Defenders of the right to bear arms vigorously observe that the Second Amendment is the constitutional provision that ensures the ongoing viability of those freedoms guaranteed by the First deemed by many to be of a more noble or loftier character. Those with their vision clouded with aspirations of how they would like the world to be rather than how it actually is often snidely respond that a level of moral awareness has been reached where the use of force or even the insinuation of an appeal to such is no longer necessary among the COMMUNITY of enlightened individuals to safeguard those protections referred to as rights.

A bill submitted to the Florida legislature for consideration provides clarification as to the precarious and interlocking nature of the Bill of Rights where, if one of these in undermined, they are all ultimately undermined. Now that what is insisted is a consensus has coalesced that firearms in the hands of minors is so lamentable as to require in most instances intervention on the part of the state, it has been proposed that it ought also be against the law to the extent of a penalty of up to $1000 and/or a year in jail for anyone under the age of 18 to post an image of a firearm to social media.

So what other objects not inherently illegal or immoral in and of themselves ought youth to be punished for depicting in an artistic manner disseminated by electronic communication?

Youths below a certain age are not permitted to drive automobiles. Does that mean that a teen auto enthusiast that uploads the image of a vehicle to a social media profile ought to arrested in a police raid?

Given how broadly the proposed statute is written, continuing with this analogy to expose how asinine this is, the teen would not even have to be depicted driving the car without a permit or even simply seated in the driver's seat. One would be in violation of the law for simply posting an image of an automobile. It must be seriously asked would hate crimes penalties be added if the car depicted happened to be the General Lee from “The Dukes Of Hazard”?

Given the way the proposed law could be interpreted, could a child that likes to draw robots be imprisoned for posting an image of Megatron, the Decepticon leader from the Transformers who in his classic form not only transforms into a gun but has a massive canon strapped to his arm? Don't think this is absurd?

In 2008, a passenger was booted from a flight for doing nothing more than wearing a shirt where Autobot leader Optimus Prime from the same Transfomers series was depicted holding a gun. That's right, a passenger was removed from a flight not for carrying an actual weapon but for rather wearing the shirt with a picture of a cartoon character holding a gun that in actuality could not fire a single shot.

If today subjects of the regime can potentially face imprisonment and financial ruination for mere images that do nothing more than symbolize inanimate objects, where will this theoretically end? Might someone be subject to interdiction by law enforcement for simply posting a picture of the Cross, a crucifix, or the equivalent of a status update reading “Jesus is Lord” or “He is risen, indeed”?

Sophisticates will respond don't be silly. Those only represent ideas or beliefs. Guns or the promotion of firearms, on the other hand, represent a tangible threat to individual well being and maintenance of a sustainable social order.

It might be one thing to enforce prohibitions against weapons conveyed in a manner that does not comply with promulgated standards. However, if one can criminalize something that is not inherently evil in and of itself as the vehicle through which an idea is transferred from one mind to another, the floodgates have been thrown open to a new form of tyranny that is nearly boundless. Should images of sugary snacks be forbidden because of the dangers these delights pose to diabetics and the obese?

C.S. Lewis once observed that the way contemporary society treats sex was analogous to those dieing of starvation gathering to catch a brief glimpse of a meal that the viewers would not be allowed to taste nor touch. One must now ponder in deliberative seriousness if a mind as formidable as his own could conceive of a time when even the image of something innocuous would be as forbidden as a behavior allowed to fester out of control as a result of the attempt to expunge the transcendent eternalities intended to protect against such horrific outrages.

By Frederick Meekins

Views: 450

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Chris of the family Masters on July 11, 2019 at 3:29am
Anything to exert a control. Nanny state loves to control, however idiotic rules are deployed.
Comment by Burbia on July 11, 2019 at 12:39am
Comment by cheeki kea on July 10, 2019 at 5:44am

Good post, your on to it Dr Meekins. Just this week my local paper spilt beans on the New police secrete vetting No Go's list for gun licence applicants, and that list was ..... - a shaven head, camouflage clothes, tattoos, Celtic or Norse symbols, confederate flags, disgruntled 'attack' people, white supremacy, And Muslim converts ! -( must be sharia law for them, as citizens not practicing Islam are prohibited from bearing arms ) this is how insane it's got. Of cause After the list was published, police Then embargoed staff from outside discussion of the e mailed contents with threat of imprisonment and fine. But too late. 

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

the mighty bull commented on Central Scrutinizer's video
Thumbnail

A smart phone from 1984 - The STC Executel

"I still got my first cell phone on hire purchase and I am lucky it never got repoed . but I still…"
6 minutes ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Central Scrutinizer's video
Thumbnail

A smart phone from 1984 - The STC Executel

"Well, I thought my first mobile phone was a 'brick'. It looked like it, Nokia 100. Got it…"
41 minutes ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited James Roberts's photo
2 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on James Roberts's photo
Thumbnail

What America Thinks It Is

""Look!!, Up in the air.... it's a bird.... it's a plane..... IT'S POOFTER…"
2 hours ago
Burbia commented on Carmine Clemente's group Expose: Barack Hussein Obama
3 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Phyllis Maka's blog post THE MIRACLE OF LIFE EXTENSION TECH WAS BURIED - Jim Stone
"...and G.H.W Bush Sr, David Rockafelcher, Zbigniew Brzezinski, & John McCain are Pissed!!!"
4 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post God Demands America Remove 'In God We Trust' From Currency
4 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Boris's video
Thumbnail

Top Forensic Pathologist: ONLY 2% of Hanging Deaths Resulted in Broken Hyoid Bone -- Like What Epstein Had (VIDEO)

"MCC gotta be proud of their suicide history record .... Jeff Boi RD was only the 2nd suicide in…"
4 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Mrs. Tif Morgan's discussion Control Through Concepts: Will World Governments Confiscate Gold?
4 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Boris's video
Thumbnail

Speakers Corner Live | $2 Text-to-speech

"I'm not much for drinking bacon either ;( w00t!"
4 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Boris's video
5 hours ago
Burbia commented on Boris's page Bizarre photo op of Ghislain Maxwell while reading book about CIA that she reviewed on amazon today
5 hours ago
Exposure commented on Exposure's blog post Why Epstein is not dead!
"Or should we say muddying the swamp Burbia! ;) "
5 hours ago
Boris commented on Boris's video
5 hours ago
oldranger_68 favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post BOOT CAMP COMING UP...
7 hours ago
Burbia commented on Exposure's blog post Why Epstein is not dead!
"This is what is called muddying the waters."
7 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted