The Supreme Court ruled against your Right to Remain Silent. I was shocked when I read it, and angry that these non elected Judges ruled against the 5th Amendment! They are a DISGRACE TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM! I found this in the NEW AMERICAN! DISGUSTING!

Sunday, 23 June 2013 14:00

Supreme Court Bombshell: No Right to Remain Silent

Written by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

 

 

The Supreme Court handed down a decision on June 17 that has been ignored by most media outlets, despite its devastating effect on one of the most fundamental rights protected by the Constitution.

 

In a 5-4 ruling, the justices ruled that a person no longer has the right to remain silent as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. In relevant part, the Fifth Amendment mandates that no one “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”

 

Thanks to the Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas v. Texas, that part of the Bill of Rights has been excised — and has joined the list of so many other fundamental liberties that now lie on the scrap heap of history.

 

 

 

Here’s a little background of the circumstances of the Salinas case, as told by Slate:

 

Two brothers were shot at home in Houston. There were no witnesses — only shotgun shell casings left at the scene. Genovevo Salinas had been at a party at that house the night before the shooting, and police invited him down to the station, where they talked for an hour. They did not arrest him or read him his Miranda warnings. Salinas agreed to give the police his shotgun for testing. Then the cops asked whether the gun would match the shells from the scene of the murder. According to the police, Salinas stopped talking, shuffled his feet, bit his lip, and started to tighten up.

 

At trial, Salinas did not testify, but prosecutors described his reportedly uncomfortable reaction to the question about his shotgun. Salinas argued this violated his Fifth Amendment rights: He had remained silent, and the Supreme Court had previously made clear that prosecutors can’t bring up a defendant’s refusal to answer the state’s questions. This time around, however, Justice Samuel Alito blithely responded that Salinas was “free to leave” and did not assert his right to remain silent. He was silent. But somehow, without a lawyer, and without being told his rights, he should have affirmatively “invoked” his right to not answer questions. Two other justices signed on to Alito’s opinion. Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Antonin Scalia joined the judgment, but for a different reason; they think Salinas had no rights at all to invoke before his arrest (they also object to Miranda itself). The upshot is another terrible Roberts Court ruling on confessions. In 2010 the court held that a suspect did not sufficiently invoke the right to remain silent when he stubbornly refused to talk, after receiving his Miranda warnings, during two hours of questioning.

 

Consider the ripple effect of the Salinas decision. Specifically, imagine how this ruling will alter the entire landscape of rights — including Miranda — and how they are applied (or not applied) to those accused of serious crimes. Here’s one potential application singled out by the Atlantic:

 

You know what's a much more recent wrinkle to the potential precedent effect of today's ruling? A case like that of the younger Boston Marathon suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who reportedly sat through 16 hours of questioning before he was read his Miranda rights. Had Tsarnaev, who was recovering from serious injuries at the time, remained silent during questioning without explicitly invoking his Fifth Amendment, prosecutors could, under the Salinas ruling, now use that silence to their advantage.

 

Guilty or not, suspects in the United States no longer have the right to remain silent. If they remain silent, moreover, that silence will now be interpreted as guilt and will indeed — despite what you see on television court and cop dramas — be used against that person in a court of law. Even, in fact, the highest court in the land.

 

Another terrifying twist to the Salinas decision is that it imposes on a suspect the necessity of invoking specific language before law enforcement will honor the basic civil liberties of a person who is (or historically, was) innocent until proven guilty.

 

Justice Breyer recognized how this novel necessity places a nearly insuperable barrier to invoking one’s right to remain silent. Writing for the dissent, Justice Breyer asked, “How can an individual who is not a lawyer know that these particular words [“I expressly invoke the privilege against self incrimination”] are legally magic?”

 

Breyer goes on to propose a “far better” way to protect a person’s right to not incriminate himself.

 

Can one fairly infer from an individual’s silence and surrounding circumstances an exercise of the Fifth Amendment’s privilege? The need for simplicity, the constitutional importance of applying the Fifth Amendment to those who seek its protections, and this Court’s case law all suggest that this is the right question to ask here. And the answer to that question in the circumstances of today’s case is clearly: yes.

 

In the black-is-white-up-is-down world that we live in, it is no longer surprising to see constitutionally protected liberties being championed by the “liberal” bloc of justices, while the so-called “conservatives” chisel away at the bedrock of freedom.

 

Our Founding Fathers understood how vital the right against self-incrimination was to the pursuit of justice. Consider the following defense of that right offered by imminent Founding Era jurist Joseph Story:

 

This also is but an affirmance of a common law privilege. But it is of inestimable value. It is well known, that in some countries, not only are criminals compelled to give evidence against themselves, but are subjected to the rack or torture in order to procure a confession of guilt. And what is worse, it has been (as if in mockery or scorn) attempted to excuse, or justify it, upon the score of mercy and humanity to the accused. It has been contrived, (it is pretended,) that innocence should manifest itself by a stout resistance or guilt by a plain confession; as if a man's innocence were to be tried by the hardness of his constitution, and his guilt by the sensibility of his nerves. Cicero, many ages ago, though he lived in a state, wherein it was usual to put slaves to the torture, in order to furnish evidence, has denounced the absurdity and wickedness of the measure in terms of glowing eloquence, as striking, as they are brief. They are conceived in the spirit of Tacitus, and breathe all his pregnant and indignant sarcasm. Ulpian, also, at a still later period in Roman jurisprudence, stamped the practice with severe reproof.

