Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Russ Jensen on April 14, 2014 at 5:26am

Hello John, Were you part of the initial or early days of the America Again Project? 

Irregardless I will be contacting you about  NYCommitteemen.org

Russ Jensen

Permalink Reply by Christopher on October 19, 2013 at 10:33pm

Isn't it the Mainstream Media?

Permalink Reply by Russ Jensen on April 14, 2014 at 5:21am

Hello Nathan, Interesting post, however, the Framers carefully designed a "One Branch" form of Government, and did so under the false appearance of creating a three branch system consisting of the Legislative (Article 1), the Executive (Article 2) and the Judicial (Article 3).

However, if that particular document known as the Constitution for the united States of America, is read correctly, applying correct definitions to words, and more importantly, to legal actions and processes, it is easy to verify my statement, a One Branch form of Government.

Article I Section 1

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested

Article II Section 1

1:  The executive Power shall be vested

Article III Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested

Gee, looks like Article 2 and Article 3 are missing something, aren't they?  A little thing called POWERS HEREIN GRANTED!

Everything that the Federal Government aka Congress does is authorized by Article 1, Section 8 Clause 10,

  To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

The Law of Nations-Emmerich Vattel, every member of the Constitutional Convention had a copy of this book THE LAW OF NATIONS when writing and carefully designing the Constitution, hiding away the true source of authority inside article 1, in the Enumerated Powers section and then letting everyone believe that Article 2 and 3 were valid, knowing that most could not read in those days and those that could probably would not grasp the significance of a few missing words.

Boy were they right about that!

I have made a few short videos explaining this simple information.  And then a few other short videos explaining at least the initial steps we are authorized to do by the Constitution and the Law of Nations in order to regain control of our Public Authorities.

You people are all looking to the wrong place which is why they continue to violate what you think is the Constitution, when in fact, most of that which they do is authorized by YOU for them to do, by your faithfulness to the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, which it is, which also makes the Law of Nations by Emmerich Vattel Supreme Law of the Land, by its direct incorporation in the Constitution at Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10.

It is the book Law of Nations which makes it IMPOSSIBLE to have granted power to Article 2 or Article 3 because of the conflict which would naturally occur between the Authority of the Law of Nations and those two offices, and would have also limited then, the full use of the Law of Nations.

Now I am including a link to the book and also some of my videos, so please at least read the book Law of Nations before commenting about this post, because if you do read the Law of Nations with some attention, you will know the truth of my words here.

Finally, at least check the definitions of the words GRANTED and VESTED, and do a simple search for the legal process known as Vesting and see if perhaps maybe, GRANTING and VESTING of anything including power, are 2 distinct legal activities, both of which must be completed in a specific manner, and both must be completed in order for the ACTUAL TRANSFER to have any effect.

http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/vattel/

http://vimeo.com/channels/lawofnations

http://12160.info/video/video/listForContributor?screenName=0a1xa21...

I Remain As Always In Your Service

Russ Jensen Salt Lake City

Permalink Reply by Nobody Will Observe on April 16, 2014 at 12:38am

Good post Russ, sorry for the premature comentation on my part.

"You people are all looking to the wrong place which is why they continue to violate what you think is the Constitution"

Funny stuff!

 

ASSUME ???

 

De Facto is a legal term meaning "in fact" or "in reality", which is used to qualify many legal terms. For example, de fact segregation refers to segregation which occurs without any official action by government officials, but results from social, psycholological, or economic conditions.

De facto may mean existing in fact whether with lawful authority or not. In another example, a corporation may be said to have de facto corporate status by inadvertently failing to fully satisfy all legal requirements for the creation of corporate existence, but has exercised corporate powers in good faith. Other applications include de facto authority, de facto court, de facto officers, and others.

BY FORCE OF:

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           GOVERNMENT  SOVEREIGN                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

HERE IS ANY LAW (THEY) WROTE

 

 

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page