Putin, the Ukraine and Bigfoot

What? Is there some sort of shelf life on imaginary monsters the US media release to maintain mind control on Americans? What happen to Kim Jong-un? One minute he's on the verge of launching nuclear warheads at us (Oh, the horror!) and the next minute his name drops from the English language as well as reality. Now, we are served a buffet of illogical, bull$hit about Russia's Vladimir Putin and his vague as hell "violation of the territorial integrity" in the lifeless, uninhabited Ukraine!

Obama and Putin put on a rather poor pissing contest for no apparent reason other than terrorize sleeping Americans with fears of Russia taking us off the map due to Obama's blood-lust and $hit talkin. What a joke. These ass clowns cant even pull a decent story out of their arses at this point.

Yo MSM, let your holy and chosen masters know that:

A) Their story might be more believable if the Ukraine (former Soviet Union) was actually inhabited. Like with people. Live ones.

Did these sick animals forget they unleashed their prized invention, the atomic bomb at Chernobyl, where the most deadly nuclear attack in history buried the acts of savagery and hellish atrocities against millions of gentiles? Graphite fire burned for 10 full days and those who weren't killed on target died within weeks while suffering hell on earth. Vast areas of the former Soviet union are to date void of anything but the echoed cries of slaughtered victims from the grave and radioactive materials, and radionuclides that kill even today. Think cancer.

B) Putin might scare us with his big scary threats IF he hadn't already proved he lacks any form of testicular fortitude by bowing down and licking the hands that have circumcised him.

Favorite

2 members favorited this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Leigh James on March 8, 2014 at 5:52am

I really prefer your own words, and your own opinions but..

According to above claims the "Jew" is a Jew and is named accordingly. I am guessing the author is proposing that they have imposters among them today, Khazars, whom are the true culprits. And they are an ancient Aryan-mongrel race that converted to the Jews religion. Rather the original Jew still exists is not stated.

You wrote "Then alternative media starts jumping to simplified conclusions ... about all Khazarians being "Jewish". Not at all. The falacy is Khazarian -> Jewish"

Perhaps you could rephrase your comment as it is nothing but a reversal of noun and adjective placement. Otherwise known as "double talk".

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 6:02am

Perhaps you could rephrase your comment as it is nothing but a reversal of noun and adjective placement. Otherwise known as "double talk".

If we have set A (1, 2, 3) and set B (2), then B is a subset of A

B < A

But A does not imply B

(A -> B) not true

Set A to Khazarian and B to Judaist Khazarian (Ashkenazis)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh James on March 8, 2014 at 6:24am

An ancient Aryan-mongrel race that converted to or created the current religion of Judaism as to avoid forced adherence or affiliation with all other theists?

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 8:28am

Exactly. Zionism, that has nothing to do with Jewishness. Some once stated "anti-Semitism can be used to our advantage"

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 9:49am

Robber baron (industrialist)
Robber barons became a derogatory term applied to wealthy and powerful 19th-century American businessmen that appeared in North American periodical ... These practices included exerting control over national resources, accruing high levels of government influence, paying extremely low wages, squashing competition by acquiring competitors in order to create monopolies and eventually raise prices, and schemes to sell stock at inflated prices[2] to unsuspecting investors in a manner which would eventually destroy the company for which the stock was issued and impoverish investors.[2] The term combines the sense of criminal ("robber") and illegitimate aristocracy (a baron is an illegitimate role in a republic).[3] ...U.S. political and economic commentator Matthew Josephson further popularized the term during the Great Depression in a 1934 book by the same title.

Wikipedia don't tell us much about who they are, except as "industrialists". This is very much the Zionist mindset = business as war against anything not Khazarian (they will be offered membership or bankrupcy)

http://12160.info/forum/topics/history-repeating-itself-rothschild-...

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 6:22am