 

In one day the Supreme Court of the United States now dispenses with a right defended by Cicero over 2,000 years ago.

 

Finally, read the warning issued by Abraham Holmes during the Massachusetts ratifying convention in January 1788:

 

There is nothing to prevent Congress from passing laws which shall compel a man, who is accused or suspected of a crime, to furnish evidence against himself, and even from establishing laws which shall order the court to take the charge exhibited against a man for truth, unless he can furnish evidence of his innocence.

 

I do not pretend to say Congress will do this; but, sir, I undertake to say that Congress (according to the powers proposed to be given them by the Constitution) may do it; and if they do not, it will be owing entirely — I repeat it, it will be owing entirely — to the goodness of the men, and not in the least degree owing to the goodness of the Constitution.

 

In the Salinas case, it was as Holmes wisely predicted: The goodness of the Constitution was not enough to protect one of our most fundamental and cherished liberties from the assault by an almost all-powerful federal government.

 

 

 

Joe A. Wolverton, II, J.D. is a correspondent for The New American and travels frequently nationwide speaking on topics of nullification, the NDAA, and the surveillance state. He can be reached at jwolverton@thenewamerican.com.

J Patriot’s  Thought’s:  This is a monumental defeat for Patriot’s everywhere! They will not stop until the U.S. Constitution is a worthless piece of paper. The blame goes to the Politicians, but also to the American people as a whole! We are the one’s ultimately responsible for voting these clowns back into Office even after they show their true colors! I know elections can’t be trusted, and the machines they use to count the votes are rigged by the Banksters, but if the American people still had a back bone all of this could have been stopped years ago. It’s passed the point of no return, and when the economy collapses because the Politician’s are stealing, spending money they don’t have all you have to do America is look into the mirror! All in by the way while you wait longer their preparing to go to War with you. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has awarded defense contractor ATK with an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) agreement for .40 caliber hollow point ammunition. According to an official ATK press release, U.S. agents will receive a maximum of 450 million rounds over a five-year period. Read H.R. 645 over 180,000,000 dollars to be allotted to building you and your Families new home! That was in 2009 to 2010 I’m sure it’s more now! Their buying the bullets to put you in the ground or their spending money to put you into an F.E.M.A. Camp! Their getting ready for the economic holocaust that’s coming! What are you doing to prepare! They also have been working hard to dismantle your Bill of Rights starting with the 4th Amendment with the Patriot Bill Section 213, and continuing with the 5th Amendment one of our most important Amendments! Take a long look at it America before it’s thrown in the basement with the cobwebs!

 Amendment V

 

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

All by the way time is not on our side its own their side! While we wait they build, and remodel old Military Installations into F.E.M.A. Camps, and buy more Ammo, create more Draconian Laws , and dismantle our U.S. Constitution! Their creating a Police State and getting ready because they know it’s coming, but by then they will be dug in and ready for you America! 

Views: 100

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Less Prone on September 22, 2014 at 6:58am

The rights are being taken away little by little, untill nothing remains.

Latest Activity

Diana posted photos
19 minutes ago
Boris commented on Diana's photo
28 minutes ago
Diana's 2 photos were featured
29 minutes ago
Boris favorited Less Prone's video
36 minutes ago
Diana favorited dogitydog's discussion OOOPS!
40 minutes ago
Diana favorited Chris of the family Masters's video
58 minutes ago
Diana favorited Doc Vega's blog post 2000 Radioactive Wild Boars Threaten Fukushima
1 hour ago
Nazda Pokmov commented on Nikki's video
Thumbnail

A Vicious Racist Homosexual. J Edgar Hoover

"The FBI of today is NOT WHAT YOU THINK IT IS.....it is an agency made up of very evil folks....don't let anyone tell you otherwise."
2 hours ago
dogitydog favorited Chris of the family Masters's video
2 hours ago
dogitydog commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

Gilette Objectifying Women - Can't They Do Better?

"Is that the best a man can get? I'm good with that!"
2 hours ago
dogitydog favorited Raz Putin's discussion H.R.204 - American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2019 (US withdrawl from the UN)
2 hours ago
dogitydog replied to Raz Putin's discussion H.R.204 - American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2019 (US withdrawl from the UN)
"You know what they say. "If it sounds too good to be true......." Sure would solve a lot of problems though. Agenda 21/2030 for starters."
2 hours ago
dogitydog replied to dogitydog's discussion OOOPS!
"The only mistake was letting the cat out of the bag. Prove that she is alive!"
2 hours ago
dogitydog posted a discussion

OOOPS!

Fox & Friends Apologizes for Accidental Graphic Saying Ruth Bader Ginsburg is DeadFox & Friends apologized on Monday after briefly airing a graphic suggesting that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is dead.As the show came back from…See More
2 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Chris of the family Masters's video
Thumbnail

YOU CAN THANK OPEN BORDERS AND MASS IMMIGRATION FOR THE LA COUNTY TEACHER'S STRIKE

"The fallacy of obsession of 'growing' economy'. Most people want to be left alone and leave in peace."
3 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted videos
3 hours ago

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted