Comment

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on June 6, 2018 at 2:52pm

David Icke - New Tower 7 Evidence - YOU MUST SEE THIS

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on June 5, 2018 at 12:11am

Christopher Bollyn "The Dual-Deception of 9/11 and the Fraudulent War on Terror”

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on May 29, 2018 at 8:20pm

AV7 - Field McConnell - Hillary Clinton's connection to 9/11

Comment by Less Prone on April 14, 2018 at 11:57am

A version they didn't tell you

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on March 22, 2018 at 4:11pm

AN INCONVENIENT 9/11 TRUTH [Part I] (2017 version)

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on August 1, 2017 at 10:03am

C-SPAN Does NOT Like Building 7 Callers

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on June 26, 2017 at 11:01am

HILLARY CINTON CONNECTION TO 9/11 PUT YOUR SEATBELTS ON FOR THIS ONE

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on May 14, 2017 at 5:49pm

FBI Exposes 911 As Inside Job! Pentagon Photos Re-Released

Comment by Less Prone on October 12, 2016 at 10:36pm

Dr. MacQueen Presents Analysis of WTC Eyewitness Accounts

Comment by Less Prone on October 7, 2016 at 7:28am

Today, we invite you to watch Dr. Leroy Hulsey present the preliminary findings of his WTC 7 computer modeling study to the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. Dr. Hulsey is a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and the chair of UAF’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

When asked by the panel of attorneys, “On a scale of 1 to 100, how probable do you think it is that this building could have collapsed simply because of the fire?” Dr. Hulsey stated categorically, “Zero.” Asked if he would flunk one of his Ph.D. students for turning in the kind of analysis that NIST did, he replied emphatically, “Yes.”

LINK TO VIDEO

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 25
• Next ›
• Page