
Chris of the family Masters posted blog posts
58 minutes ago
cheeki kea favorited Mr. Sizzle's photo
1 hour ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Mr. Sizzle's photo
Thumbnail

Virginia’s Governor

"looks about right, lol, yup ol monkey-boy is about to unwittingly release the Krakken on…"
1 hour ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Mr. Sizzle's photo
1 hour ago
Charles Cox favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post American National Alert and Appeal
1 hour ago
Charles Cox favorited Mr. Sizzle's photo
1 hour ago
Central Scrutinizer posted a blog post
2 hours ago
Ivan Osteopat posted a status
"East European School of Osteopathy, official website https://osteoukr.com/"
3 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on stormtruther's video
Thumbnail

Greta Thunberg tells world leaders "You haven't seen the last of us" I think this job is going to her head!

"When people are so fucking stupid that they are rallying around a little insane drama queen we know…"
7 hours ago
Doc Vega favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post American National Alert and Appeal
8 hours ago
James Roberts posted a blog post
9 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle posted a discussion
11 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post American National Alert and Appeal
12 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle posted photos
12 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post American National Alert and Appeal
"@Steve Yes,  it’s called the Samson option where Israel openly states that it has…"
13 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle commented on steve's blog post No cookies for colored santa and no this ain't no "ONION" article
"I feel sorry for the EMT that had to provide medical assistance to that thing.  He’s…"
14 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited steve's blog post No cookies for colored santa and no this ain't no "ONION" article
14 hours ago

© 2020   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted