Activist Post
It appears the United States is determined to engage in yet another war without having been attacked or even having their allies attacked. The brazen Obama doctrine of preemptively bombing civilians to prevent a humanitarian crisis may soon be coming to another lucky country; Syria.
The Syrian military is prepared to use chemical weapons against its own people and is awaiting final orders from President Bashar Assad, U.S. officials told NBC News on Wednesday.
BULL BISCUITS! This is just a repeat of the Saddam's nuclear weapons lie used to start that war.
This will backfire on the US. As soon as they stage a false-flag attack on the Syrians using chemical weapons they hand Iran the perfect political justification to abandon the mutual defense treaty and stay out of Syria.
Started by Less Prone. Last reply by Less Prone Oct 19, 2016. 1 Reply 1 Favorite
Started by Less Prone. Last reply by margaret Mar 21, 2014. 1 Reply 1 Favorite
Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by Less Prone Jan 14, 2014. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
Started by Less Prone. Last reply by Less Prone Oct 26, 2013. 1 Reply 1 Favorite
Started by truth. Last reply by olde reb Sep 14, 2013. 2 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by guest_blog Sep 13, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Cryptocurrency. Last reply by Nobody Will Observe Sep 13, 2013. 5 Replies 1 Favorite
Started by truth Sep 11, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by truth Sep 11, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Karen Quinn-Tostado. Last reply by Less Prone Sep 11, 2013. 3 Replies 4 Favorites
Comment
I do not I confess know the purpose of it--I had bet Algeria would be next and folks are already betting on whether Iran or Venezuela would be next. I am puzzled. An easy answer would be "recolonization" but if so why? Africa's economy is already dependent on the metropolis--oil (that is why Venezuela Africa--northern Africa I had thought was already dominated--Iran would be a difficult one though I suppose Israel could go rogue. Now I speak under correction but it beats me---I don't know what do you think?
Now that we have all that cleared up, maybe we can get back to the topic at hand and the purpose of this group. The impending attack on Syria by imperialistic, corporatist hell bent on global domination. I am sure that if you wished to discuss the hidden hand behind the civil rights(gov't privilege) movement, you could create a separate group and invite members.
* typo...legalese
The Bill of Rights being amended to the Constitution was a concession made by the framers in order to get it ratified by the States. The BoR doesn't grant any rights, rather protects those that we are born with.
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religious preference(or lack thereof), press, protest and redress of grievances. Of course free communication about technology is included in free speech.
The BoR is intended to protect the People from the "ruling class" while many later amendments used legalize to trick people into voluntary servitude. (Read my blog entry titled, Sedition by Syntax).
Being as I have never read Alice in Wonderland nor Through the Looking Glass, I have no idea about the quote to which you are referring.
Concerning segregated schools...I never mentioned that so I have no idea why that was even brought up in this conversation.
Would you consider homeschooling a form of segregated schooling?
true free market --well hayek friedman Smith (often misread) I was not asking you to support communism--but you might want to have a closer look at the bill of rights--e.g. The first amendment as you know was designed to make possible the free communication about about technology--we did not want another inquisition. Have you noticed btw that the bill of rights and other laws or amendments ((the 14the comes to mind)) are interpreted in ways that suit what I call in my unfree dogmatic fashion the ruling class--I believe segregated schools are illegal by law did they not say that in 1954? Have a look see--There is a line from alice in wonderland or is it through the looking glass that comes to mind but I cannot quote it due to failing iq points but it is well known--
Ah, now we are getting somewhere. I am well aware of behind the scenes influences which guided the civil rights movement so this is not news to me.
Personally I would love to see a return to true free market principles rather than the crony capitalism(corporatism) that has infected every aspect of business. I do not, nor will I ever, support communism.
I am also much aware of the masking of history. The truth has been hidden from humanity for ages, it is nothing new. I have posted a few essays on regarding this very topic.
I believe in freedom of the individual. Communism spits in the face of the Bill of Rights. Of course, this is just my opinion and I could be wrong.
ok i play there is no spell check on this machine. I am arguing that there was a hidden civil rights movement---principally the scu (cp) of Alabama and that it was a priority of the USSR . To answer your questions 1) Personally I would like to see an emergence of a third period USSR or The Black Panther Party. SNCC or an organization like it with some modifications would also be pleasant. I was trying give you some evidence for the USSR's role in the liberation movement in the south and yes Communism would be beer and skittles to me. I also was trying to distinguish Bernays work from a deeper form of historical masking. We know his role in the Arbenz affair just as we know Leopold's role in Congo. I was trying to distinguish that from what I called historical mythologies that resist falsification. I am sorry you cannot follow that--others have--perhaps you want to check those i q points.
"oh I notice some spelling errors do forgive me my hand beat up a cops nightstick a week ago at an occupy gathering"
I do hope that you punished that evil night stick....on the other hand(pun intended) there is a feature of most web browsers called "spell check". It actually underlines misspelled words in red and a user can right-click on the word for suggestion to correct the mistake.
Please excuse my lack of understanding.
I find it hard to follow your line of reasoning.
Are you promoting communism or are you denouncing it?
Are you saying that there needs to be a resurgence of the CPUSA or that it needs to fade away into the annuls of history?
Apart from the spelling and grammatical errors, the over all message of what you wish to convey appears jumbled and incoherent. I actually feel like I am losing IQ points just trying to understand what you wrote, much less what you are trying to say.
oh I notice some spelling errors do forgive me my hand beat up a cops nightstick a week ago at an occupy gathering
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
© 2024 Created by truth. Powered by
You need to be a member of Impending Attack on Syria to add comments!