CDC and ADA Now Advise to Avoid Using Fluoride

A new study in the Journal of the American Dental Association finds once again that, contrary to what most people have been told, fluoride is actually bad for teeth.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is of a similar opinion. According to their website:

"Recent evidence suggests that mixing powdered or liquid infant formula concentrate with fluoridated water on a regular basis may increase the chance of a child developing ... enamel fluorosis."

Even though the ADA and the CDC have issued warnings that parents not use fluoridated tap water to make infant formula, neither of them has openly informed the public!

So there are millions of parents out there using tap water to make up formula, oblivious of the fact that the agencies that promote fluoridation in this country have issued a specific warning against using fluoridated water for this purpose.

Not only that, but by fluoridating the municipal water supply you doom many low-income families to fail to protect their young children from this dangerous drug, even if they have this information, as they simply don't have the resources to install a reverse osmosis system.

see article below for full information and sources.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/11/13/cdc-a...

Favorite

3 members favorited this

< Previous Post

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Christopher on March 29, 2011 at 12:31pm: The proper amount of fluoride ('they'; the CDC, et al., should be ashamed, for using this worthless statement - there is no present, and or credible method, or metering system available, to accurately determine "the proper amount of fluoride", especially that which is consumed, by the average human being, who needs to drink water. And, not forgetting all the other drinks and foods, which are manufactured, with polluted water, containing fluoride. Especially of the industrial toxic waste pollutant type, which GOVERNMENTS are willfully purchasing from the phosphates industry, and with premeditation; contaminating our drinking water supplies and, the entire environment too) from infancy through old age helps prevent and control tooth decay. Community water fluoridation is a widely accepted practice (apart from being a great big misnomer - that statement is a big fat lie - most people who live in areas where their drinking water is artificially polluted with industrial grade fluoride, aren't even aware whether the water is or is not artificially fluoridated) for preventing and controlling tooth decay by adjusting the concentration of fluoride in the public water supply (the only reasons why 'they' have recently been lessening "adjusting the concentrations of fluoride"; is because everyone's children are ending up with "dental fluorosis" - this is a definite causal effect on the human body system, which shows up on the teeth, the sign posts if you will. Have you not heard of "skeletal fluorosis"? - Well; its not as easy to see a person's bones, as it is to see their teeth...right?).

As per the CDC's (Criminally Deceptive Campaign) perspective on FLUORIDE: http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/safety/infant_formula.htm

Comment by Tara on March 29, 2011 at 11:56am: You know what really irks me is that you still can buy water containing flouride in stores and it is marketed for infants to mix with their formula. Really young infants don't even have teeth yet so even if flouride was healthy for teeth (which it is not), why would there be any need for it? Unbelievable!!!!

Comment by Christopher on March 29, 2011 at 11:40am: JUDGES - THE GOVERNMENT'S WILD CARDS

Judge's decision on Fluoridation Consultation announced in London
Health Authority was not required to defer to public opposition.

JUDGE AND JUROR - [HOLMAN EDWARD] - recently ruled that the the South Central Strategic Health Authority (SCSHA), acted in accordance with the regulations on public consultation, over the proposed fluoridation scheme in Southampton, [UK] UNITED KING-DOMINATED (united - this being an obvious contradiction - particularly where the public expresses their concern - but obviously not worthy of, or granted the courtesy of due consideration).

THE STRATEGIC HEALTH AUTHORITY or, indeed, [THE STATE] itself, apparently possesses the power, to order the product [ARTIFICIAL WATER FLUORIDATION] to be administered to the public in a fashion that is virtually unavoidable, and with the intent to prevent a disease.

That determination (prevention of a so-called disease), is usually based on the medical schooling (education) and thus, the appropriate licencing, of a true, Health Professional (MEDICAL DOCTOR). And even then, only on a one-to-one basis - and most importantly - with the full and, controlled consent of the patient.

Artificially fluoridating the public's drinking water supplies - and - thus - entire water systems (environmental impact), is therefore a clinical intervention - As such; it would be in gross violation of medical law and, clinical Codes of Practice.

Link to original article: http://www.ukcaf.org/health_authorities_can_ignore_public_opinion.html