According to the United States Supreme Court, Obama is ineligible to be the President. That’s right, you read that correctly. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that Obama is ineligible to serve as President.
It’s not that you haven’t been paying attention lately and yes, you can be excused for missing the ruling as it came down, not in the last few days but back in 1875.
This is the argument currently being made by the Liberty Legal Foundation.
The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed not 1 but 2 lawsuits, one in Arizona and the other in Tennessee neither of which have one single thing to do with Obama’s birth certificate OR challenging whether or not Obama was born in the United States.
There is no need for either in regard to these lawsuits.
At the core of this action is a simple request that Federal courts uphold the Supreme Court ruling. Both lawsuits, and the Liberty Legal Foundation promises there will be more, would render it impossible for the Democratic National Committee to place Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot
Here’s the crux of it.
Back in 1875, the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v, Happersett, ruled that:
“Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”
MORE MORE MORE: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2011/11/13/u-s-supreme-court-has-...
Tags:
He's like Dog Shit DTOM, hard to get rid of, ya just gotta get down there and scrape him off your boots ;)
Either way, it's two sides of the same coin. We either get Republican tyranny or Democratic. They're just party masks really.
The unfortunate part is that the USSC will never hear any law suits on the subject of BHO eligibility. The case sited here was pre-progressive movement. Today's USSC, with the exception of a few are Activist and have over extented their Constutional boundries by making law and not ruling on laws and there is a big big difference. Roe Vs Wade, as an example, is not law, yet it is precieved and enforced as law. In reality it is the States right to determine and make laws along the lines of birth. Roe vs Wade was and is a fabrication inspired by two law students out of Texas, Roe nor Wade are reals names and never exsisted.....Again, the USSC does not make law, they render opinions of Constitutionality of law...opinions only. As a foot note those opinions can and have been ignored. Lincoln ingnored Dred Scot (1859) decision and enacted the Emancipation Proclamation in complete opposition to the Supreme Courts opinion of slave ownership. My personal opinion is that the USSC has done more to undermine the Consitution then any other branch...... Semper Fi
were both his parents united states citizens? i forget i know his mom was born here but people are even questioning if that guy he says was his dad was even his dad.. all i know is he is hiding something BIG
this means he was also ineligible for the term served which means any law signed any directive issued is garbage
Frank Marshall Davis was a U.S. military veteran and a natural born citizen. He helped raise president Obummer and seems to have been his estranged father. The Kenyan married a pregnant woman. Big deal. There are important reasons to close down The Chucky and Talking Tina show.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
© 2024 Created by truth. Powered by