Capital Controls ACT (HIRE ACT) SCARY!

This is a scary realization. I particularly appreciated the analysis provided in the comment section. I have added the 1st comment below to spark discussion.

Posted by: Slowsmile on Raging Debate (article taken from Zero Hedge)

Well I stumbled across this article from Zero Hedge today and it made me gasp in disbelief. As a European and a Brit to boot, I always thought that the tax laws and capital controls of the US were far easier than our laws in Europe and UK. Wrong. This new law -- amusingly nicknamed The HIRE Act (HR 2487) by some US government comedian - was passed into law with barely a whimper from the crowd and with no reportage at all from the US media.

So you thought your savings abroad were safe?

So you want to move abroad and move your money abroad as well?

Think again -- and THINK RESTRICTIVE INTERNATIONAL TAX by the US Government.

Not only is Big Government significantly expanding its reach abroad now, but the rights as well as the savings and options for the ordinary citizen in the street are being markedly reduced.

One aspect of this bill that is also a bit fuzzy is whether the taxes and restrictions also apply to non-cash assets like gold accounts abroad. I guess the safest thing would be to assume that this will also happen in time.

And last I heard, Jim Rogers and family have just put in for Singaporean Citizenship.......

It's Official - America Now Enforces Capital Controls

From Zero Hedge

It couldn't have happened to a nicer country. On March 18, with very little pomp and circumstance, president Obama passed the most recent stimulus act, the $17.5 billion Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (H.R. 2487), brilliantly goalseeked by the administration's millionaire cronies to abbreviate as HIRE. As it was merely the latest in an endless stream of acts destined to expand the government payroll to infinity, nobody cared about it, or actually read it. Because if anyone had read it, the act would have been known as the Capital Controls Act, as one of the lesser, but infinitely more important provisions on page 27, known as Offset Provisions - Subtitle A—Foreign Account Tax Compliance, institutes just that. In brief, the Provision requires that foreign banks not only withhold 30% of all outgoing capital flows (likely remitting the collection promptly back to the US Treasury) but also disclose the full details of non-exempt account-holders to the US and the IRS. And should this provision be deemed illegal by a given foreign nation's domestic laws (think Switzerland), well the foreign financial institution is required to close the account. It's the law. If you thought you could move your capital to the non-sequestration safety of non-US financial institutions, sorry you lose - the law now says so. Capital Controls are now here and are now fully enforced by the law.

Let's parse through the just passed law, which has been mentioned by exactly zero mainstream media outlets.

Here is the default new state of capital outflows:

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after chapter 3 the following new chapter:

‘‘CHAPTER 4—TAXES TO ENFORCE REPORTING ON CERTAIN FOREIGN ACCOUNTS
‘‘Sec. 1471. Withholdable payments to foreign financial institutions.
‘‘Sec. 1472. Withholdable payments to other foreign entities.
‘‘Sec. 1473. Definitions.
‘‘Sec. 1474. Special rules.
‘‘SEC. 1471. WITHHOLDABLE PAYMENTS TO FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any withholdable payment to a foreign financial institution which does not meet the requirements of subsection (b), the withholding agent with respect to such payment shall deduct and withhold from such payment a tax equal to 30 percent of the amount of such payment.

Clarifying who this law applies to:

‘‘(C) in the case of any United States account maintained by such institution, to report on an annual basis the information described in subsection (c) with respect to such account,
‘‘(D) to deduct and withhold a tax equal to 30 percent of—

‘‘(i) any passthru payment which is made by such institution to a recalcitrant account holder or another foreign financial institution which does not meet the requirements of this subsection, and

‘‘(ii) in the case of any passthru payment which is made by such institution to a foreign financial institution which has in effect an election under paragraph (3) with respect to such payment, so much of such payment as is allocable to accounts held by recalcitrant account holders or foreign financial institutions which do not meet the requirements of this subsection.

What happens if this brand new law impinges and/or is in blatant contradiction with existing foreign laws?

‘‘(F) in any case in which any foreign law would (but for a waiver described in clause (i)) prevent the reporting of any information referred to in this subsection or subsection (c) with respect to any United States account maintained by such institution—

‘‘(i) to attempt to obtain a valid and effective waiver of such law from each holder of such account, and
‘‘(ii) if a waiver described in clause (i) is not obtained from each such holder within a reasonable period of time, to close such account.

Not only are capital flows now to be overseen and controlled by the government and the IRS, but holders of foreign accounts can kiss any semblance of privacy goodbye:

‘‘(c) INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE REPORTED ON UNITED STATES ACCOUNTS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The agreement described in subsection (b) shall require the foreign financial institution to report the following with respect to each United States account maintained by such institution:
‘‘(A) The name, address, and TIN of each account holder which is a specified United States person and, in the case of any account holder which is a United States owned foreign entity, the name, address, and TIN of each substantial United States owner of such entity.
‘‘(B) The account number.
‘‘(C) The account balance or value (determined at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may provide).
‘‘(D) Except to the extent provided by the Secretary, the gross receipts and gross withdrawals or payments from the account (determined for such period and in such manner as the Secretary may provide)
.

The only exemption to the rule? If you hold the meager sum of $50,000 or less in foreign accounts.

‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS HELD BY INDIVIDUALS.—Unless the foreign financial institution elects to not have this subparagraph apply, such term shall not include any depository account maintained by such financial institution if—
‘‘(i) each holder of such account is a natural person,and
‘‘(ii) with respect to each holder of such account, the aggregate value of all depository accounts held (in whole or in part) by such holder and maintained by the same financial institution which maintains such account does not exceed $50,000.

And, while we are on the topic of definitions, here is how "financial account" is defined by the US:

‘‘(2) FINANCIAL ACCOUNT.—Except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, the term ‘financial account’ means, with respect to any financial institution—
‘‘(A) any depository account maintained by such financial institution,
‘‘(B) any custodial account maintained by such financial institution, and
‘‘(C) any equity or debt interest in such financial institution (other than interests which are regularly traded on an established securities market). Any equity or debt interest which constitutes a financial account under subparagraph (C) with respect to any financial institution shall be treated for purposes of this section as maintained by such financial institution.

In case you find you do not like to be subject to capital controls, you are now deemed a "Recalcitrant Account Holder."

‘‘(6) RECALCITRANT ACCOUNT HOLDER.—The term ‘recalcitrant account holder’ means any account holder which—
‘‘(A) fails to comply with reasonable requests for the information referred to in subsection (b)(1)(A) or (c)(1)(A),
or ‘‘(B) fails to provide a waiver described in subsection (b)(1)(F) upon request.

But guess what - if you are a foreign Central Bank, or if the Secretary determined that you are "a low risk for tax evasion" (unlike the Secretary himself) you still can do whatever the hell you want:

‘‘(f) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN PAYMENTS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to any payment to the extent that the beneficial owner
of such payment is—
‘‘(1) any foreign government, any political subdivision of a foreign government, or any wholly owned agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing,
‘‘(2) any international organization or any wholly owned agency or instrumentality thereof,
‘‘(3) any foreign central bank of issue, or
‘‘(4) any other class of persons identified by the Secretary for purposes of this subsection as posing a low risk of tax evasion.

One thing we are confused about is whether this law is a preamble, or already incorporates, the flow of non-cash assets, such as commodities, and, thus, gold. If an account transfers, via physical or paper delivery, gold from a domestic account to a foreign one, we are not sure if the language deems this a 30% taxable transaction, although preliminary discussions with lawyers indicates this is likely the case.

And so the noose on capital mobility tightens, as very soon the only option US citizens have when it comes to investing their money, will be in government mandated retirement annuities, which will likely be the next step in the capital control escalation, which will culminate with every single free dollar required to be reinvested into the US, likely in the form of purchasing US Treasury emissions such as Treasuries, TIPS and other worthless pieces of paper.

Congratulations bankrupt America - you are now one step closer to a thoroughly non-free market.

5 Comments

This is seen in repressive African governments to keep people and their money from leaving the country, usually ahead of some new form of increased repression. Thus, the citizens become captive within their own nations and the police state begins. In many African nations, the leaders have previously disarmed the population and then when all is in place, the people become serfs to the aristocratic pals of those in power. The important thing is to carefully slip these controls in as "wise" government policy so not to upset the masses, who awake some fine morning to realize they are prisoners in their own land and must do the bidding of the police state. Many actually wind up in prison as workers for the government on various government collectives. There is no protection. Life becomes a bitch and then you die----or are shot, which may be a blessing.

http://ragingdebate.com/economy/its-official-america-now-enforces-c...

Views: 74

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by fireguy on April 2, 2010 at 3:25pm
They will never stop stealing unless we stand up and make them.

There is no place to go abroad that their evil does not reach. Stand firm and oppose evil where you were planted.

Galatians 5:1

It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.

Romans 8:15

For you did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the Spirit of sonship.

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Mr. Sizzle favorited Larry Flinchpaugh's blog post Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden executed SEAL Team Six – here’s the proof
8 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle commented on Mr. Sizzle's photo
8 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle posted a photo
8 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
"Quote from a New Biology doctor " If germ theory was real we wouldn't be alive to believe…"
8 hours ago
MAC posted discussions
8 hours ago
Kim Moore updated their profile
9 hours ago
Aaron posted blog posts
12 hours ago
Old Denmark posted videos
13 hours ago
steve commented on Aaron's photo
Thumbnail

Screenshot - 2020-10-19T163901.986

"It is rumored the F B I had this info for more than 2 yrs. It's like a competition to BETRAY…"
13 hours ago
steve commented on Bob Renner's photo
Thumbnail

Goosebumps in books

"Hey All, I suggest reading "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance", one of the few…"
13 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Central Scrutinizer's video
14 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer posted videos
14 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Aaron's video
Thumbnail

#TrumpTheEstablishment

"...great timing in resurrecting your "Lock her up" campaign there Donny??? Wanna make a…"
14 hours ago
Aaron posted videos
14 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post HOW TO WIN BY A LANDSLIDE. THAT'S HOW ARDERN'S RESULTS WAS DESCRIBED -- A LANDSLIDE -- SHE WAS NOT POPULAR!
15 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Phyllis Maka's blog post HOW TO WIN BY A LANDSLIDE. THAT'S HOW ARDERN'S RESULTS WAS DESCRIBED -- A LANDSLIDE -- SHE WAS NOT POPULAR!
"what's the source here?? any article not authored by the original poster culled from another…"
15 hours ago
Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
15 hours ago
Aaron posted photos
15 hours ago
Aaron posted photos
15 hours ago
rlionhearted_3 posted photos
16 hours ago

© 2020   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted