Comment

Comment by Nancy Oakley on November 5, 2012 at 6:30pm

The Georgia Guidestones is a large granite monument in Elbert County, Georgia, USA. A message clearly conveying a set of ten guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages, and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient languages' scripts: Babylonian, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, and Egyptian hieroglyphs.

The structure is sometimes referred to as an "American Stonehenge".^[1] The monument is 19 feet 3 inches (5.87 m) tall, made from six granite slabs weighing 237,746 pounds (107,840 kg) in all.^[2] One slab stands in the center, with four arranged around it. A capstone lies on top of the five slabs, which are astronomically aligned. An additional stone tablet, which is set in the ground a short distance to the west of the structure, provides some notes on the history and purpose of the Guidestones.

A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. Moving clockwise around the structure from due north, these languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian.

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on November 5, 2012 at 5:39pm

..........but tomorrow is Tuesday ;)

Comment by suzie on November 5, 2012 at 5:39pm

I am pretty sure that between the fluoride in the water, aspartame in too many things to list, chem trails in the air, processed foods with corn syrup and "natural flavors" and all kinds of numbered food dyes, vaccines, and the school system telling us our kids are all mentally challenged so we drug them and the MD's tell adults the need phyco drugs because they are nervous or just depressed, the delta waves from TV mind controlling us and telling us what to be afraid of and what we like and don't like.  Who is good and who is bad, what is good and what is bad ~ moms and dads can't make there kids a school lunch because they are just not smart enough to do it right so that it won't offend any other kid at school~ or maybe its just that we stopped caring somewhere along the way ~ we forgot to be vigilant of freedom and trusted a government to do the right things forgetting that the enemy within is the one to fear so as we slept we were poisoned in body mind and soul and left the gate unguarded so now we all are paying the price of a soldier who slept while on duty and now you know why they are shot in times of war ~~ we may want peace but its a hard sell when the ones we trusted have waged war with the whole world and want you to pay for it and if you do not !! well may god have mercy on your soul if you don't you will be branded a traitor and a zelot that society needs to fear for the jack booted thugs who have replaced the republic by force have made you oh sleeper the new enemy of the EMPIRE ~    

Comment by suzie on November 5, 2012 at 1:19pm

Good post Larry ~ The name of his post is the election that spawned a revolution ~ Obama came in with "hope and change" he will leave having been the spark of a revolution and maybe that was the plan all along .. ;)

Comment by Nathan on November 2, 2012 at 1:30pm

“CORPORATIVISM IN MONEY AND BANKING HAS LED AMERICA TO FASCISM”
http://devvy.net/pdf2/august2012/cmre_address_may_2012.pdf

Comment by Nathan on October 29, 2012 at 7:33pm

@Larry,

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/dispositi...

Comment by Nathan on October 27, 2012 at 11:35am

Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution
(although the case for the supremacy of the Constitution could be presented much more thoroughly, this is short and to the point)
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/staterights/treaties.htm

Comment by Nathan on October 24, 2012 at 4:05pm

How Leftist law has hijacked the U.S. constitution

Each September, the assumptions and methodologies of law-school curricula are handed down as if from Sinai to tens of thousands of 1Ls. They are readily accepted by the students, who are under enormous pressure to assimilate and adjust to them quickly. Students are told nothing of progressive philosophy’s origins or ultimate purposes, and notice little of its hostility to the Founders’ Constitution. Such lack of awareness is evident even among many law-school faculty members, who act as Moses without self-knowledge, sensible only of the first commandment.

For those with the passion to rule — which describes most bright twentysomethings — such a sensibility is very useful. They see themselves doing God’s work, or something like it, for they do at least know that God is banished from the public square. In his recent book Schools for Misrule, Walter Olson recounts how the dean of one of the nation’s most prestigious law schools routinely greeted incoming students by welcoming them to “the republic of conscience.”

Of course, it’s a conscience to be imposed by the cognoscenti, through the mechanism of the courts, on the unwashed masses
who still conceive of politics as something to be done the old-fashioned way, i.e., consensually. What the students quickly imbibe in the law schools is uniquely well suited to breaking the constraints imposed by self-government and the Constitution.

The modern law school came into existence largely as an adjunct of progressive ideology. It was to be the training ground for progressives dedicated to overcoming early-20th-century judicial resistance to the political assault on our Constitution of limited and enumerated powers. As with the modern discipline of political science, the modern law school was built around core progressive assumptions: a philosophy of history, a faith in the power of scientific intelligence to smooth the movement of history, and a deep suspicion of existing institutional forms.

By the 1920s, leading legal scholars were confident they had discovered a new science of jurisprudence — one that would emphasize evolutionary growth rather than black-letter law or theories of law rooted in the permanent nature of human beings. This melding of social Darwinism and philosophical pragmatism animated the growing legal professoriate to direct its attention to processes, functions, and change more than principles, rules, and continuity. The new approach to the study of law had many manifestations. It defined the aspirations of important legal movements such as sociological jurisprudence and legal realism, which sought to ensure, respectively, that legal interpretation would be informed by social data, and that legal outcomes would be determined by perceived social benefits rather than the strict construction of law. The old-fashioned common lawyer was out, to be replaced by a progressive social engineer with legal training.

More here: http://dissectleft.blogspot.com/ (scroll down the page)

Comment by Nathan on October 24, 2012 at 10:45am

True enough, Troy.

 

 

Comment by Nathan on October 22, 2012 at 2:04pm

By section 4, article I, the Congress are authorized, at any time, by law, to make, or alter, regulations respecting the time, place, and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives, except as to the places of choosing senators. By this clause the right of election itself, is, in a great measure, transferred from the people to their rulers. — One would think, that if any thing was necessary to be made a fundamental article of the original compact, it would be, that of fixing the branches of the legislature, so as to put it out of its power to alter itself by modifying the election of its own members at will and pleasure. When a people once resign the privilege of a fair election, they clearly have none left worth contending for.

Had the power of regulating elections been left under the direction of the state legislatures, where the people are not only nominally but substantially represented, it would have been secure; but if it was taken out of their hands, it surely ought to have been fixed on such a basis as to have put it out of the power of the foederal legislature to deprive the people of it by law. Provision should have been made for marking out the states into districts, and for choosing, by a majority of votes, a person out of each of them of permanent property and residence in the district which he was to represent.

If the people of America will submit to a constitution that will vest in the
hands of any body of men a right to deprive them by law of the privilege of a fair election, they will submit to almost any thing. Reasoning with them will be in vain, they must be left until they are brought to reflection by feeling oppression — they will then have to wrest from their oppressors, by a strong hand. that which they now possess, and which they may retain if they will exercise but a moderate share of prudence and firmness.

http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus04.htm

 

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• …
• 14
• Next ›
• Page